A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1111

Post by onewithhim »

[Replying to post 1104 by tam]

How does one "test the inspired expressions"? To me, there is no way to "test" them unless you go right to the Bible, and what Christ has said would be enough to "test," I imagine, whatever teaching you come across. If it conflicts with what Christ has said in the Bible, it is unarguably erroneous.

Along these lines, there are churches that preach even from the pulpit that their members should support the world's institutions including the armed forces and join in with going to war. This directly conflicts with Christ's teaching about loving our enemies. (Matthew 5:44) One should separate himself from those churches, right?...if we want to follow Christ.

One last point: Jesus directed his followers to pray to the Father, not himself. (Matthew 6:9) Are you praying to Jesus? That's not what he said to do.

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1112

Post by tam »

Peace to you onewithhim!
onewithhim wrote: [Replying to post 1104 by tam]

How does one "test the inspired expressions"?


I think I shared how in the post above. That is how my Lord has taught me.
To me, there is no way to "test" them unless you go right to the Bible, and what Christ has said would be enough to "test," I imagine, whatever teaching you come across. If it conflicts with what Christ has said in the Bible, it is unarguably erroneous.
If one hears Him, one can ask Him what He meant (or what is meant by something else that is written). And again, nothing that is from Christ, will be against love. Because God is love.

But if something is in conflict with Christ, then yes, it is erroneous.

Along these lines, there are churches that preach even from the pulpit that their members should support the world's institutions including the armed forces and join in with going to war. This directly conflicts with Christ's teaching about loving our enemies. (Matthew 5:44) One should separate himself from those churches, right?...if we want to follow Christ.
One should separate from any 'church/sect/denomination' that teaches people to do things that are in conflict with Christ.



One last point: Jesus directed his followers to pray to the Father, not himself. (Matthew 6:9) Are you praying to Jesus? That's not what he said to do.
I pray to the Father, as my Lord said to do. Prayer is reserved for God. Christ prayed to His Father, and taught us to do the same.

"If anyone loves ME, they will obey MY commands. My father will love them, and we will come and make our home with them."

Peace to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1113

Post by ttruscott »

onewithhim wrote:
It is not possible for the spirit of God through Christ to lead two people through two different sets of beliefs. Why would he do that? He said he was "the truth." That must mean he recognizes one set of beliefs. How can "there is a fiery hell" and "there is no fiery hell" BOTH be true? Please.
And now you should point out to all where I wrote they are both true... or admit to another knee-jerk reaction.

I wonder: when GOD allowed one portion of HIS people to believe that HIS Messiah was to be The King of GOD's worldly Kingdom and another to beleive that the Messiah was to be a Spiritual King in the Spiritual Kingdom of GOD

was HE lying to someone or just allowing a lengthy time of being mistaken or even something else?

When HE called some HIS chosen people and they thought HE meant Nationally, not spiritually, were they to be considered liars or failures when HE finally revealed that HIS chosen people meant HIS elect on earth, or was He guilty of fraud in the first place?

There is no culpability in HIS progressive revelation. To ask how HE can be called truthful when HE teaches a short version of the full truth and only expands upon it at a later time: Daniel 12:4 But you, Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end. and 2 Corinthians 12:4 ...was caught up to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell. means HE is keeping some things back from us, secrets we are not ready to hear... John 16:12 "I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear.

These secrets cause holes in everyone's theology and until all is revealed, they can't be filled except in some persons like Daniel and Paul etc who both got teachings that others did not get...two truths This is why I do not get too bent out of shape over someone's mistakes and don't engage in pinhead dancing arguments - it might be GOD who has decided they need something to be held back. Nor do I get too excited over claims to have the full truth...

I try to work on the principle that all things work to the good of HIS chosen so I don't wage war against those who can't bear to hear something. It is HIS job to bring them around.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1114

Post by onewithhim »

ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
It is not possible for the spirit of God through Christ to lead two people through two different sets of beliefs. Why would he do that? He said he was "the truth." That must mean he recognizes one set of beliefs. How can "there is a fiery hell" and "there is no fiery hell" BOTH be true? Please.
And now you should point out to all where I wrote they are both true... or admit to another knee-jerk reaction.
What else could I get out of this? "We both [yourself and Tam, though you don't agree on some major things] are led by a Spirit in the name of Christ."

If Christ is leading you BOTH, and you believe different things, then there could be no other conclusion drawn than you think all beliefs are true.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1115

Post by onewithhim »

ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
It is not possible for the spirit of God through Christ to lead two people through two different sets of beliefs. Why would he do that? He said he was "the truth." That must mean he recognizes one set of beliefs. How can "there is a fiery hell" and "there is no fiery hell" BOTH be true? Please.
And now you should point out to all where I wrote they are both true... or admit to another knee-jerk reaction.

I wonder: when GOD allowed one portion of HIS people to believe that HIS Messiah was to be The King of GOD's worldly Kingdom and another to beleive that the Messiah was to be a Spiritual King in the Spiritual Kingdom of GOD

was HE lying to someone or just allowing a lengthy time of being mistaken or even something else?
Obviously a portion of His people were not paying any attention to what He had told them through the Law of Moses and the many prophets. Jehovah didn't tell people different things. To disregard His letting them know about His own government coming to the earth, and pawning off that notion to embrace a vague, ethereal notion of some spiritual development inside people, is not His fault....He clearly told them over and over again.

Isaiah 9:6,7

Daniel 2:44

Psalm 37:9-11, 29

Matthew 5:5

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1116

Post by marco »

onewithhim wrote:

Obviously a portion of His people were not paying any attention to what He had told them through the Law of Moses and the many prophets. Jehovah didn't tell people different things. To disregard His letting them know about His own government coming to the earth, and pawning off that notion to embrace a vague, ethereal notion of some spiritual development inside people, is not His fault....He clearly told them over and over again.

Isaiah 9:6,7 Daniel 2:44 Psalm 37:9-11, 29 Matthew 5:5
Well he HAS to take some of the blame, for if the four places are the best you can come up with as the "clear" expression of God's intentions, then his prophets could have done with an elementary course in communication.

"They shall inherit the Earth" is a riddle. Yes, we can go away with our own interpretation. But why word it thus, when a few simple words would have sufficed to explain one of the meanings? Try this:
"Look folk, there's no soul or spirit - the body will go on living. The Planet Earth will be refurbished; mountains lowered, volcanoes removed and tsunamis a thing of the past. Good folk will live on this new Earth for ever."

Matthew's words are just an echo of Psalms, which is the usual trick of finding some bit of the OT to give the appearance of prophecy.
Now look at the next lines after your Psalms quote. "For yet a little while and the wicked shall not be." What possible meaning has this? Is this clarity?

Your Daniel quote starts: "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed."
The days of what kings ? Again this is as clear as mud. Yet you harangue people for not extracting a meaning from these words.
Should we put aside our belief in a soul because of these meaningless lines? I think not.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1117

Post by onewithhim »

marco wrote:
onewithhim wrote:

Obviously a portion of His people were not paying any attention to what He had told them through the Law of Moses and the many prophets. Jehovah didn't tell people different things. To disregard His letting them know about His own government coming to the earth, and pawning off that notion to embrace a vague, ethereal notion of some spiritual development inside people, is not His fault....He clearly told them over and over again.

Isaiah 9:6,7 Daniel 2:44 Psalm 37:9-11, 29 Matthew 5:5
Well he HAS to take some of the blame, for if the four places are the best you can come up with as the "clear" expression of God's intentions, then his prophets could have done with an elementary course in communication.

"They shall inherit the Earth" is a riddle. Yes, we can go away with our own interpretation. But why word it thus, when a few simple words would have sufficed to explain one of the meanings? Try this:
"Look folk, there's no soul or spirit - the body will go on living. The Planet Earth will be refurbished; mountains lowered, volcanoes removed and tsunamis a thing of the past. Good folk will live on this new Earth for ever."

Matthew's words are just an echo of Psalms, which is the usual trick of finding some bit of the OT to give the appearance of prophecy.
Now look at the next lines after your Psalms quote. "For yet a little while and the wicked shall not be." What possible meaning has this? Is this clarity?

Your Daniel quote starts: "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed."
The days of what kings ? Again this is as clear as mud. Yet you harangue people for not extracting a meaning from these words.
Should we put aside our belief in a soul because of these meaningless lines? I think not.
The clear expressions of God's intentions for the earth are exemplified in the four scriptures I cited....there is a whole 66-book canon that harmonizes with those cited scriptures. You offer a message that would've left little doubt about God's intentions, and may I say that that is exactly what He has told us---not in a sentence or two---but throughout the Bible. Don't folks find fault with a sentence here and a sentence there and accuse certain ones of "taking out of context," etc.? Well, that's why we have to read the whole book to get the whole idea. (And certainly, if Jesus reiterated what David had written, wouldn't there be merit in checking out a lot of what David had to say? Obviously Jesus agreed with him. David said, "Evildoers will be cut off, but those who wait for the LORD, they will inherit the land....The humble will inherit the land and will delight themselves in abundant prosperity.....The righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever." (Psalm 37:9,11,29, NASB)

I think it IS clarity when God inspired "the wicked shall not be." He obviously is telling us that we can keep from being despairing & feeling hopeless, because wicked people will not always be here. They will be "cut off," or, put out of operation by being destroyed. This is good news and a real hope for people who are sighing and crying over the wickedness being practiced in the world. (See Ezekiel 9:4, KJV.)

Why don't you go to Daniel chapter 2 and read it all? I assume people will do that so they will see I am not taking thoughts "out of context." Daniel describes all the major world governments that have had a direct influence on God's people, down through the centuries. He starts with Babylon and goes down through Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, all the way down to the kingdoms that would come after Rome. (Daniel 2:38-43) If you sneer at this, because I'm a JW, type in on your search engine "Immense Image of Daniel Ch.2," and you'll find an assortment of illustrations of this image from many different denominations. It seems that scholars agree on the powers that preceded the ones represented by the feet. Whether everyone agrees or not on what powers the feet represent, they do agree that the Kingdom of God will put them out of business some time after the Roman Empire. It takes a lot of studying to figure out just what powers are involved in the feet. Wouldn't you consider it interesting to find out what the thinking is on that? They are far from meaningless, and I have to say that your belief in an immortal soul is readily contradicted by a whole line of arguments connected directly with clear scriptures....that have been muddied by church people, scribes with bias, and certain ones with a hidden agendum, mixing "soul" and "spirit" together and misrepresenting scriptures that contradict their shoddy teachings. (Such as Ecclesiastes 12:7.) People get all out of shape when Ecclesiastes 9:5 is quoted. They say, "Solomon was depressed! We can't take that seriously!" :sadblinky: But then they defend the belief in an immortal soul by quoting Ecclesiastes 12:7! Wasn't Solomon still depressed, if he was depressed when he wrote Eccl.9:5?

Whether or not he was depressed, the two verses seem to contradict themselves, IF you believe in an immortal soul. So let's just say that Eccl.9:5 is legitimate. "The dead are conscious of nothing." How do we understand Eccl.12:7? (Never mind that the "spirit" is not the same thing as the "soul.") The "spirit" MUST have a different meaning than an immortal soul. What happens to a dead person? He goes back to dust (Genesis 3:19; first part of Eccl.12:7). If the dead know nothing, then what could the spirit possibly be? How about the vital force in living creatures? The force from God that keeps a being alive?

The Hebrew Scriptures, inspired by the Designer of man, evidently use ru'ach to denote this vital force that is the very principle of life, and neshamah' to represent the breathing that sustains it. (More interesting information available from Insight on the Scriptures Volume 2, by the WT Bible & Tract Society, at no cost.)

This "ru'ach" (spirit) returns to God in the sense that He is the Source of life. It is He who will decide the future prospects of the dead person.

There is plenty of solid reason to reject the belief in an immortal soul. It takes EFFORT to read all of the scriptures and glean an accurate picture of what God wants us to know about our origins, His nature, why there is suffering, why the sacrifice of Jesus means something, what the future is for the Earth. The scriptures are full of what conditions on the Earth will be like when the Messiah begins his reign. (One such scripture is Isaiah 11:1-10. A person who is familiar with the Bible knows that "a twig out of the stump of Jesse" is referring to the Messiah, who is a descendant of David, the son of Jesse.)



:study: :study: :study: :study:

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1118

Post by marco »

onewithhim wrote:
The scriptures are full of what conditions on the Earth will be like when the Messiah begins his reign. (One such scripture is Isaiah 11:1-10. A person who is familiar with the Bible knows that "a twig out of the stump of Jesse" is referring to the Messiah, who is a descendant of David, the son of Jesse.)
It is annoying that a prophet uses figures and absurdities to scatter his truths. Instead of saying directly that Jesus would, by a sort of trick of genealogy, be descended from David he talks of stems and branches. But that's okay.

What seems ridiculous in the verses you call our attention to is the following:
Forget wolves lying down with lambs and lions eating straw with oxen, what are we to make of " the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice' den. "
The cockatrice is a fabulous monster with the tail of a dragon. Was Isaiah drunk when he made these predictions?

Why should people pay attention to this when one needs half a ton of generosity - not to say ingenuity - to place any serious meaning to it?

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1119

Post by ttruscott »

marco wrote:
It is annoying that a prophet uses figures and absurdities to scatter his truths. Instead of saying directly that Jesus would, by a sort of trick of genealogy, be descended from David he talks of stems and branches. But that's okay.
All figures and absurdities are use to force the true elect, though sinful, to seek GOD and not his own understanding...it is relationship GOD wants, not intellectual agreement.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1120

Post by marco »

ttruscott wrote:
marco wrote:
It is annoying that a prophet uses figures and absurdities to scatter his truths. Instead of saying directly that Jesus would, by a sort of trick of genealogy, be descended from David he talks of stems and branches. But that's okay.
All figures and absurdities are use to force the true elect, though sinful, to seek GOD and not his own understanding...it is relationship GOD wants, not intellectual agreement.

We can, and we do, make sense of anything, whether by wishful thinking or ingenious constructions. We can take a painting that an infant or an idiot artist has made and read into it genius; we do this regularly with the rubbish that passes for Art. So taking dragons and straw-eating lions as sensible predictions is not hard to do if one has the willingness to do it. For me, a message that requires abasement of what I value as truth and beauty is what it appears to be, nonsense.

In ancient times dragons may have flown around the skies and the unsophisticated Isaiah could well have believed in the things he voices, but surely today we have saner, intelligent counsel and if it is beauty we seek, then we turn to our classical writers and painters and makers of music. Isaiah is not even an infant beside them but I appreciate that, if you are required to make sense of what you take as divine truth, then you must seek and eventually the door will be opened for you. I'm afraid I don't have the patience or willingness to find art in elephant dung or divinity in dragons.

Post Reply