Sometimes great folk walk among us and we hardly seem to notice.
From Dictatorship to Democracy
Gene Sharp
Gene Sharp Lecture
Scientific American on Gene Sharp
Gene Sharp Interview
Is Gene Sharp one of the least known Great and positive Influences of our age?
Will it be left to later generations to fully recognise his worth?
Does his pragmatic philosophy always hold true?
Gene Sharp
Moderator: Moderators
- Furrowed Brow
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: Here
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
- Clownboat
- Savant
- Posts: 9923
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 1196 times
- Been thanked: 1576 times
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #21Is there a reason for us to be concerned that Sharia Law may actually get a foothold in the US?East of Eden wrote:Was Nelson Mandela spreading 'hate' when he spoke of the injustices of apartheid?Clownboat wrote: I think I agree with you. What I'm curious about is, are you here to inform people about the evils for some reason or just to spread "hate" (for lack of a better word).
I'm not sure what the solution is, but for starters we have to make darn sure Sharia Law never gets a foothold in the US, and that ALL citizens abide by our laws. Islam is not just another religion, but rather an expansionary fascist political state as well.I assume you mention this for a reason, and that is what I am curious about. Or maybe you have a solution we could talk about, that would be even better.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #22It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.Clownboat wrote:Is there a reason for us to be concerned that Sharia Law may actually get a foothold in the US?East of Eden wrote:Was Nelson Mandela spreading 'hate' when he spoke of the injustices of apartheid?Clownboat wrote: I think I agree with you. What I'm curious about is, are you here to inform people about the evils for some reason or just to spread "hate" (for lack of a better word).
I'm not sure what the solution is, but for starters we have to make darn sure Sharia Law never gets a foothold in the US, and that ALL citizens abide by our laws. Islam is not just another religion, but rather an expansionary fascist political state as well.I assume you mention this for a reason, and that is what I am curious about. Or maybe you have a solution we could talk about, that would be even better.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 749183.ece
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #23The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #24So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.Wyvern wrote:The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #25Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.East of Eden wrote:So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.Wyvern wrote:The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #26.....which would make one a liberal, right?Wyvern wrote:Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.East of Eden wrote:So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.Wyvern wrote:The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.

"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Gene Sharp
Post #27Since you are now calling yourself a liberal does that mean you don't care much what the constitution says?East of Eden wrote:.....which would make one a liberal, right?Wyvern wrote:Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.East of Eden wrote:So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.Wyvern wrote:The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.