Gene Sharp

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Furrowed Brow
Site Supporter
Posts: 3720
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Here
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Gene Sharp

Post #1

Post by Furrowed Brow »

Sometimes great folk walk among us and we hardly seem to notice.

From Dictatorship to Democracy

Gene Sharp

Gene Sharp Lecture

Scientific American on Gene Sharp

Gene Sharp Interview

Is Gene Sharp one of the least known Great and positive Influences of our age?
Will it be left to later generations to fully recognise his worth?
Does his pragmatic philosophy always hold true?

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 9923
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1196 times
Been thanked: 1576 times

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #21

Post by Clownboat »

East of Eden wrote:
Clownboat wrote: I think I agree with you. What I'm curious about is, are you here to inform people about the evils for some reason or just to spread "hate" (for lack of a better word).
Was Nelson Mandela spreading 'hate' when he spoke of the injustices of apartheid?
I assume you mention this for a reason, and that is what I am curious about. Or maybe you have a solution we could talk about, that would be even better.
I'm not sure what the solution is, but for starters we have to make darn sure Sharia Law never gets a foothold in the US, and that ALL citizens abide by our laws. Islam is not just another religion, but rather an expansionary fascist political state as well.
Is there a reason for us to be concerned that Sharia Law may actually get a foothold in the US?
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #22

Post by East of Eden »

Clownboat wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
Clownboat wrote: I think I agree with you. What I'm curious about is, are you here to inform people about the evils for some reason or just to spread "hate" (for lack of a better word).
Was Nelson Mandela spreading 'hate' when he spoke of the injustices of apartheid?
I assume you mention this for a reason, and that is what I am curious about. Or maybe you have a solution we could talk about, that would be even better.
I'm not sure what the solution is, but for starters we have to make darn sure Sharia Law never gets a foothold in the US, and that ALL citizens abide by our laws. Islam is not just another religion, but rather an expansionary fascist political state as well.
Is there a reason for us to be concerned that Sharia Law may actually get a foothold in the US?
It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 749183.ece
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
Wyvern
Under Probation
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:50 pm

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #23

Post by Wyvern »

It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #24

Post by East of Eden »

Wyvern wrote:
It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.
So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
Wyvern
Under Probation
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:50 pm

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #25

Post by Wyvern »

East of Eden wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.
So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.
Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #26

Post by East of Eden »

Wyvern wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.
So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.
Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.
.....which would make one a liberal, right? ;)
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
Wyvern
Under Probation
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:50 pm

Re: Gene Sharp

Post #27

Post by Wyvern »

East of Eden wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
It certainly has a foothold in the UK, which would have seemed equally unthinkable at one time. This is why a number of states are trying to stop it from ever being an alternative here.
The UK does not have the same constitution as ours specifically the US constitution has a separation of church and state which makes it impossible for a religiously derived justice system to be implemented. The UK on the other hand does not have any separation and in fact has a state religion.
So what's the harm in states making sure of that? Unfortunately, we have a lot on the left who don't seem to much care what the Constitution says.
Even if what you say is true about the left it doesn't matter, the constitution is the supreme law of the US for which no laws can be made that violate it. As for the harm, personally I'm for the government not wasting time and money on non issues such as this. I thought you were a conservative but here you are advocating government waste due to fear mongering.
.....which would make one a liberal, right? ;)
Since you are now calling yourself a liberal does that mean you don't care much what the constitution says?

Post Reply