Homosexuality

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Daystar
Student
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:43 pm

Homosexuality

Post #1

Post by Daystar »

Italy's nominee to become the European Union's Justice and Home Affairs commissioner failed on Monday to win the backing of the European Parliament's Justice Committee, days after testifying that he considers homosexuality a sin.

The panel narrowly failed to endorse Rocco Buttiglione, who is currently Italy's European Affairs minister, said Jean-Louis Bourlanges, chairman of the Justice Committee.

Buttiglione said that he would fight for the rights of homosexuals, but would not back away from his statement that the lifestyle is sinful.

Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful (Lev. 18:22).

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Homosexuality

Post #2

Post by bernee51 »

Daystar wrote:
Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful (Lev. 18:22).
only if you believe sin is possibe - I don't believe it is. I am not a sinner - never have been - never will be.

Daystar
Student
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:43 pm

Re: Homosexuality

Post #3

Post by Daystar »

bernee51 wrote:
Daystar wrote:
Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful (Lev. 18:22).
only if you believe sin is possibe - I don't believe it is. I am not a sinner - never have been - never will be.
[Daystar] Man, are you deceived :-) We're all sinners. What do you call evil?

User avatar
ProfMoriarty
Student
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 7:35 am
Location: (near) Bristol, England
Contact:

Post #4

Post by ProfMoriarty »

Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful
Why is it sinful?
Prof M

Evolution is just a theory, and proud of it. :idea:
THE BRIGHTS - http://www.the-brights.net/fourms

Daystar
Student
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:43 pm

Post #5

Post by Daystar »

ProfMoriarty wrote:
Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful
Why is it sinful?
[Day] Doesn't the law of nature speak to you? The male body was designed for a woman, and a woman's body designed for a man. Anal sex between men is as unnatural and repulsive as it gets, as are their other practices. God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

I respect homosexuals as individuals who are entitled to the same rights as anyone else. I even have some who are friends. But their lifestyle is an abomination to God (lev. 18:22) and they need to repent (as do heterosexuals).

User avatar
ENIGMA
Sage
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 1:51 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post #6

Post by ENIGMA »

Daystar wrote:
ProfMoriarty wrote:
Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful
Why is it sinful?
[Day] Doesn't the law of nature speak to you? The male body was designed for a woman, and a woman's body designed for a man. Anal sex between men is as unnatural and repulsive as it gets, as are their other practices. God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Does this extend to two women as well or are their practices in that regard worth gawking at, in your opinion?
I respect homosexuals as individuals who are entitled to the same rights as anyone else. I even have some who are friends. But their lifestyle is an abomination to God (lev. 18:22) and they need to repent (as do heterosexuals).
I take it then that you also consider the stoning of disobedient children to be a righteous and morally upright action to take? (Deut. 21:18-21).
Gilt and Vetinari shared a look. It said: While I loathe you and all of your personal philosophy to a depth unplummable by any line, I will credit you at least with not being Crispin Horsefry [The big loud idiot in the room].

-Going Postal, Discworld

User avatar
Lotan
Guru
Posts: 2006
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: The Abyss

Post #7

Post by Lotan »

Daystar wrote:
The male body was designed for a woman, and a woman's body designed for a man. Anal sex between men is as unnatural and repulsive as it gets, as are their other practices.
If you feel that homosexuality is 'repulsive' that is your opinion, but to say that it is 'unnatural' is hardly accurate, considering how prevalent these behaviors are among animals.
And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto His people. Exodus 32:14

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Homosexuality

Post #8

Post by bernee51 »

Daystar wrote: Man, are you deceived :-)
why do you assert that I am deceived? How? And by whom? How do you know you are not the one being deceived?
Daystar wrote: We're all sinners.
I beg to differ. I most certainly am not. But you claim to be one. How are you a sinner?
Daystar wrote: What do you call evil?
the absence of 'good'.

User avatar
ProfMoriarty
Student
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 7:35 am
Location: (near) Bristol, England
Contact:

Post #9

Post by ProfMoriarty »

Doesn't the law of nature speak to you?
Well no, the law of nature doesn't speak to me. (I wasn't aware there was one). Nature does whatever is expedient at the time - if you even try to base morality on nature you will be in trouble. Homosexual behaviour is very common in nature, for a variety of reasons, but mainly as a means for a low-ranking member of a group to steal the chance to mate with a high ranking female while no one is looking. So you can read that as saying that homosexuality is perfectly normal; but you can't take from this that it is morally correct or incorrect.

Homosexuality applies equally to male and to female - homo in this context means "same", it is nothing to do with 'human' or any indicator of gender.

But what I want to know is why is it sinful? And what I want to know is why is it sinful? Two different questions. (And what do you mean by sinful anyway? ) . What business is it of anyone to make judgements about a person based upon their sexuality?

Just trying to get some answers here that aren't simply references to bible verses.
Prof M

Evolution is just a theory, and proud of it. :idea:
THE BRIGHTS - http://www.the-brights.net/fourms

Daystar
Student
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:43 pm

Post #10

Post by Daystar »

ENIGMA wrote:
Daystar wrote:
ProfMoriarty wrote:
Isn't this the way it should be? Fight for the rights of homosexuals, but individuals, but define their lifestyle as sinful
Why is it sinful?
[Day] Doesn't the law of nature speak to you? The male body was designed for a woman, and a woman's body designed for a man. Anal sex between men is as unnatural and repulsive as it gets, as are their other practices. God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Does this extend to two women as well or are their practices in that regard worth gawking at, in your opinion?

[Day] Worth gawking at? Same sex is an abomination to God.
I respect homosexuals as individuals who are entitled to the same rights as anyone else. I even have some who are friends. But their lifestyle is an abomination to God (lev. 18:22) and they need to repent (as do heterosexuals).
I take it then that you also consider the stoning of disobedient children to be a righteous and morally upright action to take? (Deut. 21:18-21).

[Day] The moral law (Tem Commandments) is binding on everyone. The Mosaic laws were given only to Israel. If they believe in the Torah, then why don't they do what it says? I can't answer that. Ask them. But since we are in the dispensation of grace, since Calvary, there is a better way: Repent, forgive and believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ. Children shouldn't be stoned, but disciplined according to their behavior.

Post Reply