Q: Is taking an agnostic position on unknown things, a matter of safety (as the quote above implies) or of sensibility aligned with current knowledge of reality?But go head and remain completely agnostic, for safety's sake
Agnosticism. For safety or sensibilities' sake?
Moderator: Moderators
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 916 times
- Been thanked: 1648 times
- Contact:
Agnosticism. For safety or sensibilities' sake?
Post #1[ POI Wrote]
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 916 times
- Been thanked: 1648 times
- Contact:
Re: Agnosticism. For safety or sensibilities' sake?
Post #21Yep.Mae von H wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:27 amYes, again I agree. But agreeing on the foundation is pleasant, no?William wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 3:12 pmI should think so, but it would be assumption to say we agree on the details, would you agree?Mae von H wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 1:42 amPerfect! I agree!William wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 8:06 pmI think that it is logically sound to conclude that The Universe is a created thing. That means that there is a creator.Mae von H wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 12:29 pmWell you used the word. What do you mean by it?William wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 11:39 amHow are you defining "beliefs"?Mae von H wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 5:39 amIf you have no beliefs, how are you a theist?William wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 2:59 am [Replying to Mae von H in post #8]
I think Natural Theism appears to be the most sensible position within the Theistic setting.what theology do you believe?
I have no beliefs so to speak, at least not religious ones.
If that qualifies as belief, then that is what I believe.
Oh!
What fun we have!
Walking the walk...