The real teachings of Jesus

[kjw47]

8) real teachings from Jesus found in every translation on earth--clearly shows who he is with

1) Matthew 6:33-Therefore keep on seeking- FIRST- the kingdom and his ( YHWH(Jehovah) righteousness and all these things will be added( sustenance, covering, spirituality) Matt 6

2) Matthew 5:5- Blessed are the meek( great crowd) for they will inherit the earth

3) The Lords prayer-- Hallowed be thy(Father) name= YHWH(Jehovah) in some translations-last line-the kingdom, power and glory are all the Fathers.

4)At John 17:1-6,26--Verse 3- This means eternal life, their knowing you( Father) THE ONLY TRUE GOD and the one whom you sent forth Christ Jesus--verse 6 = YHWH(Jehovah) verse 26= YHWH(Jehovah)-----2 major points here-Jesus said the Father is the only true God and that God sent him, God did not come down here.

5) At John 20:17-Jesus tells all the Father is his God just like ours and reaffirms that while back in heaven at Revelation 3:12---Paul teaches that fact-1Cor 15:24-28, Coll 1:3, Eph 1:13,17, as does Peter-1Peter1:3

6) At John 4:22-24-Jesus begins by warning all other Gods are false, then teaches--the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth--Paul does the same at 1 Cor 8:5-6--Warns of false Gods then names only the Father as God.

7)Jesus gives this warning at John 15:20-21--He says--some will do things against the true worshippers on account of his name( meaning they think they are standing up for his name) Why??? Because they do not know the one who sent him=Father-THE ONLY TRUE GOD

8)At Matthew 28:18- All authority has been given me in heaven and on earth---If Jesus were God he would of already had the authority, but its clear reasoning that someone superior gave to him that authority.

Its not very hard to see who is who once they actually know what Jesus teaches. All his real teachers teach exactly what he taught.


With your free will, who will you believe?

[onewithhim]

[Replying to onewithhim in post #50]

How often does Jesus specifically mention Gods Kingdome is within?

He mentions it once in those words.

How often in all other words, does Jesus mention the kingdom of God?

It has already been shown that he meant that he, as the designated King, was there within the crowd.

Then we would expect it to read "The King of God is in your midst."

The New American Standard Bible does say "The kingdom of God is in your midst." Pointing to Jesus as the King of that kingdom.

[William]

[Replying to onewithhim in post #50]

How often does Jesus specifically mention Gods Kingdome is within?

He mentions it once in those words.

How often in all other words, does Jesus mention the kingdom of God?

It has already been shown that he meant that he, as the designated King, was there within the crowd.

Then we would expect it to read "The King of God is in your midst."

The New American Standard Bible does say "The kingdom of God is in your midst." Pointing to Jesus as the King of that kingdom.

Likely due to indoctrination I see you are unable to address the finer aspects of my overall points.

[Replying to onewithhim in post #50]

How often does Jesus specifically mention Gods Kingdome is within?

He mentions it once in those words.

How often in all other words, does Jesus mention the kingdom of God?

It has already been shown that he meant that he, as the designated King, was there within the crowd.

Then we would expect it to read "The King of God is in your midst."
"The Kingdom" covers a much broader spectrum and re the human psyche, embodies the goings on within the individual. Ones inner kingdom can be divided (without a suitable King ruling - a kingdom divided will not stand) which is significant to Jesus telling his followers to take his words into their psyches and allowing these to have their effect within the core of their being.

If it were as your indoctrination tells it, (and attempts to tell others) the eventual physical absence of said king, would have meant the the kingdom of god was no longer in the human domain and thus the seed sown would have perished.

But it didn't, so your indoctrination is incorrect.

[Difflugia]

There was a definite reference to the fact that Jesus was "in their midst,"

It has already been shown

"Definite reference?" "Already been shown?"

The Greek word ἐντὸς is a word that means "inside of" in a broad range of senses. Luke 17:21 is ambiguous enough that the Kingdom could be inside of each, inside of some, or in the midst of a group of people hearing or reading the proclamation. It can mean "within you" in just about any way you can imagine.

Lexicon entry for ἐντὸς.

The only thing you've shown is that you're extremely confident in your interpretation, but that you have no reason to be.

[onewithhim]

There was a definite reference to the fact that Jesus was "in their midst,"

It has already been shown

"Definite reference?" "Already been shown?"

The Greek word ἐντὸς is a word that means "inside of" in a broad range of senses. Luke 17:21 is ambiguous enough that the Kingdom could be inside of each, inside of some, or in the midst of a group of people hearing or reading the proclamation. It can mean "within you" in just about any way you can imagine.

Lexicon entry for ἐντὸς.

The only thing you've shown is that you're extremely confident in your interpretation, but that you have no reason to be.

Hold on....you said yourself that the word could mean "in the midst of a group of people hearing or reading the proclamation." This is exactly what I have been saying.

[Difflugia]

Hold on....you said yourself that the word could mean "in the midst of a group of people hearing or reading the proclamation." This is exactly what I have been saying.

No, you've been saying that's what it does mean, as though you have some way to be certain of it. You claimed a "definite reference," remember?

[onewithhim]

Hold on....you said yourself that the word could mean "in the midst of a group of people hearing or reading the proclamation." This is exactly what I have been saying.

No, you've been saying that's what it does mean, as though you have some way to be certain of it. You claimed a "definite reference," remember?

According to what you yourself posted, what I've been saying cannot be discounted.