The meaning of "Pro-Life"

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
perfessor
Scholar
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Illinois

The meaning of "Pro-Life"

Post #1

Post by perfessor »

It seems to me, watching the news and listening to debates on the abortion issue, that the term "pro-life" has acquired a very limited meaning - as if its adherents were using it as a code word for "anti-abortion".

I consider myself to be pro-life, and here is my (personal) definition:

Against abortion
Against capital punishment
Against war (any war, any time, so this includes Iraq)
Against nuclear testing, armament, re-armament, etc.
Against unrestricted gun ownership
In favor of beating swords into plowshares (as opposed to a foreign policy of providing weapons as a means of support)

I am not opposed to euthanasia, as this includes a quality-of-life decision which can be made by the person.

Oddly, most pro-lifers I talk to only hold one of the above beliefs (guess which one!).

What do YOU think? If you are pro-life, how about those other issues? And what does your priest / pastor / rabbi say about it?
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

User avatar
ST88
Site Supporter
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: The meaning of "Pro-Life"

Post #2

Post by ST88 »

perfessor wrote:It seems to me, watching the news and listening to debates on the abortion issue, that the term "pro-life" has acquired a very limited meaning - as if its adherents were using it as a code word for "anti-abortion".
I think you're right about this. However, it's my historical recollection that the term "pro-life" was actually coined to oppose "pro-choice", which itself was only appied to the issue of abortion.

To make the opposition to a positive term, "pro-" something, instead of using "anti-choice" they thought up something equally positive, "pro-life" and meant for it to specifically refer to abortion.

Later, the left-wing started using "pro-life" as a blunt instrument against the "pro-lifers" by implying that the term should apply to other situations where "life" should be held in a higher regard than it was, such as the ones you describe. So the only quibble I would have is your assertion that "pro-life" has acquired a very limited meaning. In my recollection, it started with this narrow definition and was expanded by others.

Correct me if I'm wrong on my history, I'm just not that old. (I should say I'm not quite that old.)

ed to add: I'm pro-choice & I have no official sages to guide me. ('cept Corvus :) )

User avatar
perfessor
Scholar
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Illinois

Post #3

Post by perfessor »

ST88 wrote:
I think you're right about this. However, it's my historical recollection that the term "pro-life" was actually coined to oppose "pro-choice", which itself was only appied to the issue of abortion.
You are right about this - the term "pro-choice" is also somewhat orwellian.
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

User avatar
Corvus
Guru
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:59 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The meaning of "Pro-Life"

Post #4

Post by Corvus »

ST88 wrote: ed to add: I'm pro-choice & I have no official sages to guide me. ('cept Corvus :) )
Hah! That's very kind, but I'm afraid that it's probable I will only lead you into perdition. Besides, my pride is far too inflated to have you swell it more. Pride is a good thing, however, in moderate amounts. It's appalling what goes on with the most ruthless honesty on our streets!



The term pro-choice is misleading. But I believe, for an anti-abortionist, to not hold to the rest of your list would not be an inconsistent position that weakens their argument. They are valuing an innocent and potential life above one already realised, one which has the choice of whether to to sacrifice itself for a cause or not, as in the case of war and punishment. Not to say there isn't "collateral damage" in war, but they can be considered a means to a "noble" end.

(Reminds me of a fantastic piece of dialogue in Full Metal Jacket, where a soldier is being interviewed during the Vietnam war, and says about the natives, "Personally, I think, uh ... they don't really want to be involved in this war. I mean ... they sort of took away our freedom and gave it to the, to the gookers, you know. But they don't want it. They'd rather be alive than free, I guess. Poor dumb bastards.)
<i>'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.

nikolayevich
Scholar
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Vancouver

Post #5

Post by nikolayevich »

Just reading this thread now... a little late of course :?

I think the most accurate way to couch it, is that Pro-Life and Pro-Choice are seen equally as euphemisms by their opposing camps. It goes both ways. Much like Republican/Democrat...

User avatar
hannahjoy
Apprentice
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Greenville, SC

Post #6

Post by hannahjoy »

Every definition of "pro-life" I've seen is limited to the issue of abortion, and that's what I mean when I can myself "pro-life." If you're going to redefine it, then I'll have to be more explicit.
I think the most accurate way to couch it, is that Pro-Life and Pro-Choice are seen equally as euphemisms by their opposing camps. It goes both ways. Much like Republican/Democrat...
I agree - just stick with "pro-abortion" and "anti-abortion." But then, "abortion" itself is a euphemism.
"Bearing shame and scoffing rude,
In my place condemned He stood;
Sealed my pardon with His blood;
Hallelujah! What a Saviour!"
- Philip P. Bliss, 1838-1876

User avatar
BeHereNow
Site Supporter
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 2 times

Post #7

Post by BeHereNow »

Hannajoy:
I agree - just stick with "pro-abortion" and "anti-abortion.
I believe the meaning of anti-abortion is self evident, but would you define your usage of the term “pro-abortion”.
Thanks
A special transmission outside the scriptures;
Depending not on words and letters;
Pointing directly to the human mind;
Seeing into one''s nature, one becomes a Buddha.

User avatar
BeHereNow
Site Supporter
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 2 times

Post #8

Post by BeHereNow »

Hannajoy: I agree - just stick with "pro-abortion" and "anti-abortion.
I believe the meaning of anti-abortion is self evident, but would you define your understanding of the term “pro-abortion”.
Thanks
A special transmission outside the scriptures;
Depending not on words and letters;
Pointing directly to the human mind;
Seeing into one''s nature, one becomes a Buddha.

User avatar
hannahjoy
Apprentice
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Greenville, SC

Post #9

Post by hannahjoy »

I believe the meaning of anti-abortion is self evident, but would you define your understanding of the term “pro-abortion”.
The view that abortion is not wrong, or should not be illegal.
"Bearing shame and scoffing rude,
In my place condemned He stood;
Sealed my pardon with His blood;
Hallelujah! What a Saviour!"
- Philip P. Bliss, 1838-1876

User avatar
BeHereNow
Site Supporter
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 2 times

Post #10

Post by BeHereNow »

hannajoy:

Works for me.
The connotation of the term is that someone advocates abortions, which of couse would not be true. I dislike terms which have a meaning different than their connotation, thus I am opposed to your suggestion.

Post Reply