A neat Mathematical connection

Chat viewable by general public

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Excubis
Sage
Posts: 616
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:56 am
Location: (nowhere you probaly heard of) Saskatchewan, Canada

A neat Mathematical connection

Post #1

Post by Excubis »

Here is a dream I had couple weeks ago.
1) If you plot all perfect squares on a number line the number(elements) of numbers that separate them increase by 2, starting at 0.
2) Now if you take that number of elements(numbers) that separate perfect squares and divide that # by 2, and plot that quotient(answer), again on new number line you get all whole numbers.
example:
0,1..4....9......16........25..........36.............49..............64................81..................100....................121
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (amount, of dots or numbers between each perfect square.
/2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 (divide by 2)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (answers)

I have personally done this to 4000 it works and is consistent. Just a neat connection to those interested in such things. Yes it is related to square of squares from Pythagoras. :tongue:

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A neat Mathematical connection

Post #2

Post by McCulloch »

[Replying to post 1 by Excubis]

So for the nth square number, the number of dots to the next square is

(n+1)^2 - n^2 - 1
The final minus one because you are counting neither endpoint.
Expanding:
=n^2+2n+1-n^2-1
=2n
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Excubis
Sage
Posts: 616
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:56 am
Location: (nowhere you probaly heard of) Saskatchewan, Canada

Re: A neat Mathematical connection

Post #3

Post by Excubis »


User avatar
bluethread
Savant
Posts: 9129
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm

Post #4

Post by bluethread »

That is the nature of two dimensional geometry. Though my high school math teacher would scold me for doing this, in this case, visualizing the geometry shows that the algebra is not surprising. When on adds 1 to the number squared, one is adding one layer to two sides of the geometric square, with one unit overlapping on the corner. So, the natural result is that the difference is always 2 times the smaller number plus one, or two times the larger number minus one.

Post Reply