The Psychology of Religiosity

[A17]

Matter does not come from randomness, people can create matter by having massless photon molecules interact with each other. The only way that could happen before a Big Bang would be a being enacting that, and the double slit experiment proves observation effects particles. Therefore God with his will created matter (which is simply vibrations, and that has been confirmed scientifically, as well as by Einstein).

One thing to not believe in someone's belief about God but God is definitely real. There was a video on a split brain person, the right hemisphere was theist and the left was atheist which people may believe to validate the theory that man made God, but the left hemisphere of the brain associates with cravings of food and sexual desires and food and sex are real. If the right hemisphere is creative and spacial and believes in God, that proves man was biologically made with the belief in God, and that is what has been believed for many years through humanity.

Our ancestors may not have had as much technology but that does not automatically make all of their beliefs false, albeit that does not mean they are always right. They were smart enough to get by in the wilderness without guns or high-tech gear. Take someone from a first world country and see if they can do that. Yet people call them stupid...

Belief in the Creator is not unnatural. But people trust sociopaths who use that belief as a guise to do unlawful(morally) acts, like mass suicide and that word faith or w.e that got a bunch of people to 'sow their seed' of a bunch of money which contributed to the economic crisis.

If you look at a sociopath, they have an inclination but not eternally absolute one, to act selfishly which has lead to many problems in humanity, as they infiltrate and take positions then screw up the world.

Also I have found that exercising sociopathic acts seems to make the condition worse, and sociopath's have abnormal brain wave activity. While Tibetan monks for example, who have higher than average Gamma brainwaves and a bigger corpus callosum in contrast to regular people.

Nature does not accept abnormal behavior, and an example would be sociopathic mentality. The more power they get the more they want, the more money the more they want hence the phrase 'cursed above all cattle'. The cycle seems to continue and is referred to in Buddhism as 'samsara' which is like continual death. That is psychological/spiritual(either word is correct).

Quantum physics has testified that matter is not really absolute and we are in a sort of simulated world that is like an illusion like Einstein expressed. So I am not sure if seeing this all as a game is incorrect. Having that approach perhaps makes life seem more like an activity to get good at. Sadly however, the sociopath way is like setting oneself up for destruction and God does not reward sociopaths with game clearance. The point of the game is to attain Nirvana/Psychological harmony or become 'filled with the Holy Spirit', basically to be tolerant and have exceedingly high agape love. So getting by doing bad stuff just gives bad karma.

As for the Big Bang, you may be aware that space which has significantly less gravity than earth has time dilation, and perhaps you are aware of gravitational time dilation, which really indicates that time and gravity are correlated. Gravity has to do with the concentration of neutrons in an area, and before the Big Bang there was no matter(matter being compositions with the neutron) so time is an invention that came with the neutron, and anxiety has a relation with weight gain, I am not sure if you are aware of that. There is a connection. Anxious people have lower alpha brainwaves, increased beta brainwaves, and that is while they are awake. When asleep the order is in reverse and what ideally should happen is higher alpha and lowered beta compared to an anxious patient.

Interestingly enough, that pattern is common with sociopaths. Sociopathy is neurosis. So the motive for the game is to inherit from God:

'For God has not given us a spirit of fear(anxiety/sociopathy which is associated with abnormal brain waves), but of power(strong mental fortitude, and courage) and love(proper gamma waves which are associated with healthy brain wave activity), and of sound mind'. - 2 Timothy 1:7

Thoughts and actions affect karma. The point of the game is to attain Nirvana(indifference to suffering and pleasure and agape love) which is like a state of inner joy. That is relative to this:

Do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength.- from Nehemiah 8:10

[Jashwell]

Matter does not come from randomness, people can create matter by having massless photon molecules interact with each other. The only way that could happen before a Big Bang would be a being enacting that, and the double slit experiment proves observation effects particles. Therefore God with his will created matter (which is simply vibrations, and that has been confirmed scientifically, as well as by Einstein).

Einstein didn't believe in quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics does not use the term 'observer' to refer to a person or similar being.
A being wouldn't be necessary anyway.

One thing to not believe in someone's belief about God but God is definitely real. There was a video on a split brain person, the right hemisphere was theist and the left was atheist which people may believe to validate the theory that man made God, but the left hemisphere of the brain associates with cravings of food and sexual desires and food and sex are real. If the right hemisphere is creative and spacial and believes in God, that proves man was biologically made with the belief in God, and that is what has been believed for many years through humanity.

Split brain patients can have conflicting beliefs. Including one hemisphere being a theist and the other an atheist. (This seems profoundly disconcerting for dualism - as VS Ramachandran puts it, "Does one hemisphere go to heaven and the other go to hell?".)

This doesn't mean that in everyone, one hemisphere is a theist and the other isn't, and if it did that wouldn't confirm the existence of a God.

Our ancestors may not have had as much technology but that does not automatically make all of their beliefs false, albeit that does not mean they are always right.

What makes many of their beliefs false are profound disconnections with the real world. Just because there beliefs aren't automatically false, doesn't mean that they aren't false at all. At the very least, they're almost entirely unjustified.

They were smart enough to get by in the wilderness without guns or high-tech gear. Take someone from a first world country and see if they can do that. Yet people call them stupid...

First, we don't live in the wilderness, and second, neither did the writers of the Bible. We live in cities and towns.

Progress does not mean those in the past were superior. The overwhelming majority of 8 year olds know more today about the real world than some of the smartest people alive knew just 500 years ago. That's just knowledge - there's also health, social issues, economy, industry, etc.

If they knew better, do you think they would have lived as they did?

Compared to people alive today, people that lived thousands of years ago are stupid and ignorant (unknowing not unwilling to know) of the real world. Incredibly so.

A famous Greek mathematician, sometimes called the father of algebra, considered negative numbers and irrational square roots to be absurd and meaningless.

Nature does not accept abnormal behavior, and an example would be sociopathic mentality. The more power they get the more they want, the more money the more they want hence the phrase 'cursed above all cattle'. The cycle seems to continue and is referred to in Buddhism as 'samsara' which is like continual death. That is psychological/spiritual(either word is correct).

No, the concept of Samsara refers to a cycle of reincarnation. Those who do have good karma are reincarnated 'up', those with bad karma are reincarnated 'down'. (Cattle would probably be considered 'down' from humans. Choice of up/down is mine, but there's an implication of superiority and inferiority.)

Most don't believe in reincarnation.

Quantum physics has testified that matter is not really absolute and we are in a sort of simulated world that is like an illusion like Einstein expressed. So I am not sure if seeing this all as a game is incorrect. Having that approach perhaps makes life seem more like an activity to get good at. Sadly however, the sociopath way is like setting oneself up for destruction and God does not reward sociopaths with game clearance. The point of the game is to attain Nirvana/Psychological harmony or become 'filled with the Holy Spirit', basically to be tolerant and have exceedingly high agape love. So getting by doing bad stuff just gives bad karma.

No, nirvana (similar to Hinduism's Moksha) is escaping Samsara, the cycle of birth and death, by attaining perfection/eliminating deficiencies. (Many Buddhists consider things like desire to be imperfections.)

Gravity has to do with the concentration of neutrons in an area

Gravity has to do with the concentration of mass. Neutrons have mass... so do protons.

and before the Big Bang there was no matter

An unsubstantiated claim.

(matter being compositions with the neutron)

Protons are considered matter. They aren't compositions of neutrons.

so time is an invention that came with the neutron

This is flatly false.

and anxiety has a relation with weight gain, I am not sure if you are aware of that. There is a connection. Anxious people have lower alpha brainwaves, increased beta brainwaves, and that is while they are awake. When asleep the order is in reverse and what ideally should happen is higher alpha and lowered beta compared to an anxious patient.

Anxious people also might eat more. Which do you think is more direct in causing weight gain?

'For God has not given us a spirit of fear(anxiety/sociopathy which is associated with abnormal brain waves), but of power(strong mental fortitude, and courage) and love(proper gamma waves which are associated with healthy brain wave activity), and of sound mind'. - 2 Timothy 1:7

Flagrant over-interpretation, you're reading more into the passage than is reasonable.

Thoughts and actions affect karma. The point of the game is to attain Nirvana(indifference to suffering and pleasure and agape love) which is like a state of inner joy. That is relative to this:

Christianity and Buddhism are VERY different.

[A17]

''No, the concept of Samsara refers to a cycle of reincarnation. Those who do have good karma are reincarnated 'up', those with bad karma are reincarnated 'down'. (Cattle would probably be considered 'down' from humans. Choice of up/down is mine, but there's an implication of superiority and inferiority.)

Most don't believe in reincarnation. ''

The Mahayana school of Buddhism views both Nirvana and Samsara as mental representations.

''(matter being compositions with the neutron)''

With the neutron. Compositions with the neutron. Not only. The neutron has no electric charge, and that is why 'things' are physically there. The lack of electric charge. Chemicals with more neutrons in contrast to proton/electron are heavier and are more resistant to electricity. Protons have positive electric charge and electrons have negative electric charge, while neutrons have none. Proton/Electron are push/pull while neutrons determine stagnation. What is called 'matter' is only physical because of that factor of stagnation. Matter is used to define 'physical substance'.

''so time is an invention that came with the neutron''

If you look at gravitational time dilation, air spaces with less neutrons/more gaseous air spaces have a different time rate than a more dense airspace. Like space vs earth for example. So, before there was any 'lightness or heaviness' balanced by the factor of stagnation, which the neutron represents, there was no slow or fast, there was no time.

''Christianity and Buddhism are VERY different.''

The teachings of Yehoshua and Buddha are very similar.

''and before the Big Bang there was no matter.''

The Big Bang is an event where matter was created, which came to be because of the neutron becoming real and mixing with proton/electron to make physical substances. The one behind that was God.

''This doesn't mean that in everyone, one hemisphere is a theist and the other isn't, and if it did that wouldn't confirm the existence of a God. ''

One hemisphere excels at detail, labels, sequential process etc. and the other holistic, principals and concepts. One hemisphere is associated with emotion/spirituality and the other associated with the opposite. One hemisphere is not useless, people are biologically wired to meet their needs.

''Einstein didn't believe in quantum mechanics. ''

The comment I made was in reference to vibrations.

[Jashwell]

The Mahayana school of Buddhism views both Nirvana and Samsara as mental representations.

I'm not aware that this is the case?

''(matter being compositions with the neutron)''

With the neutron. Compositions with the neutron. Not only.

Compositions without neutrons can still be matter.
Protons are matter. Protons are not compositions with neutrons.

The neutron has no electric charge, and that is why 'things' are physically there. The lack of electric charge.

This makes very little sense and doesn't seem to remotely resemble physics or chemistry.
Further, you don't need neutrons for a lack of charge. Ignoring the other particles that lack electric charge (neutrinos for instance).

Atoms with equally more protons and electrons, but with equal or less neutrons, will still lack charge but will be more massive.

Chemicals with more neutrons in contrast to proton/electron are heavier and are more resistant to electricity.

'More resistant to electricity' ?
Atoms with more neutrons are heavier, and so are atoms with more protons and other massive (i.e. not without mass) particles.

Protons have positive electric charge and electrons have negative electric charge, while neutrons have none. Proton/Electron are push/pull while neutrons determine stagnation. What is called 'matter' is only physical because of that factor of stagnation. Matter is used to define 'physical substance'.

'stagnation'? What does that have to do with anything?

Matter is typically used to refer to particles with mass (e.g. protons), while energy is used to refer to particles without mass (e.g. photons).

''so time is an invention that came with the neutron''

If you look at gravitational time dilation, air spaces with less neutrons/more gaseous air spaces have a different time rate than a more dense airspace.

Anywhere with less mass will have a 'hastened' time rate. (Again, not just neutrons.)

Like space vs earth for example. So, before there was any 'lightness or heaviness' balanced by the factor of stagnation, which the neutron represents, there was no slow or fast, there was no time.

.. no.
First, this has nothing to do with neutrons specifically.
Even rest-massless particles like photons have energy and hence relativistic mass.

Second, gravity slows the rate at which time passes, so why do you think without it time would stop?

Third, why would there be no time?

''Christianity and Buddhism are VERY different.''
The teachings of Yehoshua and Buddha are very similar.

Without tenuous over-interpretation?

''and before the Big Bang there was no matter.''

The Big Bang is an event where matter was created, which came to be because of the neutron becoming real and mixing with proton/electron to make physical substances. The one behind that was God.

No evidence is given for:
- There was a time 'before the big bang'
- Matter only existed after the big bang
- God did it

It has nothing to do with "the neutron becoming real" - neutrons were, no doubt, formed... from pre-existing quarks. (Whether or not quarks existed before the big bang I have no idea.) Neutrons aren't fundamental, they're quark compositions (u,d,d). Protons were also formed. The combination of protons and neutrons (nucleosynthesis, the formation of an atomic nucleus) is nothing special, and electrons binding to nuclei even less so.

''This doesn't mean that in everyone, one hemisphere is a theist and the other isn't, and if it did that wouldn't confirm the existence of a God. ''

One hemisphere excels at detail, labels, sequential process etc. and the other holistic, principals and concepts. One hemisphere is associated with emotion/spirituality and the other associated with the opposite. One hemisphere is not useless, people are biologically wired to meet their needs.

'Spirituality' is so vaguely defined that 'emotion' itself is what some people would consider spirituality. I don't care for the exact specifics, but this in no way substantiates your point.

''Einstein didn't believe in quantum mechanics. ''

The comment I made was in reference to vibrations.

So, of your beliefs, you reference what he accepts but omit what he doesn't?

[A17]

[Replying to Jashwell]

''So, of your beliefs, you reference what he accepts but omit what he doesn't?''

I was referring to his confirmation of vibrations not quantum physics. Check the brackets of my post.

''Matter is typically used to refer to particles with mass (e.g. protons), while energy is used to refer to particles without mass (e.g. photons). ''

With complete absence of the neutron which has no electric charge, it wouldn't be matter. A photon is mass-less and is completely neutral electrically, and is everywhere. Protons are positive charge(think of push) Electrons are negative(think of pull), and neutrons shoot for a spot in between those spectrums which go to infinity. A photon has 0 neutrons and would be push+pull simultaneously, which would be stagnation, because the positive and negative electric charges are both unrestrained and there is no neutron to produce the effect of gravity. Photons are stagnant and mass-less and everywhere, having infinite positive and infinite negative electric charge, being electromagnetism.

The neutron when introduced to an atom resists the electromagnetism and the weight depends on the amount of positive in contrast to negative charge. If you look at oxygen the composition is 8 electron/proton/neutron and has atomic mass of like 16. Calcium is 20 electron/protons and 20 neutrons, and has an atomic mass of around 40. 2.5x different in atomic mass and particle count between them. Calcium is oxygen multiplied. The positive charge force represented as 8 and negative charge force represented as 8 is met with 8 neutrons but when the forces of positive/negative charge are higher by 2.5x the product's mass is multiplied by 2.5x because the stronger the force that is equalized the stronger the equalizer.

So if those numbers became 8 electron/proton and absolute 0 neutron then that would no longer be matter. That would be energy. If the numbers were 20 electron/proton absolute 0 neutrons that would not be matter, that would be energy. The opposite charges that are at equivalent degree would be electromagnetism. Not matter, electromagnetism which is energy and represented by the word photon.

''.. no.
First, this has nothing to do with neutrons specifically.
Even rest-massless particles like photons have energy and hence relativistic mass.

Second, gravity slows the rate at which time passes, so why do you think without it time would stop?

Third, why would there be no time? ''

There would be no past or future there would only be present because the Universe would be pure electromagnetism and that(pure electromagnetism) would be unaffected by time and gravity. Time is distance/velocity. A Universe purely electromagnetism has no distance/velocity because electromagnetism has no speed or velocity, electromagnetism is a limitless field and would be everywhere.

The quarks are electrical charges, which have not been observed but inferred, and those came from a being's will. The atom was configured not poofed from nowhere. Neutron mass is a constant while proton/electron are charges. They are not visible. They are thus not physical. Their influence has been [attempted to be] quantified in numbers. Neutron is the 'neutral factor' which is the resistance placed in between the positive and negative charge and matter is the result of where ever the neutron is inclined to whatever measure(electromagnetism is related to density).

[Excubis]

[Replying to post 5 by A17]

Well first off hydrogen has no neutron only a proton an it has mass and an electron. Not sure where you got information on no neutron no mass so therefore energy and not matter, but it is incorrect. Deuterium with one proton and one neutron, mass number equals 2. Also free neutron have a mass and current Isospin evidence is showing that Neutron and Protons are transitional version of each other. Mass is given by the higgs or subsequent higgs field, all current accepted models attribute mass to the higgs or as Newton summarized "hand of God".

Yes neutrons are slightly heavier than protons but are not cause of mass or matter. Neutrons are matter and energy since it can lose and gain mass dependent on quarks taste. Massless particles such as bosons(photons) are never at rest or still, bosons appear moving between frames without extracting or leaving energy or gravity, this is why they have a energy mass of 0. Then there are fermions that can be massless as well but do interact with other ferimons and bosons and can gain a mass and therefore become not at rest. There are two ways of being massless, be completely still or never be still at all, both interact with matter but one effects matters mass other does not. It is thought that ferimons are what matters(mass) but bosons give the ability for matter to ineract(energy).

Now as for everything being by a God well no way to disprove but also nothing to as well other than a persons feelings or experience. I do not think so because when they say nothing they mean a value of 0 that from arose everything else. This is why each sum off all matter,energy,divided by gravity = 0 all are transitional forms of original 0 value set or empty set(time).

[A17]

[Replying to post 6 by Excubis]

Well yes, no neutron no matter.

Allegedly: ''Naturally-occurring hydrogen consists of less than 1% deuterium.''

The proton electrons neutrons are scaled, they go up and down up to infinity so being in decimals is not impossible. Hydrogen allegedly has deuterium which has a neutron, therefore there is a fraction of a neutron in Hydrogen. Particles shrink and expand but do not have absolute values they vibrate. The compositions very based on how the atom is made. There is a degree of the neutron in Hydrogen as science has accepted. The stuff is on a scale. Expands and shrinks. For certain degrees of expansion they are labelled with numbers so people can relate to the state better. With the absence of the neutron which is electronically neutral there is no gravity but the composition would be an electromagnetism.

[Excubis]

[Replying to post 7 by A17]

Well no I was incorrect it is protium that has no neutron, not deuterium which nucleus is called a deuteron and has 1 proton and 1 neutron. There is 0 evidence for protium which is the most abundant form of hydrogen with mass number of 1 has anything akin to a neutron. http://www.chem.mun.ca/homes/hjchome/c2 ... /forms.htm

H1(protium) makes up 99.8% of all natural hydrogen isotopes, the other is deuterium(D2), and then there's the radioactive isotope T3(tritium). Science has not accepted a neutron in H1 isotope, it's spin is 1/2 since lacking a neutron.

Honestly thought someone would catch that one.

[A17]

[Replying to Excubis]

Protium still has the neutrino, a smaller form of the neutron. Neutrino/Neutron are the same concept with different degree. You can say protium has no neutron and you can say it does. The concept has not become big enough to be a full neutron but has a part of neutron since its a smaller version. Like comparing 10 and 1 for example. If neutron is 10 and neutrino is one(just an example) then one can say 1/10th of neutron is in protium(just an example don't take the ratio). That is the idea. Lacking a complete neutron but has a fraction of one. If the negative charge is 0 then the positive charge would be 0 and there would be only electromagnetism. Every form of matter is positively or negatively charged. Electromagnetism is both simultaneously.

[Excubis]

[Replying to post 9 by A17]

Sorry a Neutron is more similar to a proton than to a neutrino, commonality ends in the name. A neutron is a nucleon and a neutrino in a lepton, neutrons are mad up of an up and down quark and a neutrino's are produced by nuclear reactions and are found in cosmic radiation, it is a elementary particle. Neutrinos can also be produced by radioactive decay, and Protium has nothing to do with neutrino's, T3 could potentiality produce some, but they are not part of a atom like neutrons, proton, quarks, ect....