hello, i'm whatsit and i just joined 30 minutes ago.
i'm a male, 59 years old.
i'm not what you would call a "bible thumper" and don't go to church.
i'm undecided in regards to a god.
the major reasons i joined:
1. i have a lot of time on my hands.
2. i believe i have information that needs to be heard.
i also believe that evolution isn't the fact you might think it is.
i've uncovered stuff that i never knew existed.
so, if you like a good debate on evolution or would just like to hear what i have to say, then reply here and let me know.
peace
new member
Moderator: Moderators
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: new member
Post #2Welcome to the forums.whatsit wrote: i also believe that evolution isn't the fact you might think it is.
i've uncovered stuff that i never knew existed.
so, if you like a good debate on evolution or would just like to hear what i have to say, then reply here and let me know.
peace
I'm sure you'll get a lot of people willing to debate evolution with you. I'm personally not interested because I'm already confident with the overwhelming evidence that already exists for it. I feel confident that everything you have to offer can easily be debunked before I've even heard it.
In fact, if you had anything that truly had any meat you'd be far better off presenting it to the scientific community rather than an Internet forum that debates religions.
The mere fact that you would like to debate it on a religion forum already suggests religious bias.
And finally, even if evolution could be brought into question (something that isn't even remotely likely) that still wouldn't loan support to the Biblical picture of God. The Biblical picture of God has so many failings I would reject it even if we couldn't explain how life evolved.
In the meantime welcome to the forums, and I'm sure you'll find someone who will entertain your ideas.
The typical way to do that is to start a thread specifically addressing the topic you would like to debate and entitle the thread appropriately. If you could outline your claims in your OP with a specific question all the better.
Had you actually done that I might have at least answered your question.

Enjoy the forums.
[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]
- Neatras
- Guru
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:44 pm
- Location: Oklahoma, US
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: new member
Post #3[Replying to post 1 by whatsit]
If you feel you have evidence to present, I recommend you make a separate thread for this evidence to have a spotlight view. Preferably in the Science subforum.
If you feel you have evidence to present, I recommend you make a separate thread for this evidence to have a spotlight view. Preferably in the Science subforum.
- ttruscott
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 11064
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
- Location: West Coast of Canada
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: new member
Post #4[Replying to post 1 by whatsit]
Welcome.
I see you have no tokens yet so here are a dew to get you started,
You can look them up on the faq page.
Peace, Ted
Welcome.
I see you have no tokens yet so here are a dew to get you started,

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...
We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.
This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.
We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.
This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Post #5
.
Welcome to the Forum.
Do you wish to debate based upon the information to which you refer or just talk about it? Notice that some sub-forums are intended for debate and others for discussion. Random Ramblings is set aside for presentation of ideas which do not fit in other categories and/or are personal opinion pieces.
Feel free to start threads where appropriate after reading Forum Rules and the Guidelines for various sub-forums.
__________
Moderator clarifications do not count as a strike against any posters. They serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received and/or are given at the discretion of a moderator when he or she feels a clarification of the rules is required.
Moderator Clarificationwhatsit wrote: i believe i have information that needs to be heard.
i also believe that evolution isn't the fact you might think it is.
i've uncovered stuff that i never knew existed.
so, if you like a good debate on evolution or would just like to hear what i have to say, then reply here and let me know.
Welcome to the Forum.
Do you wish to debate based upon the information to which you refer or just talk about it? Notice that some sub-forums are intended for debate and others for discussion. Random Ramblings is set aside for presentation of ideas which do not fit in other categories and/or are personal opinion pieces.
Feel free to start threads where appropriate after reading Forum Rules and the Guidelines for various sub-forums.
__________
Moderator clarifications do not count as a strike against any posters. They serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received and/or are given at the discretion of a moderator when he or she feels a clarification of the rules is required.
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Re: new member
Post #6thanksWelcome to the forums.
i'm willing.I'm sure you'll get a lot of people willing to debate evolution with you.
what "evidence" might that be?I'm personally not interested because I'm already confident with the overwhelming evidence that already exists for it.
science hasn't proved, nor demonstrated that atoms can assemble themselves into a living cell.
the fossil record is a joke of a mess.
the primate fossil tree is practically non existent
i don't know about that.I feel confident that everything you have to offer can easily be debunked before I've even heard it.
i have my doubts.
been there, done that.In fact, if you had anything that truly had any meat you'd be far better off presenting it to the scientific community rather than an Internet forum that debates religions.
they didn't like my sources, you know science and nature?
and the problem with that is what exactly?The mere fact that you would like to debate it on a religion forum already suggests religious bias.
will that make my respected science sources invalid?
correct.And finally, even if evolution could be brought into question (something that isn't even remotely likely) that still wouldn't loan support to the Biblical picture of God.
remember, YOU are the one that brought up god, not me
my "ideas" come directly from respected sources.In the meantime welcome to the forums, and I'm sure you'll find someone who will entertain your ideas.
the enrollment email suggested i post here first and tell the board a little about me.The typical way to do that is to start a thread specifically addressing the topic you would like to debate and entitle the thread appropriately. If you could outline your claims in your OP with a specific question all the better.
i don't really have a question.Had you actually done that I might have at least answered your question.
Enjoy the forums.
i want to "spread the word" about what i've found.
thanks for the welcome.
Re: new member
Post #7now that was really sweet of you, thanks man.ttruscott wrote: [Replying to post 1 by whatsit]
Welcome.
I see you have no tokens yet so here are a dew to get you started,You can look them up on the faq page.
Peace, Ted
i think i might like it here.
Post #8
i'm not exactly sure.Moderator Clarification
Welcome to the Forum.
Do you wish to debate based upon the information to which you refer or just talk about it?
if i try to just discuss this stuff, someone is going to try and "debunk" it.
i guess i can open a disussion thread and see where it goes.
i have no real desire to debate anything, only to post what i know.
okay, yesFeel free to start threads where appropriate after reading Forum Rules and the Guidelines for various sub-forums.
__________
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Post #9
Welcome, though you have been told where to post your views on specific topics, I think you will find that there are some here who word their responses to almost any topic such that they can ramble on about their pet peeves. Be careful not to copy them, or respond too bluntly, at least not in the beginning. Such tactics take a certain amount of nuance and are designed to elicit a negative response. Focus on your points and maybe search fallacies in wikipedia, so you can avoid using them and recognize them when they are used against you. Pointing out fallacies, or at least claiming others are using them, is a common past time around here.
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: new member
Post #10If they didn't accept your sources, then your sources don't have any scientific merit.whatsit wrote:been there, done that.In fact, if you had anything that truly had any meat you'd be far better off presenting it to the scientific community rather than an Internet forum that debates religions.
they didn't like my sources, you know science and nature?
But you obviously don't have any respected scientific sources remember? You already tried that and they rejected your sources.whatsit wrote:and the problem with that is what exactly?The mere fact that you would like to debate it on a religion forum already suggests religious bias.
will that make my respected science sources invalid?

Is this some form of evangelism?whatsit wrote:i don't really have a question.Had you actually done that I might have at least answered your question.
Enjoy the forums.
i want to "spread the word" about what i've found.
thanks for the welcome.

"Spread the Word" sure sounds evangelical to me.
Especially if you are attempting to 'spread the word' that even you confess has already been rejected by the scientific community as having questionable sources.
[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]