I am asking for your views. I believe this is a very difficult question to answer.
Suppose a girl goes into a hospital for a surgery. The doctor screws up the surgery so badly that the girl's heart and brain no longer function; however, the doctor is able to hook her up to a ventilator, which pumps blood for her and helps her get oxygen throughout her body. After several days the girl makes no recovery.
Would it be right for her to be unplugged?
Ethics in Medicine
Moderator: Moderators
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Re: Ethics in Medicine
Post #2Ideally, I think the ethics need to be worked out before she is hooked up. Once she is hooked up, the game of competing interests is inevitable.HawkSA16 wrote: I am asking for your views. I believe this is a very difficult question to answer.
Suppose a girl goes into a hospital for a surgery. The doctor screws up the surgery so badly that the girl's heart and brain no longer function; however, the doctor is able to hook her up to a ventilator, which pumps blood for her and helps her get oxygen throughout her body. After several days the girl makes no recovery.
Would it be right for her to be unplugged?
That is the problem with these questions. There are always at least two competing interests. It sounds cold, but the girl is no longer relevant. It is now a battle between the legal industrial complex and the medical industrial complex. Morality is then just a tool for each side to use in that battle. She will not be unplugged until her lawyer is able to extract every last penny from the doctor and the hospital, then absolutely. If the doctor had not screwed up the surgery, but the outcome was the same, she would not be unplugged until the hospital had extracted every last penny from the family or the government, then absolutely.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Ethics in Medicine
Post #3[Replying to post 1 by HawkSA16]
How to deal with the doctor may be difficult, but what's so difficult about the question of unplugging? Not only would it be right for her to be unplugged, it would be wrong to leave her plugged in. Brain dead? Then unplug, as simple as that.
How to deal with the doctor may be difficult, but what's so difficult about the question of unplugging? Not only would it be right for her to be unplugged, it would be wrong to leave her plugged in. Brain dead? Then unplug, as simple as that.
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #4
If her brain is not functioning, she is dead. Unplug as soon as any needed organs have been harvested.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Post #6
bluethread wrote:Yet another of the competing interests. Isn't keeping her "alive" long enough to harvest the organs literally ghoulish, if not cannibalistic?McCulloch wrote: If her brain is not functioning, she is dead. Unplug as soon as any needed organs have been harvested.
No. It is merciful and righteous. Take the perspective of those lives that would be saved or made much better. No need to waste goodness (living organs) and allow evil (malfunctioning organs). Reminds me of the work of Christ on the cross, to an extent.
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Post #7
Interesting use of the term evil. So, a person who has a heart attack has an evil heart? None the less, that is my point. The morality of the situation is dependent on the interests being served, ie the ends justify the means. What is interesting is that the family is not permitted to receive compensation for the organs to cover the medical costs.Hatuey wrote:bluethread wrote:Yet another of the competing interests. Isn't keeping her "alive" long enough to harvest the organs literally ghoulish, if not cannibalistic?McCulloch wrote: If her brain is not functioning, she is dead. Unplug as soon as any needed organs have been harvested.
No. It is merciful and righteous. Take the perspective of those lives that would be saved or made much better. No need to waste goodness (living organs) and allow evil (malfunctioning organs). Reminds me of the work of Christ on the cross, to an extent.
Post #8
bluethread wrote:Interesting use of the term evil. So, a person who has a heart attack has an evil heart? None the less, that is my point.
IF you like. The heart is malfunctioning and will cause loss of life (evil, I guess...right? or not good, whatever) and a "good" (not bad) heart will cause goodness instead of not goodness. How many different ways do we have to qualify the words?
Yep. Whoever the donor selects should profit from the SALE of his/her organs. It's only common sense.bluethread wrote:The morality of the situation is dependent on the interests being served, ie the ends justify the means. What is interesting is that the family is not permitted to receive compensation for the organs to cover the medical costs.
- heavensgate
- Apprentice
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:01 am
- Location: Coolum Beach
Re: Ethics in Medicine
Post #9Yes very difficult, and more so because I think medicine has advanced so much that it has blurred the line between life and death. If it is merely machines that are artificially prolonging life, then I suggest the decision maker could be at least satisfied that the natural course of life has already finished.HawkSA16 wrote: I am asking for your views. I believe this is a very difficult question to answer.
Suppose a girl goes into a hospital for a surgery. The doctor screws up the surgery so badly that the girl's heart and brain no longer function; however, the doctor is able to hook her up to a ventilator, which pumps blood for her and helps her get oxygen throughout her body. After several days the girl makes no recovery.
Would it be right for her to be unplugged?
Regards
Jim
- Peter
- Guru
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:46 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Ethics in Medicine
Post #10Of course. No brain function = no person. Your question couldn't be simpler unless you buy into the soul theory. If that's the case good luck. There's nothing quite as sad as a person being tormented over wished for but baseless beliefs.HawkSA16 wrote: I am asking for your views. I believe this is a very difficult question to answer.
Suppose a girl goes into a hospital for a surgery. The doctor screws up the surgery so badly that the girl's heart and brain no longer function; however, the doctor is able to hook her up to a ventilator, which pumps blood for her and helps her get oxygen throughout her body. After several days the girl makes no recovery.
Would it be right for her to be unplugged?
Religion is poison because it asks us to give up our most precious faculty, which is that of reason, and to believe things without evidence. It then asks us to respect this, which it calls faith. - Christopher Hitchens