Hello,
I recently was called an anti-mormon in a PM discussion even though the book of mormon was never even mentioned. Here are the difinitions for anti from dictionary.com:
–noun, plural -tis.
a person who is opposed to a particular practice, party, policy, action, etc.
a prefix meaning “against,� “opposite of,� “antiparticle of,� used in the formation of compound words ( anticline ); used freely in combination with elements of any origin ( antibody; antifreeze; antiknock; antilepton ).
For extra credit wouldn't an anti-mormon be someone or an organization which claims to believe in the book of mormon but has practices (like priestcraft) which are in direct violation of the book of mormon?
What is an anti-Mormon?
Moderator: Moderators
- sleepyhead
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:57 pm
- Location: Grass Valley CA
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #2
Semantics are pointless sometimes....Its the intention being conveyed that matters. So when someone is anti-whatever, its because they are opposed to whatever it is.
Whats the pont of this question? I get the feeling there is more to it than you let on the surface.
Whats the pont of this question? I get the feeling there is more to it than you let on the surface.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- sleepyhead
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:57 pm
- Location: Grass Valley CA
Post #3
Hello mormonboy,
First off, after rereading the PM I wasn't actually called an anti mormon.
The discussion was about some statements in the LDS branch of Mormonism in their journal of discourses, which indicated to me, that Brigham Young considered blood atonement a positive thing and that by extension the church most likely practiced blood atonement during BY's reign. Apparently the future leaders who followed BY and various historians now claim he didn't teach blood atonement.
Anyway are any statement that mormons consider negative, considered to be anti-mormon statements, and those making them anti-mormons.
Comparing this to the republican demonization of the term liberal, now that they have it demonized they can use it who supposts a position they don't like. To define anything they don't like rather than to what the liberal position would be. For example conservation, would be more conservative than liberal yet conservationist are viewed as liberal.
First off, after rereading the PM I wasn't actually called an anti mormon.
The discussion was about some statements in the LDS branch of Mormonism in their journal of discourses, which indicated to me, that Brigham Young considered blood atonement a positive thing and that by extension the church most likely practiced blood atonement during BY's reign. Apparently the future leaders who followed BY and various historians now claim he didn't teach blood atonement.
Anyway are any statement that mormons consider negative, considered to be anti-mormon statements, and those making them anti-mormons.
Comparing this to the republican demonization of the term liberal, now that they have it demonized they can use it who supposts a position they don't like. To define anything they don't like rather than to what the liberal position would be. For example conservation, would be more conservative than liberal yet conservationist are viewed as liberal.
May all your naps be joyous occasions.
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #4
No not at all, those statements would not be anti-mormon.sleepyhead wrote:Hello mormonboy,
First off, after rereading the PM I wasn't actually called an anti mormon.
The discussion was about some statements in the LDS branch of Mormonism in their journal of discourses, which indicated to me, that Brigham Young considered blood atonement a positive thing and that by extension the church most likely practiced blood atonement during BY's reign. Apparently the future leaders who followed BY and various historians now claim he didn't teach blood atonement.
Anyway are any statement that mormons consider negative, considered to be anti-mormon statements, and those making them anti-mormons.
Comparing this to the republican demonization of the term liberal, now that they have it demonized they can use it who supposts a position they don't like. To define anything they don't like rather than to what the liberal position would be. For example conservation, would be more conservative than liberal yet conservationist are viewed as liberal.
Anti-mormon would be people protesting our church events and gatherings. People who vandalize our churches, ect.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- sleepyhead
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:57 pm
- Location: Grass Valley CA