http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=6026
I strongly disagree with what john_anthony_gonzalez said in his post about never losing salvation. I challenge him to a one on one debate concerning the matter. With the Bible being considered infallible and as the basis of all arguements.
One on one john_anthony_gonzalez?
Moderator: Moderators
-
scottlittlefield17
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Maine USA
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: One on one john_anthony_gonzalez?
Post #2Givem heck scott. I doubt very seriously the referenced claim can be supported, either theologically, or in the "real world" of verifiable evidence.scottlittlefield17 wrote:http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=6026
I strongly disagree with what john_anthony_gonzalez said in his post about never losing salvation. I challenge him to a one on one debate concerning the matter. With the Bible being considered infallible and as the basis of all arguements.
Faith, works alone, or a combination of the two, I would challenge anyone who claims to know the mind of God.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
-
Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: One on one john_anthony_gonzalez?
Post #3Since that lat time John gonzalez showed up was november 2007, I don't think he will take you up on the challenge.scottlittlefield17 wrote:http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=6026
I strongly disagree with what john_anthony_gonzalez said in his post about never losing salvation. I challenge him to a one on one debate concerning the matter. With the Bible being considered infallible and as the basis of all arguements.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: One on one john_anthony_gonzalez?
Post #4LOL Good eye.goat wrote:Since that lat time John gonzalez showed up was november 2007, I don't think he will take you up on the challenge.scottlittlefield17 wrote:http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=6026
I strongly disagree with what john_anthony_gonzalez said in his post about never losing salvation. I challenge him to a one on one debate concerning the matter. With the Bible being considered infallible and as the basis of all arguements.
I wonder if anyone is up to what is now scott's challenge.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
