Definition of a Cult
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 1:46 am
Definition of a Cult
Post #1I didn't know which forum to put this in, so I took a guess. If I am wrong, I'm sorry in advance. Is there a general consensus as what separates a cult from a religion? I'm looking into the subject for my own interest and I do think certain major religions are cults (being honest and open) but I wanted a general definition that was accepted before I argued said opinion. After all, you can't argue someting is a cult if you don't have the same for a cult.
Post #3
Hello, Scarlet Rage, and welcome to the Debating Christianity & Religion forums!
As to your question, "Is there a general consensus as what separates a cult from a religion?" I'd suggest that the fundamental difference is perspective. I've noticed that it always seems to be the other person's belief system that's a cult, never our own.
Again, welcome to the DC&R forums; I look forward to your continued participation.
Regards,
mrmufin
Fair enough. Since there is a subforum dedicated to definitions and explanations, I took the liberty of moving your topic to the more appropriate location.Scarlet Rage wrote:I didn't know which forum to put this in, so I took a guess.
As to your question, "Is there a general consensus as what separates a cult from a religion?" I'd suggest that the fundamental difference is perspective. I've noticed that it always seems to be the other person's belief system that's a cult, never our own.
Again, welcome to the DC&R forums; I look forward to your continued participation.
Regards,
mrmufin
Re: Definition of a Cult
Post #7Just as a point(s) of information I wanted to offer an essay from the Baha'i perspective on the issue of cults and how to define them:Scarlet Rage wrote:I didn't know which forum to put this in, so I took a guess. If I am wrong, I'm sorry in advance. Is there a general consensus as what separates a cult from a religion? I'm looking into the subject for my own interest and I do think certain major religions are cults (being honest and open) but I wanted a general definition that was accepted before I argued said opinion. After all, you can't argue someting is a cult if you don't have the same for a cult.
http://bahai-library.com/essays/cult.html
The essay identifies the following as characteristics of cults:
1.) a charismatic leader demanding total authority,
2.) the use of "controlling" techniques,
3.) social and physical isolation,
4.) extreme or fanatical behavior,
5.) secrecy and deception.
- Art
- Dilettante
- Sage
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Spain
Post #8
Drawing a clear-cut line between cults and religions is a tricky business. In principle, any small splinter religious group could be called a cult. And many mainstream religions were initially seen as cults. Perhaps more important than the difference between a religion and a cult is the difference between a harmless cult/religion and a harmful one.
Some of the danger signs are:
1. The leaders promote a manichean, "us vs. them" mentality.
2. The group is preoccupied with making money.
3. The group is preoccupied with recruiting people rather than persuading.
4. Group members are encouraged or required to socialize with other group members only.
5. Guilt feelings are systematically induced on members as a mind control technique.
6. Any questioning, doubt or dissent is strongly discouraged and/or punished.
7. The leaders dictate (in detail) how members should dress, speak, behave or feel.
8. The leaders tell members exactly what to think about most issues.
9. Repetitive chanting, meditation, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions and intensive work routines are imposed on members to numb their minds.
10. Members are expected to spend an unreasonable amount of time doing work for the group, in detriment of family time.
11. Members are told that certain unethical acts are permissible if done for the good of the group (e.g., "lying for God").
The better a certain religious group fits the above criteria, the higher the chances of its being a harmful one.
Some of the danger signs are:
1. The leaders promote a manichean, "us vs. them" mentality.
2. The group is preoccupied with making money.
3. The group is preoccupied with recruiting people rather than persuading.
4. Group members are encouraged or required to socialize with other group members only.
5. Guilt feelings are systematically induced on members as a mind control technique.
6. Any questioning, doubt or dissent is strongly discouraged and/or punished.
7. The leaders dictate (in detail) how members should dress, speak, behave or feel.
8. The leaders tell members exactly what to think about most issues.
9. Repetitive chanting, meditation, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions and intensive work routines are imposed on members to numb their minds.
10. Members are expected to spend an unreasonable amount of time doing work for the group, in detriment of family time.
11. Members are told that certain unethical acts are permissible if done for the good of the group (e.g., "lying for God").
The better a certain religious group fits the above criteria, the higher the chances of its being a harmful one.
Post #9
I think i agree with your definition pretty much "Dilettante" ...
I think though, we can run a risk of infringing on peoples' civil liberties and freedom of worship when we define as "cult" behaviours such as
"Repetitive chanting, meditation, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions and intensive work routines are imposed on members to numb their minds."
You make an assumption here that the purpose is to numb the minds when meditation could sharpen the mind if you understand what i'm saying. Meditation also can be a solitary activity as cahnting could be....
The use of term "cult" is negative enough for many people and i doubt they think much about a definition when they use the word.
- Art
I think though, we can run a risk of infringing on peoples' civil liberties and freedom of worship when we define as "cult" behaviours such as
"Repetitive chanting, meditation, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions and intensive work routines are imposed on members to numb their minds."
You make an assumption here that the purpose is to numb the minds when meditation could sharpen the mind if you understand what i'm saying. Meditation also can be a solitary activity as cahnting could be....
The use of term "cult" is negative enough for many people and i doubt they think much about a definition when they use the word.
- Art
- Dilettante
- Sage
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Spain
Post #10
You're right, Arthra: meditation is not necessarily mind-numbing. Meditation also means "thinking carefully about something for a long time", and philosophers do just that, not to numb their minds but to sharpen them, as you said. It can also mean "remaining silent and calm for a while" and many religious people do that too, and I suppose it can be very relaxing. Some types of meditation, however, especially if accompanied by hypnotic recitation, can get your mind on "automatic mode". I don't know if this has any benefits, but it sounds pretty mind-numbing to me.
So let me rephrase my definition: "Repetitive chanting, meditation [...] when imposed on members to numb their minds."
Same goes for chanting. There are many types of chanting and I wasn't thinking of all of them. Hey, I enjoy listening to Gregorian chanting for example:
Puer natus est nobis....
So, yes, I should have been more specific.
However, I don't see how I was running a risk of curtailing anyone's civil liberties, since I did not advocate banning cults--as long as they are not routinely engaged in dangerous criminal activities which imperil other people.
Regards,
Dilettante
So let me rephrase my definition: "Repetitive chanting, meditation [...] when imposed on members to numb their minds."
Same goes for chanting. There are many types of chanting and I wasn't thinking of all of them. Hey, I enjoy listening to Gregorian chanting for example:
Puer natus est nobis....
So, yes, I should have been more specific.
However, I don't see how I was running a risk of curtailing anyone's civil liberties, since I did not advocate banning cults--as long as they are not routinely engaged in dangerous criminal activities which imperil other people.
Regards,
Dilettante