The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

kingiyk
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 5:44 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #1

Post by kingiyk »

Take The Time to Review The Mathematical Proof of The One True God: The Holy Trinity.

Within this text is The Proof, beyond an ounce of doubt, by way of the language of the Universe: Mathematics, that The Triune God is The One True God and The Holy Bible is His Word.

https://trinitythetruth.github.io/ << Review Proof

benchwarmer
Prodigy
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2337 times
Been thanked: 960 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #41

Post by benchwarmer »

SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:02 pm
servant1 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:42 am Maybe you missed the facts of reality=
1) Israel never served a trinity while serving the true God
Syllogism test...

1. Old testament Israel never had a system of baptism, as part of their holy sacraments.

2. Therefore, Christians shouldn't baptize as part of any holy sacrament.
First, that is not a valid syllogism. Your (1) is a premise. Fine. Your (2) is a "therefore" which makes no sense. You need at least 2 statements tied together by something before you can call it a syllogism.

Fixed:

1. Old testament Israel never had a system of baptism, as part of their holy sacraments.
2. Christians emerged out of Old testament Israel.
3. Therefore, Christians never had a system of baptism when they emerged out of Old testament Israel.

Now the syllogism is 'valid' logically, but the first premise is false so it's no use.

The Jewish Roots of Baptism
https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-base ... ly-jewish/

You also realize that Jesus was a Jew right? So when he was baptized it was a Jew baptizing a Jew.

Now that we've sorted that out, back to this pointless OP about math proving anything to do with gods and the current tangent debate whether the trinity is even Biblical. Have fun.

User avatar
SiNcE_1985
Under Probation
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:32 pm
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #42

Post by SiNcE_1985 »

benchwarmer wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:42 pm First, that is not a valid syllogism. Your (1) is a premise. Fine. Your (2) is a "therefore" which makes no sense. You need at least 2 statements tied together by something before you can call it a syllogism.

Fixed:

1. Old testament Israel never had a system of baptism, as part of their holy sacraments.
2. Christians emerged out of Old testament Israel.
3. Therefore, Christians never had a system of baptism when they emerged out of Old testament Israel.
Correct. But you got my point :D.
Now the syllogism is 'valid' logically, but the first premise is false so it's no use.

The Jewish Roots of Baptism
https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-base ... ly-jewish/
Um, no.

If it wasn't called "baptism", then it wasn't baptism. The ritual bathing of the OT was just for the priests, while the system of baptism in the new testament was good for every new Christian convert.

I can care less about "roots", my only point was, baptism as Jesus implemented in the NT is not found in the OT.
You also realize that Jesus was a Jew right? So when he was baptized it was a Jew baptizing a Jew.
Yeah and last I checked, the story of Jesus' baptism is found in the New Testament, not the Old Testament.

Which, as I said, is/was a New Testament thing under the new system.
Now that we've sorted that out, back to this pointless OP about math proving anything to do with gods and the current tangent debate whether the trinity is even Biblical. Have fun.
Yeah, anything having to do with gods, is pointless to an unbeliever.

We know that.
I got 99 problems, dude.

Don't become the hundredth one.

servant1
Apprentice
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:25 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #43

Post by servant1 »

[Replying to SiNcE_1985 in post #40]


Catholicisms own encyclopedia says--The Apostolic Fathers knew nothing of God being a trinity. They were there and have recorded history proof. Satan has many deceptions going out all through this world. He beat 99% living now centuries ago.

User avatar
SiNcE_1985
Under Probation
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:32 pm
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #44

Post by SiNcE_1985 »

servant1 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:20 pm [Replying to SiNcE_1985 in post #40]
Catholicisms own encyclopedia says--The Apostolic Fathers knew nothing of God being a trinity. They were there and have recorded history proof.
First all, belief in the Trinity is not based upon what the Apostolic Fathers thought or taught...it is based on what the Bible says.

Second, I just read the three of the Apostolic Fathers (that I previously mentioned) works as it pertains to this subject, and they all, at some point, called both Jesus and the Holy Spirit, God.

Third, do your own research and draw your own conclusions.
Satan has many deceptions going out all through this world.
Preaching to the choir.
I got 99 problems, dude.

Don't become the hundredth one.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12735
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #45

Post by 1213 »

SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:33 pm ...
If Jesus became subjected to the Father, then what was he before he became subjected to the Father?
The same as everything else that was not yet subjected?
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

marke
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1079
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #46

Post by marke »

1213 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:39 am
SiNcE_1985 wrote: Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:44 pm ...
Now my question is, what was Jesus before he became subjected to the Father?
It says: "he is excepted who subjected all things to him", which means, there is one exemption. God is the one who puts in subjection and obviously then He is the exception, because without Him it would not be possible.
Yes, Jesus will at the very end put Himself under subjection to God, implying He was not under subjection like that before.

benchwarmer
Prodigy
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2337 times
Been thanked: 960 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #47

Post by benchwarmer »

SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:00 pm
Now the syllogism is 'valid' logically, but the first premise is false so it's no use.

The Jewish Roots of Baptism
https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-base ... ly-jewish/
Um, no.

If it wasn't called "baptism", then it wasn't baptism. The ritual bathing of the OT was just for the priests, while the system of baptism in the new testament was good for every new Christian convert.
Ok, cool. So you are now asserting that Jesus wasn't baptized by John? You realize where that's going to lead right?
SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:00 pm I can care less about "roots", my only point was, baptism as Jesus implemented in the NT is not found in the OT.
Jesus didn't implement it, John did (well in the NT documents anyways). This is the point. John was already baptizing people based on ... you guessed it ... the OT (or more correctly the 'scriptures' at the time which are now part of the OT).
SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:00 pm
You also realize that Jesus was a Jew right? So when he was baptized it was a Jew baptizing a Jew.
Yeah and last I checked, the story of Jesus' baptism is found in the New Testament, not the Old Testament.
At when Jesus was being baptized, was there a copy of the NT sitting over on a rock or something?

The point you seem to be missing is that the NT didn't exist when Jesus was getting baptized by John. I would think this is obvious. I would also think it's obvious that this baptism was done based on existing traditions which could only have been found in the existing scriptures.

Look, if you want to die on this hill, have at it. I'm just pointing out the obvious flaws in your syllogism. Carry on.
SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:00 pm Which, as I said, is/was a New Testament thing under the new system.
The system wasn't new, John was doing it already.....

User avatar
SiNcE_1985
Under Probation
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:32 pm
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #48

Post by SiNcE_1985 »

1213 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:30 am
SiNcE_1985 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:33 pm ...
If Jesus became subjected to the Father, then what was he before he became subjected to the Father?
The same as everything else that was not yet subjected?
Wrong.

Jesus was equal with God (Phil 2:5-9).

Jesus was not some created, inferior being to Yahweh. He was of the same essence and they shared the same sovereignty and glory.

Jesus willfully made himself nothing, and took the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of man...for the redemption of mankind.
I got 99 problems, dude.

Don't become the hundredth one.

User avatar
SiNcE_1985
Under Probation
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:32 pm
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #49

Post by SiNcE_1985 »

benchwarmer wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 7:32 am Ok, cool. So you are now asserting that Jesus wasn't baptized by John? You realize where that's going to lead right?
Um, no. Nothing I said comes anywhere remotely close to insinuating that Jesus was not baptized by John.

I made my point very clear, which is that you are conflating the ritual bathing of the priests from the OT, as a parallel to actual baptism of the NT.

This point is obvious, as John wasn't out there baptizing priests, and the priests of the old testament washed themselves, contrary to baptism, where it is a dual-ritual.
Jesus didn't implement it, John did (well in the NT documents anyways). This is the point. John was already baptizing people based on ... you guessed it ... the OT (or more correctly the 'scriptures' at the time which are now part of the OT).
John would not have been baptizing anyone without the authority of Jesus Christ...and John himself said that Jesus is greater than him, and that he is not even worthy to untie Jesus' sandals.

Again, my point is, John' baptism was unique..and scripture does not tell us when he was given the command and "know how" to baptize the way that he did, but it is clear that this was a new way of bringing people to repentance.

Otherwise, you can enlighten on where, in the old testament, Jews were commanded to be submerged in water during their repentance ritual.
At when Jesus was being baptized, was there a copy of the NT sitting over on a rock or something?
Would the Son of Man, God incarnate, need to appeal to anyone besides his own divine word and will?

No. Jesus IS the NT, so he wouldn't need a copy of the NT to do what he do...he is the WORD.
The point you seem to be missing is that the NT didn't exist when Jesus was getting baptized by John. I would think this is obvious. I would also think it's obvious that this baptism was done based on existing traditions which could only have been found in the existing scriptures.Look, if you want to die on this hill, have at it. I'm just pointing out the obvious flaws in your syllogism. Carry on.
Um, you are still missing the point..I said that baptism, as demonstrated throughout the NT, is a New Testament thing.

That's why you can't find the words "baptize/baptism", nor the practice of baptism, ANYWHERE in the Old Testament.

These are all facts that are not meant to be argued, unless someone doesn't know what they think they know.
The system wasn't new, John was doing it already.....
And who was doing it before John, Biblically speaking?
I got 99 problems, dude.

Don't become the hundredth one.

kingiyk
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 5:44 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof God, The Holy Trinity.

Post #50

Post by kingiyk »

Definition of Concepts:

The Holy Trinity:
A single God existing as three identical entities. In the concept of The Trinity, Three and One are the same.

Trinity of Numbers:
A single number existing as three identical entities.

Digital Root:
The single digit and ultimate unit number derived by the iterative process of summing the individual digits of a number.

ILLUSTRATIONS

2023 » 2 + 0 + 2 + 3 = 7
30 » 3 + 0 = 3
1191993 » 1+1+9+1+9+9+3 = 33 » 3 + 3 = 6

The Proof is comprised of 7 segments:

1.) The Magnificence of 3,6,9: The Trinity of Numbers: Proves The Holy Trinity to be True by way of Mathematics

2.) Time & Space: Proves The Triune God to be The creator of Time, Space, and The Universe

3.) The Word: Proves The Bible to be The Word of God

4 & 5.) The Image and The Earth: Proves The Triune God is The Creator of Man and all living creatures

6.) Order & Peace: Proves the orderly nature of The Triune God as revealed in The scriptures.

7.) The First & The Last: Proves The Triune God is who He says He is.

All segments answer the questions Man has pondered upon, especially on origin and purpose.

The Proof begins by deriving the Holy Trinity (3 3 3) through the Trinity of Numbers then proceeds to illustrate how The Holy Trinity (3 3 3) proves consistent in all 7 segments.

1.) The Magnificence of 3,6,9: The Trinity of Numbers:

The Digital Root of any Trinity of Numbers united into an integer is either 3, 6 , or 9.

111 » 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
222 » 2 + 2 + 2 = 6
333 » 3 + 3 + 3 = 9

444 » 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 » 1 + 2 = 3
555 » 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 » 1 + 5 = 6
666 » 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 » 1 + 8 = 9

777 » 7 + 7 + 7 = 21 » 2 + 1 = 3
888 » 8 + 8 + 8 = 24 » 2 + 4 =6
999 » 9 + 9 + 9 = 27 » 2 + 7 = 9

The recurring sequence 3 6 9 is magnificent for its representation of
The Truth: THE HOLY TRINITY !!! 3 3 3

3, 6, and 9 are part of the sequence of numbers obtained by adding 3 repeatedly

3 + 3 (6) + 3 (9) | 3 3 3 (See Proof for full illustration)

The Holy Trinity is assigned the numerical value
3 3 3 and Satan is self-assigned 6 6 6.[Revelation 13:18]
When you incorporate Isaiah 14:14 [which states: "I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High"] into this wonder, the reason for Satan's choice of 6 6 6 becomes overly glaring: He aims to be like God.

Romans 5:6: "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly."

When The Cross is fixed into a Time Clock, the co-ordinates are 3 6 9 and 12. The Cross is comprised of three entities:
3, 6, 9 - each representing an entity of the Trinity respectively, and a single head that unifies all three (The GodHead\God = 12; 1 Corinthians 11:3).

God is an ULTIMATE UNIT existing in eternity as Three distinct Entities in The Name of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit.

When all three entities are united to become an ULTIMATE UNIT(a single digit) by deriving the digital root of the sum and the digital root of the unifying Godhead\God is derived, the result is:

The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit =
3 + 6 + 9 = 18 » 1 + 8 = 9

God = 12 » 1 + 2 = 3

The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit = 9;
God = 3

The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 9

9 is comprised of three 3s. 9 ≡ 3 3 3 i.e. a single God existing as three identical entities.

9 represents the three members of the trinity and 3 represents God. It means there are three individuals who are God in 9-The Trinity.

3 3 3; each 3 representing an entity of The Trinity:
God The Father, God The Son, God The Holy Spirit


2.) TIME & SPACE

The Earth is the Third of Nine Planets.

The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 9.

9 is comprised of three 3s: 3 3 3


3.) THE WORD

The Bible is comprised of The New Testament and The Old Testament. The Old Testament is comprised of 39 books while The New Testament is comprised of 27 books.


The New Testament : 27 (3 3 3)
The Old Testament : 39 (3 and 9; 9 is comprised of three 3s; 333)


4&5:) THE IMAGE

Man was created in the image of God- A Trinity.

When The Cross is fixed into a Time Clock, Man is depicted as having three distinct parts 1, 2, 3 ; reach represented by 3, 6, 9 respectively (see proof for full illustration)

1 and 3 are the same (both hands)-a representation of The Holy Trinity.

1 and 3 are also represented by 3 and 9 in the Time Clock; 9 is comprised of three 3s: 3 3 3 (See Proof for full illustration)


6.) ORDER & PEACE [1 Corinthians 14:33]

The Triune Number 9 acts as a guardian of order in the digital root system, providing structure, predictability, and balance.

When a number is multiplied by 9, the digital root of the product will be 9.

9 x 20 = 180; 1 + 8 + 0 = 9;
9 x 30 = 270; 2 + 7 + 0 = 9;
9 x 40 = 360; 3 + 6 + 0 = 9;

9 is comprised of three 3s; 3 3 3


7.) THE FIRST & THE LAST [Revelation 22:13]

Man was designed to use the Base 10 Numeral System.

Consisting of 10 digits:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

1 is The First or The Beginning Number and The Triune Number 9 is The Highest or The Last.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [3 3 3]

⇛God is The First and He is The Last.
⇛He is The Beginning and He is The End.
⇛He is One and He is a Trinity.

There are 27 letters in the alphabets.
A [1]

B C D E F G H I J K
L M N O P Q R
S T U V W
X Y Z

&[27] (3 3 3)

⇛God is The Alpha & The Omega.
⇛He is The Beginning & The End.
⇛He is One and He is a Trinity.

Put mind to task and examine the evidence. When done, you will be left with two choices: Proclaim this Proof to be The Truth or declare me The Greatest Mathematician The World has ever seen.

Checkmate!!!

Post Reply