Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #1

Post by Skeptical »

Doing some research for The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve thread, I came across this article:

https://www.gotquestions.org/talking-snake.html

which says:
Still, why didn’t Adam and Eve find it strange that an animal was speaking to them? It is unlikely that Adam and Eve had the same perspective we do on animals. In our era, we know from experience that animals are incapable of speech on the same level as humans. Adam and Eve did not have a childhood, nor did they have other humans to learn from. Given that Adam and Eve had probably only been alive a matter of days, it is not unreasonable for them to believe that animals were capable of speech. It is also possible that this was not the first talking animal Adam and Eve had encountered. Perhaps Satan or even God Himself had used animals to communicate with Adam and Eve before. There are so few details given in the account that much is left to speculation and presumption.


Huh? 🤔

Therefore, I would like to know if there are any other Christians besides the one's from Got Questions who think that it's a possibility that animals used to talk a long time ago back in the Garden of Eden.

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #41

Post by Skeptical »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 3:39 am
Skeptical wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 12:06 am Why would God allow such a horrible thing to happen in his Garden of Eden?
The tree was a test. What would be the point of devising a test and not allowing anyone to fail it?
What I'm about to ask may be a bit off topic and I may start a separate thread about it, but why did God even need to test Adam and Eve?
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 3:39 amThe SEPENT (Satan) temptation was not part of God's purpose but it was something that God allowed to see if his children were loyal to Him. Sadly Adam and Eve proved to be disloyal but they had the right to make such a choice.


JW
But how could it had not been part of God's purpose when the whole story fits together like an assembled jigsaw puzzle?

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #42

Post by Skeptical »

tam wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 12:31 pm Peace to you,
Skeptical wrote: Sun May 14, 2023 10:23 pm Doing some research for The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve thread, I came across this article:

https://www.gotquestions.org/talking-snake.html

which says:
Still, why didn’t Adam and Eve find it strange that an animal was speaking to them? It is unlikely that Adam and Eve had the same perspective we do on animals. In our era, we know from experience that animals are incapable of speech on the same level as humans. Adam and Eve did not have a childhood, nor did they have other humans to learn from. Given that Adam and Eve had probably only been alive a matter of days, it is not unreasonable for them to believe that animals were capable of speech. It is also possible that this was not the first talking animal Adam and Eve had encountered. Perhaps Satan or even God Himself had used animals to communicate with Adam and Eve before. There are so few details given in the account that much is left to speculation and presumption.


Huh? 🤔

Therefore, I would like to know if there are any other Christians besides the one's from Got Questions who think that it's a possibility that animals used to talk a long time ago back in the Garden of Eden.
I cannot speak for anyone else, but it was not a talking snake. It was the Adversary himself (a seraph, what most people refer to as simply an angel). That drakon, that ancient SERPENT (Rev 20:2).

The word dragon derives from the Greek δράκων (drakōn) and its Latin cognate draco. Ancient Greeks applied the term to large, constricting snakes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragons_i ... _mythology
In Greece the word drakōn, from which the English word was derived, was used originally for any large serpent (see sea serpent), and the dragon of mythology, whatever shape it later assumed, remained essentially a snake.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/dragon ... l-creature


It was not a talking snake. It was a seraph: a flying fiery serpent.
In Hebrew, the word saraph means "burning", and is used seven times throughout the text of the Hebrew Bible as a noun, usually to denote "serpent",[5] twice in the Book of Numbers, once in the Book of Deuteronomy, and four times in the Book of Isaiah.[6][7][8] The reason why the word for "burning" was also used to denote a serpent is not universally agreed upon; it may be due to a certain snake's fiery colors, or perhaps the burning sensation left by its venomous bite. Regardless, its plural form, seraphim, occurs in both Numbers and Isaiah, but only in Isaiah is it used to denote an angelic being; likewise, these angels are referred to only as the plural seraphim – Isaiah later uses the singular saraph to describe a "fiery flying serpent", in line with the other uses of the term throughout the Tanakh.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seraph


Peace again to you.
This is interesting information, but what about the Hebrew word נָחָשׁ (Nāḥāš)? Because from what I looked up, the Hebrew word in Genesis 1:1 is not the same Hebrew word that you referred to for saraph.
Eden

The Hebrew word נָחָשׁ (Nāḥāš) is used in the Hebrew Bible to identify the serpent that appears in Genesis 3:1, in the Garden of Eden. In the first book of the Torah, the serpent is portrayed as a deceptive creature or trickster,[1] who promotes as good what God had forbidden and shows particular cunning in its deception. (cf. Genesis 3:4–5 and 3:22) The serpent has the ability to speak and to reason: "Now the serpent was more subtle (also translated as "cunning") than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made".[22] There is no indication in the Book of Genesis that the serpent was a deity in its own right. . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpents_ ... deception.

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #43

Post by Skeptical »

William wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 2:10 pm
One thing is clear though. The emphasis is on resemblance re biology. It was Adams job to be the biologist and I am sure he knew a dumb snake from a talking lizard, if I am following the story correctly.
I am not prepared to assume Eve was stupid in that regard either.
Neither am I. Therefore, I agree with William's assessment in the quote above. However, the story itself and the general interpretation of the story makes it sound as if Eve was either stupid or some sort of gullible, selfish, unthankful villainess. And in my opinion, the logic of it all smacks of scapegoatism.

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #44

Post by Skeptical »

tam wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 6:31 pm Peace to you,

A seraph is an angel. The Adversary is an angel. Angels can fly (flying). Angels are fiery (in appearance, think about the angel that spoke to Moses from the bush that appeared to be burning, but was not). The Adversary is specifically referred to as a drakon, that ancient serpent.


Peace again to you.
So, tam, according to your logic, would that mean that angels are also snakes/serpents?

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #45

Post by Skeptical »

tam wrote: Wed May 17, 2023 12:28 pm Peace to you,


Then the being speaking to Eve in the Garden of Eden is no mere snake, but rather the Adversary (the one called Satan).




Peace again to you.
But I still don't see your connection where the scriptures are saying that the serpent in Genesis 3:1 IS also a seraph, other than through your own conjecture.

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #46

Post by Skeptical »

Revelations won wrote: Wed May 17, 2023 9:51 pm Dear Skeptical and other respondents,

I think the clear answer to the OP question is very obvious today. For example there are many Parrots that talk and the same is true of Parakeets. There are possibly other animals or birds that also talk as well but I have no personal experience with those other creatures.

Kind regards,
RW
The "clear" and "obvious" answer? Parrots and Parakeets talk, but there are "possibly other animals or birds that also talk as well"? Um, yep. Clear as mud. 😬

Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #47

Post by Skeptical »

William wrote: Thu May 18, 2023 2:58 pm
tam wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 4:16 pm [Replying to William in post #24]

I'm not sure what your point is, William (peace to you.)
Peace and Love Tam.

If I am reading you correctly, we agree that the Serpent in the Garden Story, was not an actual Snake re its appearance.
Its appearance can be deduced by the little that is told of it. It could walk and talk, which we know snakes cannot do.
The story tells it that Father YHVH took away those abilities the Serpent had, transforming it into what we and our dictionaries call "snakes" and the reason is clear why folk think the description of its transformed state, best fits with that of a snake.

Further to that, the Hebrew and Greek words appear to be fairly similar and point to the prefix "Reptile/Reptilian" as in - what Family of specie the Serpent belonged in.

The Dragon also belongs in the Reptilian Family, but fire-breathing ones come from Supernaturalism.

Now if we are to consider the story a work of fiction, then sure - why not consider the Serpent looked like a Dragon.

But if we consider the story a work of fact, then we have to eliminate supernaturalism and focus on fitting said story in what we know about the nature of nature.

There are no fossil records of any fire breathing dragons, although there are many records of giant Reptilians which once roamed the Earth, which adequately fit the description of being "Dragons", if not the type imagined from the Halls of Supernaturalism - then certainly - close cousins.
There are also actual Dragons which exist on the planet right now. They are what I would call "The Dragons of The Reptilian Family." and one in particular does snap at the heals of humans and if it catches a human it can do significant damage which results in the Dragon eating the human.
There are no known Dragons which talk, so the Garden Serpent may have been of the Dragon aspect of the Reptilian Family, but had the added aspect of being intelligent like a Human. able to use the complexity of language like a Human and - like a Human - was likely top of the order in relation the The Reptilian Family.

Therefore we can ascertain that the Serpent probably walked upright on two legs and used the other two appendages as arms and hands, like the Human.
We can come to such conclusions by observing the nature of Nature.

Whoever wrote Revelation certainly went on a trip. but we don't really know if what he experienced were real things or imagined things so cannot say for sure that the story isn't a work of fiction from our perspective, even that it may have been an actual real experience from the writer's perspective. Certainly we should be able to agree that the language used is very symbolic.

Yet the connection between the Garden Serpent and The Fire-Dragon of Revelation, distorts itself with a supernatural overlay of images of creatures which do not exist on this planet. Where they did exist, was in the Greco-Roman mythology from which Christianity emerged.

It is noted that a Dragon appears in Hebrew mythology, as far as my internet search goes...but we would be hard-pressed to accept that this creature was the same one as the Serpent. Of the Family, perhaps...but specifically a sea-dwelling Dragon.
a search result wrote:In the Hebrew Bible Leviathan, a serpentine sea creature. Yahweh created Leviathan to play in the sea (Psalms 104:26) and defeated the monster as a demonstration of his power (Psalms 74:14; Isa 27:1).
a search result wrote:Leviathan's fire-breathing ability, his impenetrable scales, and his overall indomitability in Job 41
Psalms 104:26 “There go the ships: there is that leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein.”

Psalms 74:14 Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, and gavest him to be meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.

Isa 27:1 In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.

Job 41:19...Out of his mouth go burning lamps, and sparks of fire leap out.

Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out of a seething pot or caldron.

His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth.

Clearly the nature of all those writings are mythological, presenting Father YHVH in a supernatural manner, dealing to supernatural critters while implying said creatures exist on the Earth.

The authors are clearly infatuated with the supernatural YHVH that they created in their imaginations, and expanded upon in their telling the story of it.

Therefore, it is easy enough for the seeker of Truth, to understand that the Greco-Roman mythology from which Christianity emerged, was easily superimposed upon the earlier Hebrew Mythology.

Back to the OP question, it is easy enough to understand that if the human animal form can talk using complex language systems to do so, there is no reason for us to think it would not have been possible that a creature from the Reptilian Family could also talk.

But it is highly unlikely that the Serpent was a Dragon/leviathan in appearance, and there is also no mention of the leviathan having the power of speech.

Thus, even that the connection is made by the Greco-Roman Christian mythology of Revelation, that the two are - of form - one and the same, they are not.

To summarize.
• The appearance of the serpent in the Garden of Eden story is not that of an actual snake but can be deduced from the limited information given.
• The serpent's abilities to walk and talk suggest a form different from that of a snake.
• The Hebrew and Greek words used for the serpent imply a connection to the reptilian family.
• While there are no fossil records of fire-breathing dragons, there are records of giant reptilian creatures that fit the description of dragons as close relatives.
• Actual dragons exist on the planet today, but they do not possess the ability to talk.
• The story of the serpent should be considered within a naturalistic framework rather than relying on supernatural interpretations.
• The connection between the serpent and the fire-dragon of Revelation is distorted by a supernatural overlay of creatures that do not exist on Earth.
• Hebrew mythology mentions Leviathan, a serpentine sea creature, but it is distinct from the serpent in the Garden of Eden story and does not possess the power of speech.
• Greco-Roman mythology influenced early Christianity and may have superimposed supernatural elements onto earlier Hebrew mythology.
• The appearance and characteristics of the serpent are not that of a dragon/leviathan, and there is no mention of the leviathan having the power of speech.

Peace in The Truth.
Excellent post that I still gave a "thanks" to, but with the exception of this part by William:
Back to the OP question, it is easy enough to understand that if the human animal form can talk using complex language systems to do so, there is no reason for us to think it would not have been possible that a creature from the Reptilian Family could also talk.
Because of information such as this:
The Broca’s area in the cerebrum of our brain is closely associated with speech comprehension. This part of the brain is less developed, or absent, in other animals. Therefore, it is said to confer upon us the ability to talk. There is also the presence of certain pathways found only in some animals, humans among them.

https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/w ... ng%20them.
And this 8-year-old 1 minute and 46 second video:



However, this more recent 3-year-old 2 minute and 51 second video shows a bit more updated information:


Skeptical
Apprentice
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #48

Post by Skeptical »

William wrote: Thu May 18, 2023 2:58 pm
Yet the connection between the Garden Serpent and The Fire-Dragon of Revelation, distorts itself with a supernatural overlay of images of creatures which do not exist on this planet. Where they did exist, was in the Greco-Roman mythology from which Christianity emerged.

It is noted that a Dragon appears in Hebrew mythology, as far as my internet search goes...but we would be hard-pressed to accept that this creature was the same one as the Serpent. Of the Family, perhaps...but specifically a sea-dwelling Dragon.
a search result wrote:In the Hebrew Bible Leviathan, a serpentine sea creature. Yahweh created Leviathan to play in the sea (Psalms 104:26) and defeated the monster as a demonstration of his power (Psalms 74:14; Isa 27:1).
a search result wrote:Leviathan's fire-breathing ability, his impenetrable scales, and his overall indomitability in Job 41
Psalms 104:26 “There go the ships: there is that leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein.”

Psalms 74:14 Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, and gavest him to be meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.

Isa 27:1 In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.

Job 41:19...Out of his mouth go burning lamps, and sparks of fire leap out.

Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out of a seething pot or caldron.

His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth.

Clearly the nature of all those writings are mythological, presenting Father YHVH in a supernatural manner, dealing to supernatural critters while implying said creatures exist on the Earth.

The authors are clearly infatuated with the supernatural YHVH that they created in their imaginations, and expanded upon in their telling the story of it.

Therefore, it is easy enough for the seeker of Truth, to understand that the Greco-Roman mythology from which Christianity emerged, was easily superimposed upon the earlier Hebrew Mythology.

Back to the OP question, it is easy enough to understand that if the human animal form can talk using complex language systems to do so, there is no reason for us to think it would not have been possible that a creature from the Reptilian Family could also talk.

But it is highly unlikely that the Serpent was a Dragon/leviathan in appearance, and there is also no mention of the leviathan having the power of speech.

Thus, even that the connection is made by the Greco-Roman Christian mythology of Revelation, that the two are - of form - one and the same, they are not.

To summarize.
• The appearance of the serpent in the Garden of Eden story is not that of an actual snake but can be deduced from the limited information given.
• The serpent's abilities to walk and talk suggest a form different from that of a snake.
• The Hebrew and Greek words used for the serpent imply a connection to the reptilian family.
• While there are no fossil records of fire-breathing dragons, there are records of giant reptilian creatures that fit the description of dragons as close relatives.
• Actual dragons exist on the planet today, but they do not possess the ability to talk.
• The story of the serpent should be considered within a naturalistic framework rather than relying on supernatural interpretations.
• The connection between the serpent and the fire-dragon of Revelation is distorted by a supernatural overlay of creatures that do not exist on Earth.
• Hebrew mythology mentions Leviathan, a serpentine sea creature, but it is distinct from the serpent in the Garden of Eden story and does not possess the power of speech.
• Greco-Roman mythology influenced early Christianity and may have superimposed supernatural elements onto earlier Hebrew mythology.
• The appearance and characteristics of the serpent are not that of a dragon/leviathan, and there is no mention of the leviathan having the power of speech.

Peace in The Truth.
Not to alarm or to offend anyone, but in doing some research on what William had mentioned, I found this:
“In Egypt the mother goddess Isis is pursued by the red dragon Set or Typhon and flees to an island, where she gives birth to the sun god, Horus. In Ugaritic myth the storm god Baal defeats the seven-headed serpent Leviathan and sets up his kingdom. IN Mesopotamia, Marduk, the god of light, kills the seven-headed dragon Tiamat, who had thrown down a third of the stars. In Greco-Roman myth, the goddess Leto, pregnant with Apollo, is pursued by the dragon Python. She is rescued by Poseidon, who places her in safety on an island. After Apollo is born, he slays Python.” (Pg. 454).

Out of these, the Leto/Apollo myth is the closest to what John has written here. So why does this vision seem to be taken from pagan myths? Osborne*** (Pgs. 454-455) concludes that this would have given the pagans, who longed for their myths to be true, someone who would fulfill what had been myths to them. Jesus would have “actualized” these myths “in history”. We have seen in other parts of Revelation where pagan myths and area history were used as background, especially in the seven messages to the seven churches in Asia Minor (Chapters 2 and 3).

http://biblicalgreeknuggets.blogspot.co ... study.html
Now, I'm not asking anyone to believe what was stated above, but I did find it interesting, and it certainly supported what William had stated.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 21252
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 806 times
Been thanked: 1138 times
Contact:

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #49

Post by JehovahsWitness »

Skeptical wrote: Sun May 28, 2023 10:04 pm... why did God even need to test Adam and Eve?
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 3:39 amThe SEPENT (Satan) temptation was not part of God's purpose but it was something that God allowed to see if his children were loyal to Him. Sadly Adam and Eve proved to be disloyal but they had the right to make such a choice.


JW

I think I have already answered that question. Please re-read the part underlined and in red above.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 9192
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1254 times
Been thanked: 323 times

Re: Do Christians Believe That Animals Used to Talk

Post #50

Post by onewithhim »

Skeptical wrote: Sun May 28, 2023 10:04 pm
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 3:39 am
Skeptical wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 12:06 am Why would God allow such a horrible thing to happen in his Garden of Eden?
The tree was a test. What would be the point of devising a test and not allowing anyone to fail it?
What I'm about to ask may be a bit off topic and I may start a separate thread about it, but why did God even need to test Adam and Eve?
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 3:39 amThe SEPENT (Satan) temptation was not part of God's purpose but it was something that God allowed to see if his children were loyal to Him. Sadly Adam and Eve proved to be disloyal but they had the right to make such a choice.


JW
But how could it had not been part of God's purpose when the whole story fits together like an assembled jigsaw puzzle?
It all fits together the way I see it, also. It doesn't make sense for Jehovah to create humans and then not tell them what is beneficial to them and what is not. He undoubtedly showed them nothing but love. The tree that he said they were to avoid was there to, as Jehovah'sWitness wrote, allow Adam and Eve to show their loyalty to Jehovah. They had everything they could want, yet they wanted something that wasn't theirs, AND they showed that they did not love or even respect their heavenly Father. They wanted independence from Him. They actually chose death, which is hard to understand, but Satan also chose an end that he knew would come, as he developed a desire to have people and angels worship him (in various ways). Perfect persons can choose what is not good for them....it's a privilege that all intelligent people (and angels) were given, that is, to choose the path they want to walk on.

Post Reply