Evolutionism, the Odd Man Out.

hiramabbi2 · Post by **hiramabbi2** » Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:51 pm

Mankind changed from prehistoric to Human just AFTER Noah arrived on this Planet. Civilization was born just South of the Mountains of Ararat, exactly as God told us.

The reason there is No evidence of Human Civilization before Mesopotamia, is that Humanity was inherited from Noah, a direct descendant of the first Human, Adam. Noah's grandsons married the descendants of the sons of God (Prehistoric Man) and produced those with the intelligence necessary to WRITE their own History.

This event took place some 10,000 + - years ago, and History agrees with Scripture. Evolutionism is odd man out, and NO Evol has been able to show us ANY evidence of an Earlier Human Civilization, than that which is listed in Scripture.

God Bless

hiramabbi2 · Post by **hiramabbi2** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm

perfessor wrote:
hiramabbi2 wrote:Is it just a coincidence that the first City, on this Planet, was built by one of the Noah's descendants (not the prehistoric beings) after Millions of years without evolution?
No, not a coincidence, because I think that the myth (Noah) was invented. About the only point of "coincidence" is the proximity of Ararat to Mesopotamia. This is really not very compelling, given the limited geographic knowledge of the early Hebrews.

Dear "Professor",

Evols are so silly. They don't understand that God told us exactly How He made everything, and every true discovery of Science agrees with His Holy Word. So, like you, they falsely suppose that they know more than God, when, in fact, they are poor, miserable, and ignorant of the Spiritual Truth.

God Bless

jwu · Post by **jwu** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:33 pm

They don't understand that God told us exactly How He made everything, and every true discovery of Science agrees with His Holy Word.

{emphasis mine}
In other words, if it contradicts scripture, or rather with your interpretation of it, then it can't be true by definition.

jwu

hiramabbi2 · Post by **hiramabbi2** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:34 pm

Dear Readers,

Professor Evols teach our children that we evolved our Human Intelligence, along with our physical body. How do they know this? They know Nothing, because they cannot measure the intelligence of our prehistoric ancestors, and they can't find ANY physical evidence, of that which is Not seen, our Human intelligence.

After years of asking these speculators How and When we changed from prehistoric to Human, I'd interpret their none answers, as a "black hole" in the whole flawed Theory.

God Bless

jwu · Post by **jwu** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:40 pm

hiramabbi2 wrote: After years of asking these speculators How and When we changed from prehistoric to Human, I'd interpret their none answers, as a "black hole" in the whole flawed Theory.

Could you please define the difference between prehistoric homo sapiens sapiens and what you call humans? Without such a definition your question is meaningless.

jwu

hiramabbi2 · Post by **hiramabbi2** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:20 pm

jwu wrote:
hiramabbi2 wrote: After years of asking these speculators How and When we changed from prehistoric to Human, I'd interpret their none answers, as a "black hole" in the whole flawed Theory.

Could you please define the difference between prehistoric homo sapiens sapiens and what you call humans? Without such a definition your question is meaningless. jwu

Dear jwu,

Biblically speaking, Humans are the offsprings between the union of Man (Adam's generations) and his "kind" (prehistoric beings). The only difference between the two identical creatures is their intelligence.

Man (Adam) was especially made with exemptional talents and intelligence by our Lord God. He also acquired the knowledge of GOOD and evil and became like them (God) Genesis 3:22.

On the other hand, "his kind" or the prehistoric beings made from the waters were innocent and without much intelligence compared to Adam, until, they formed a union with man. The final result of these mixed marriages (offsprings) are what called today HUMANS.

NO Evolution was necessary except descent with modification, or MicroEvolution.

Again, if Noah had not left his world and came to this Planet 10K +- years ago, we would still be innocent "Apes" (scientists term), because, for 4.53 Billions of years, Evolution did NOT produce Humans. Human Intelligence must be inherited from another Human.

God Bless

perfessor · Post by **perfessor** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:43 pm

hiramabbi2 wrote:Again, if Noah had not left his world and came to this Planet 10K +- years ago, we would still be innocent "Apes" (scientists term), because Evolution does NOT produce Humans. Human Intelligence must be inherited from another Human.

Er - what world did Noah come from? How did he get here? And what is your basis for this - just curious.

YEC · Post by **YEC** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:43 pm

hiramabbi2...I noticed you didn't reply to verse from Genesis that destroys your theory.
Perhaps I missed where you did reply, if so could you point out that post?

YEC wrote:
hiramabbi2 wrote:Genesis 1:21 tells us that every living creature that moveth was created from the water on Day 5.
The folowing is day 6.
GEN 1:24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.

i don't understand why you would say every living creature that moveth was made on day 5.

hiramabbi2 · Post by **hiramabbi2** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:53 pm

Dear YEC,

I believe I did! In fact my first two posts refute your assumption. Perhaps, you should read them again, this time very slowly, after that, then, come back to me if your still having trouble understanding it.

But, let me forewarn you and tell you the truth, you can NOT use the Scripture to prove your flawed assumption against me, simply because, they are based on your distorted religious view and they are not supported by the Scripture. Sorry.

God Bless

ENIGMA · Post by **ENIGMA** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:57 pm

hiramabbi2 wrote:Dear YEC,

I believe I did! In fact my first two posts refute your assumption. Perhaps, you should read them again, this time very slowly, after that, then, come back to me if your still having trouble understanding it.

But, let me forewarn you and tell you the truth, you can NOT use the Scripture to prove your flawed assumption against me, simply because, they are based on your distorted religious view and they are not supported by the Scripture. Sorry.

God Bless

The Scripture is not supported by the Scripture?

Fascinating...

YEC · Post by **YEC** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:25 pm

hiramabbi2 wrote:Dear YEC,

I believe I did! In fact my first two posts refute your assumption. Perhaps, you should read them again, this time very slowly, after that, then, come back to me if your still having trouble understanding it.

But, let me forewarn you and tell you the truth, you can NOT use the Scripture to prove your flawed assumption against me, simply because, they are based on your distorted religious view and they are not supported by the Scripture. Sorry.

God Bless

So, you use scripture to claim eveything that moveth was created on day 5...then I use scripture to show you are wrong by biblically demonstrating that some animals were made from the land and not the sea...and then you claim I can't use scripture?

I'm the one forewarned?