The Quran and the Bible

Argue for and against religions and philosophies which are not Christian

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

The Quran and the Bible

Post #1

Post by cholland »

Sura 4:136 - O you who believe, you shall believe in GOD and His messenger, and the scripture He has revealed through His messenger, and the scripture He has revealed before that. Anyone who refuses to believe in GOD, and His angels, and His scriptures, and His messengers, and the Last Day, has indeed strayed far astray.

If the Quran advises Muslims to "believe...the scripture He has revealed before that", why don't they believe the Bible?

User avatar
micatala
Site Supporter
Posts: 8338
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:04 pm

Post #31

Post by micatala »

Moderator Intervention
Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
haha, you want me to show you verses, where its mention that people changed annd tempered the scripture sent by God? make another thread for bible, I will show you how many errors are there in bible . and wil show you with your own christian scholars and theologians.
Show us here, brother...in the original Arabic...

I will ask Apple Pie to avoid one-liners which are not productive. It is fine to ask questions, but you have a whole string of posts like this where you really are not making a substantive response.


In addition, while debaters may allude to the original language of sacred writings, this is an English language site and you cannot expect others to be willing to discuss the original languages.
" . . . the line separating good and evil passes, not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart . . . ." Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Apple Pie
Banned
Banned
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:51 pm

Post #32

Post by Apple Pie »

micatala wrote:
I will ask Apple Pie to avoid one-liners which are not productive. It is fine to ask questions, but you have a whole string of posts like this where you really are not making a substantive response.
Show us this whole "string of posts" in full context...


In addition, while debaters may allude to the original language of sacred writings, this is an English language site and you cannot expect others to be willing to discuss the original languages.
Where have the debaters "alluded" to the original languages?

Apple Pie
Banned
Banned
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:51 pm

Post #33

Post by Apple Pie »

TrueReligion wrote:
Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote: Told you, no comments will be provided to you, unless you learn the mannners and ethics of debate.
Is the Arabic clear?
Arabic of Quran is crystal clear, what meaning you are deriving, is not clear and not correct:)
If the Arabic was clear, then there would not be a need for so many separate and different "authorized" renderings.

User avatar
Jester
Prodigy
Posts: 4214
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post #34

Post by Jester »

Moderator Comment
Apple Pie wrote:Show us this whole "string of posts" in full context...
Apple Pie wrote:Where have the debaters "alluded" to the original languages?
Public response to moderator correction is not allowed under the rules. If you have questions, send a private message.
Repeated breaking of the rules after such corrections will result in probation and, eventually, banishment.
We must continually ask ourselves whether victory has become more central to our goals than truth.

Apple Pie
Banned
Banned
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:51 pm

Post #35

Post by Apple Pie »

TrueReligion wrote: "Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' to traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.� (The Noble Qur'an, 2:77-79)


The Book refers to the book of the People of the Book(aka Men of Faith), which section 9 in Chapter 2 talks about. The Noble Qur'an clearly says that the Book was corrupted by men, “those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,�. It can’t get any clearer then that!

ومنهم أميون لا يعلمون الكتب إلا أماني وإن هم إلا يظنون �ويل للذين يكتبون الكتب بأيديهم ثم يقولون هذا من عند الله ليشتروا به ثمنا قليلا �ويل لهم مما كتبت أيديهم وويل لهم مما يكسبون


Waminhum ommiyyoona la yaAAlamoona alkitaba illa amaniyya wa-in hum illa yathunnoona fawaylun lillatheena yaktuboona alkitaba bi-aydeehim thumma yaqooloona hatha min AAindi Allahi liyashtaroo bihi thamanan qaleelan fawaylun lahum mimma katabat aydeehim wawaylun lahum mimma yaksiboona

And from them, who have no revealed scriptures of their own, they do not know The Book except as wishes and them except they conjecture. So woe to those, they write The Book with their hands, then they say: "This from with “allah�.� That they may acquire with it a small price, so woe to them from what their hands have written, and woe to them from what they accomplish. (2.78 – 79)


As you can see, your example is discussing those who have no revealed scriptures of their own (ommiyyoona), and who do not know (la yaAAlamoona) The Book as writing their very own brand of conjecture (yathunnoona).

These passages are not discussing mainstream Christians or Jews.

Nor are they claiming that The Holy Bible is in error in any fashion whatsoever.

TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

Post #36

Post by TrueReligion »

Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote: Told you, no comments will be provided to you, unless you learn the mannners and ethics of debate.
Is the Arabic clear?
Arabic of Quran is crystal clear, what meaning you are deriving, is not clear and not correct:)
If the Arabic was clear, then there would not be a need for so many separate and different "authorized" renderings.
The translation was made for different mind of people,. REST Quran in Arabic as only 1 version (unlike bible with several versions).
E.g Pickthal has translation similar to Greek Acsent
Yousuf Ali's translation is quite in simple english
and on and on, so its for all kind of audience, but the main thing is meaning remain same, and the original arabic didnt change and differ in any of the translation
Which is unlike in the case of Bible, as Hebrew, Greek, Samaritan, English, Latin, all have different meanings.

This clearly justifies that Bible have contradictions and errors, whereas Quran does;nbt have any error in the text, runing from 1400 till date.

TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

Post #37

Post by TrueReligion »

Apple Pie wrote:As you can see, your example is discussing those who have no revealed scriptures of their own (ommiyyoona), and who do not know (la yaAAlamoona) The Book as writing their very own brand of conjecture (yathunnoona).

These passages are not discussing mainstream Christians or Jews.

Nor are they claiming that The Holy Bible is in error in any fashion whatsoever.
For bible errors, Ive created another post "50,000 ERRORS IN BIBLE", you are invited there and discuss the errors.

http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 154#271154

Its replied already what the verse means, that the Jwes and christians (who were before muslims) have changed the scriptures.
Ofcourse this verse is said to Muslims, and Muslims dont have other scripture with them, so this verse cannot be implemented on Muslims.

Apple Pie
Banned
Banned
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:51 pm

Post #38

Post by Apple Pie »

TrueReligion wrote: This clearly justifies that Bible have contradictions and errors, whereas Quran does;nbt have any error in the text, runing from 1400 till date.
Show us a 1400 year old Koran.

TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

Post #39

Post by TrueReligion »

Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote: This clearly justifies that Bible have contradictions and errors, whereas Quran does;nbt have any error in the text, runing from 1400 till date.
Show us a 1400 year old Koran.
Read the history you will find out:)

http://jannah.org/madina/index.php?topic=335.0

Apple Pie
Banned
Banned
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:51 pm

Post #40

Post by Apple Pie »

TrueReligion wrote:
Apple Pie wrote:
TrueReligion wrote: This clearly justifies that Bible have contradictions and errors, whereas Quran does;nbt have any error in the text, runing from 1400 till date.
Show us a 1400 year old Koran.
Read the history you will find out:)

http://jannah.org/madina/index.php?topic=335.0
No 1400 year old Koran.

Another islamic myth lampooned.

Post Reply