Are Christian rights threatened by secularism?

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Are Christian rights threatened by secularism?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

Biker wrote:Also, just so long you don't impose your unbelief on my religious rights!
And I do have religious rights!
And I am quite able to defend them!
Question for debate: Which rights of Christians are being threatened in western democracies?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #21

Post by Goat »

Cephus wrote:
Furrowed Brow wrote:Yes. But the OP was asking whether Christians rights are threatened by Western democracy. My value judgment is yes the world is better off without the gender and slave ideology of old testament Christianity. But that is not the OP.
There's a difference between what would actually be a right and what Christians wish they had rights to do. There is no right to have slaves in the United States, therefore anyone of any religion who claims that they do have such rights are just wrong. Same as Christians who think they deserve special treatment because of their religion while denying those rights to other religious groups. Most of the so-called "Christian rights" I've seen are just wishful thinking in the first place and don't really exist.
I will admit that sometimes people in government react a bit odd when it comes to requests that the government does not promote one religion over another. For example, one rabbi wanted a Hanuka acknowledgment (a menorah) where a city was displaying a nativity. He complained he was not allowed to put it there, and what did the city do, but tear down the navitity scene too, and blamed it on the Rabbi.

Now, a sensible person would have said 'ok. we can put a menorah up there too'. That way, all religions can be treated equally. I bet they were worried about needing to put up a Kwanzaa symbol and some Hindu and Buddhist stuff too.
Or, they just didn't want any non-Christian symbols up, and if it meant tearing down the nativity scene, so be it , since they had a scape goat.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Cephus
Prodigy
Posts: 2991
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Redlands, CA
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #22

Post by Cephus »

goat wrote:I will admit that sometimes people in government react a bit odd when it comes to requests that the government does not promote one religion over another. For example, one rabbi wanted a Hanuka acknowledgment (a menorah) where a city was displaying a nativity. He complained he was not allowed to put it there, and what did the city do, but tear down the navitity scene too, and blamed it on the Rabbi.
They never should have used the Rabbi as a scapegoat, but they never should have had the nativity scene in the first place unless they were willing at the outset to put up any religious symbolism that may have come along afterwards. Unfortunately, you find this kind of thing all the time, Christians (primarily anyhow) who will take down their own displays in order to stop anyone else from putting them up, then complaining a lot about it and acting put out by it.

It's just hypocrisy, plain and simple.

Post Reply