See
Why He converted to Islam
I hope that you will enjoy the story
Why I converted to Islam
Moderator: Moderators
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #11
I supose for some polygamy might be a good enough reason to convert to Islam.Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this

Wants to be saved from hell assuming hell and have bought his Christian religion his rather pious mind need something more.
He bought the book and was a Bible Believer eventually taking way to much seriously where he couldn’t find it where he stood, moving on to what ever would give shape to his present beliefs. He might very well have been any esoteric ideology depending one is circumstances. Baconian science at its Bible best. I think the Mormon are just as interesting as they evolved or even Seventh Day Adventist helping us understand how it must have been when they were each creating their own traditions and writings.
He might as well stay a Christian but if he is happy so what. He still sounds like a lot of Bible Believers we hear everyday.
Yawn.
(':sleep:')
':sleep:'
:sleep:
:sleep
I can't believe I listen to the whole thing.


-
- Banned
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am
Post #12
Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this
Yeah, wat error you showed? I said wats wrong in polygamist? is it something sinfull? care to show any proof rather than just making false accusation to some1?
"Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." [Qur''''an 17:81)
Post #13
Is your name mobkem? If it isn't my reply was not for you. If you were more interested in reading than being combative you would have realized this. Obviously you will deny anything that I write simply because I am the writer, even if something is not in reply to you if I write it you apparently will assume it is in relation to you as long as I write it.TrueReligion wrote:Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this
Yeah, wat error you showed? I said wats wrong in polygamist? is it something sinfull? care to show any proof rather than just making false accusation to some1?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am
Post #14
Its not a case to whom you reply, you didnt mention for any1,and I brought your statement because you said that he has an error, so you have to show that what error is that?Wyvern wrote:Is your name mobkem? If it isn't my reply was not for you. If you were more interested in reading than being combative you would have realized this. Obviously you will deny anything that I write simply because I am the writer, even if something is not in reply to you if I write it you apparently will assume it is in relation to you as long as I write it.TrueReligion wrote:Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this
Yeah, wat error you showed? I said wats wrong in polygamist? is it something sinfull? care to show any proof rather than just making false accusation to some1?
Its debate, every1 can message on your post, if you want it to be specific for any1, than pm the user, it would be more better.
"Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." [Qur''''an 17:81)
Post #15
Then I suggest you actually read what has been written before entering into a discussion, if you would have you would have known what was being pointed out instead of simply automatically denying anything that I say.TrueReligion wrote:Its not a case to whom you reply, you didnt mention for any1,and I brought your statement because you said that he has an error, so you have to show that what error is that?Wyvern wrote:Is your name mobkem? If it isn't my reply was not for you. If you were more interested in reading than being combative you would have realized this. Obviously you will deny anything that I write simply because I am the writer, even if something is not in reply to you if I write it you apparently will assume it is in relation to you as long as I write it.TrueReligion wrote:Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this
Yeah, wat error you showed? I said wats wrong in polygamist? is it something sinfull? care to show any proof rather than just making false accusation to some1?
Its debate, every1 can message on your post, if you want it to be specific for any1, than pm the user, it would be more better.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am
Post #16
Thats what Im asking, you said you showed error of Mobkem, can you please show wat error is that? and wat was the reason that you showed the list of wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) from my article and using my name?Wyvern wrote:Then I suggest you actually read what has been written before entering into a discussion, if you would have you would have known what was being pointed out instead of simply automatically denying anything that I say.TrueReligion wrote:Its not a case to whom you reply, you didnt mention for any1,and I brought your statement because you said that he has an error, so you have to show that what error is that?Wyvern wrote:Is your name mobkem? If it isn't my reply was not for you. If you were more interested in reading than being combative you would have realized this. Obviously you will deny anything that I write simply because I am the writer, even if something is not in reply to you if I write it you apparently will assume it is in relation to you as long as I write it.TrueReligion wrote:Wyvern wrote:Your religion allows this practice but that wasn't the point. You refuted Otseng when he said he was a polygamist and I simply showed your error.mobkem wrote:Yes he was a polygamist
What is the problem in this
Yeah, wat error you showed? I said wats wrong in polygamist? is it something sinfull? care to show any proof rather than just making false accusation to some1?
Its debate, every1 can message on your post, if you want it to be specific for any1, than pm the user, it would be more better.
"Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." [Qur''''an 17:81)
Post #17
Okay I will spell this out so simply even you can not misunderstand unless you do it deliberatly.Thats what Im asking, you said you showed error of Mobkem, can you please show wat error is that? and wat was the reason that you showed the list of wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) from my article and using my name?
Otseng claimed Mohammed was a polygamist
Mobkem denied this claim
Wyvern pasted a list of the wives of Mohammed
TrueReligion is the source used for the list of wives
A good debator cites their sources which is why your name was mentioned and is the only connection you have to this comment at all. Why you got so defensive about this subject is beyond me other than you are combative whenever anyone mentions your prophets name.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am
Post #18
I think you can;t understand, where does Mobkem deny that Muhammad (pbuh) is polygamist? can you show me please rather than arguing without knowing?Wyvern wrote:Okay I will spell this out so simply even you can not misunderstand unless you do it deliberatly.Thats what Im asking, you said you showed error of Mobkem, can you please show wat error is that? and wat was the reason that you showed the list of wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) from my article and using my name?
Otseng claimed Mohammed was a polygamist
Mobkem denied this claim
Wyvern pasted a list of the wives of Mohammed
TrueReligion is the source used for the list of wives
A good debator cites their sources which is why your name was mentioned and is the only connection you have to this comment at all. Why you got so defensive about this subject is beyond me other than you are combative whenever anyone mentions your prophets name.
"Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." [Qur''''an 17:81)
Post #19
Thank you for confirming you are being deliberately obtuse. If you can't figure it out on your own no amount of help from me is going to get through to you.TrueReligion wrote:I think you can;t understand, where does Mobkem deny that Muhammad (pbuh) is polygamist? can you show me please rather than arguing without knowing?Wyvern wrote:Okay I will spell this out so simply even you can not misunderstand unless you do it deliberatly.Thats what Im asking, you said you showed error of Mobkem, can you please show wat error is that? and wat was the reason that you showed the list of wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) from my article and using my name?
Otseng claimed Mohammed was a polygamist
Mobkem denied this claim
Wyvern pasted a list of the wives of Mohammed
TrueReligion is the source used for the list of wives
A good debator cites their sources which is why your name was mentioned and is the only connection you have to this comment at all. Why you got so defensive about this subject is beyond me other than you are combative whenever anyone mentions your prophets name.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am
Post #20
No need for runing away Wyvern once lost, you claim something, now prove it as well also, making personal remarks is not good, so be brave and bring something to support your claims.Wyvern wrote:Thank you for confirming you are being deliberately obtuse. If you can't figure it out on your own no amount of help from me is going to get through to you.TrueReligion wrote:I think you can;t understand, where does Mobkem deny that Muhammad (pbuh) is polygamist? can you show me please rather than arguing without knowing?Wyvern wrote:Okay I will spell this out so simply even you can not misunderstand unless you do it deliberatly.Thats what Im asking, you said you showed error of Mobkem, can you please show wat error is that? and wat was the reason that you showed the list of wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) from my article and using my name?
Otseng claimed Mohammed was a polygamist
Mobkem denied this claim
Wyvern pasted a list of the wives of Mohammed
TrueReligion is the source used for the list of wives
A good debator cites their sources which is why your name was mentioned and is the only connection you have to this comment at all. Why you got so defensive about this subject is beyond me other than you are combative whenever anyone mentions your prophets name.
"Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." [Qur''''an 17:81)