From
Post 10:
Megaboomer wrote:
How do you determine then what age they are mature enough?
Consulting experts in the related areas.
Megaboomer wrote:
What are the emotional effects of sex?
Pleasant.
Megaboomer wrote:
What makes you believe it is wrong for example if there is a consenting adult that allows it/ signs for it.
Because a child can't give informed consent. An adult signing for a child still doesn't show the child has informed consent.
Megaboomer wrote:
My point is that if it this is at all bothering you by contemplating the implications then you have to admit that there is something morally wrong with pornography.
Only when children are involved.
Megaboomer wrote:
Pornography keeps getting worse, that’s all you see.
Might I suggest parental controls for your life.
I don't see near as much pornography as I do depictions of murder, mayhem and such.
Megaboomer wrote:
why should we even allow something that gives the potential for so much risk.
FREEDOM! FREEDOM! FREEDOM! Cars are risky, are you willing to give up yours?
Megaboomer wrote:
as a Christian I ask myself not what can I get away with?, what is legal?,
As a freedom loving atheist, I do ask myself how I can "get away with" certain things my religiously motivated peers consider I shouldn't be doing.
Megaboomer wrote:
does it matter if it doesn’t effect me?, but I ask myself is this going to cause problems for somebody who is struggling? Is this something that makes me a better person? Or is this going to hurt someone?
Valid concerns I ask as well.
Megaboomer wrote:
Well if you want to go on that basis there is a heck of a lot more Christian/religious women in the world than not. Therefore most women in relationships should be offended by their significant other participating in it.
This doesn't address those relationships where
both are willing to engage in pornography.
Megaboomer wrote:
A Christian should, after accepting Jesus, continue to grow in their relationship with God. And not continue in sin.
Can you offer
verifiable evidence your preferred god doesn't condone pornography, or are you just parroting the Bible?
Megaboomer wrote:
Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
I want no part of a "kingdom" that doesn't accept folks for who they are. I agree theives and extortionists are a dastardly bunch, but the rest of those folks are no worse than oppressive Christians.
Megaboomer wrote:
Yah people are loosing their morals more and more every day in this country, I wonder what the causes of that are.
Morals are pretty much always in a state of flux. Do you wear mixed fabrics?
Megaboomer wrote:
This site shows the opinion of many psychiatrists.
Argumentum ad populum.
Megaboomer wrote:
this is what the writer say’s about pornography : “Distorted views of perverted sex acts are presented as exciting and acceptable, and in many instances, the viewer is exposed to otherwise unimaginable ideas about sexuality that they themselves would never have considered.�
So the dude don't like porn. I'd tell him not to look at it.
Megaboomer wrote:
the fact is that pornography twists the true way that sex should be. Should something this dangerous be alowed? Is it wrong to make it harder for people to be good?
What is this "true way sex should be"? Let me guess,
your favored way?
Again, driving in traffic is dangerous, are you willing to go back to walking?
It's wrong to make it harder for folks to be good when you declare a God is the one doing the judging of what is good or not.
Megaboomer wrote:
So do you think as a suggestion that we should all let our kids experience pornography even at young ages?
Of course not. Nor should one have a cow when a child does happen to see it (barring adult interference).
Megaboomer wrote:
well #1- it sure is not healthy according to psychiatrists
I don't know where you get this claim. You imply
all psychiatrists, and I don't think you can support this.
Megaboomer wrote:
it may be fun and popular but that doesn’t mean it’s good
Nor does it means it's bad.
Megaboomer wrote:
if you put 2 and 2 together something even something that’s ok for most people but stumbling for a lot of people is still bad.
That folks "stumble" is on them. I'd propose more practice.
Megaboomer wrote:
Yah sex is fun to play around with huh. “Recently in the U.S. it was reported that the sexually transmissible diseases, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and AIDS, were the three most commonly reported infectious disorders in 1995.� - Noel Hornor.
Doesn't address those who practice safe sex. Given that the religious majority has a coniption at any mention of meaningful sex education, I'd say this'n doesn't reflect what could occur with better information.
Megaboomer wrote:
Also according to the 2000 Census, there are currently about 11 million people living with an unmarried partner in the U.S. This includes both same-sex and different-sex couples. The number of unmarried couples living together increased 72% between 1990 and 2000. The number of unmarried couples living together has increased tenfold between 1960 and 2000.
What's your point?
Megaboomer wrote:
studies also show that the increase of internet pages and access has increased in a even greater period within 14 million to 260 million 1998-2003 according to the U.S. senate judiciary committee. That’s 5 years.
Folks'll get their porn, the internet just makes it so much easier.
Megaboomer wrote:
The growth in parallel is huge and the fact is that the industry really doesn’t care if they get kids into it or not. Only 3% of internet pornography requires age verification.
Are you of legal age to enter? Click YES for PORN, click NO for NO PORN.
Yeah, that sounds effective.
Megaboomer wrote:
even if the belief that porn is ok as long as it’s regulated was true there’s nobody that lives up to even there own standards. because the fact is that there is little to nothing being done about this issue.
I'd propose it's because so many folks don't see anything wrong with it. Seems it takes an undefined critical mass to "muster the troops", and again, I'd propose it's cause folks just aren't that concerned about it.
Megaboomer wrote:
Also the type of porn is getting worse and worse. Is this coincidence? Or is it a supply to demand. All these things and much more can track along side the increase of tolerance of pornography and other things in the History of the united states.
Actually, since I don't have to rely on Playboy for my porn fix, I'd say the non-airbrushed aspect is exceedingly much better.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin