On prayer

Chat viewable by general public

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
FinalEnigma
Site Supporter
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Bryant, AR

On prayer

Post #1

Post by FinalEnigma »

This thread was spawned by a discussion here: http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 574#222574
Hi Final, Good to hear from you friend. I would say a couple of things about praying. Some things take a long time. Other's are right away. Not only is the act of praying an art of becoming completly sincere. The act of receiving the answer is an art of becoming receptive and intuitive to the many ways an answer may reach you. You may have heard this many times Final. But it is something that takes a while to distinguish.
Actually, despite talking to pastors and such, I've never been told that.
I also think that sometimes the involvement of someone else helps for some reason. I think the reason is to show that co-operative effort is more valuable than solo effort. We are here for each other is one of the simplest and hardest lessons to learn. But in time the profundity of that concept, in regards to being God like or doing God's Will, is not Lost on one. Very Happy Here's a few things to consider about Prayer that may help in the success of One's test. I think one of the most important things is, "If at first you don't succeed, try try again."
Indeed, and I at one point prayed for the same thing day after day for easily over a month. The content of the prayer I don't wish to be public, so if you think it is relevant, Pm me.
Aside from all that is superself in the experience of praying, it should be remembered that ethical prayer is a splendid way to elevate one's ego and reinforce the self for better living and higher attainment. Prayer induces the human ego to look both ways for help: for material aid to the subconscious reservoir of mortal experience, for inspiration and guidance to the superconscious borders of the contact of the material with the spiritual
I can't dispute that, as I don't have the info, and wouldn't care to anyway. I would state however, that my purpose in prayer was only rarely psychological(during the time I was suffering from major depression, prayed for help, and then bad things happened to me/my family)
No prayer can be ethical when the petitioner seeks for selfish advantage over his fellows. Selfish and materialistic praying is incompatible with the ethical religions which are predicated on unselfish and divine love. All such unethical praying reverts to the primitive levels of pseudo magic and is unworthy of advancing civilizations and enlightened religions. Selfish praying transgresses the spirit of all ethics founded on loving justice.

In all your praying be fair; do not expect God to show partiality, to love you more than his other children, your friends, neighbors, even enemies....Egoistic prayers involve confessions and petitions and often consist in requests for material favors. Prayer is somewhat more ethical when it deals with forgiveness and seeks wisdom for enhanced self-control.

While the nonselfish type of prayer is strengthening and comforting, materialistic praying is destined to bring disappointment and disillusionment as advancing scientific discoveries demonstrate that man lives in a physical universe of law and order. The childhood of an individual or a race is characterized by primitive, selfish, and materialistic praying. And, to a certain extent, all such petitions are efficacious in that they unvaryingly lead to those efforts and exertions which are contributory to achieving the answers to such prayers. The real prayer of faith always contributes to the augmentation of the technique of living, even if such petitions are not worthy of spiritual recognition.
To clarify, my prayers were never materialistic(not that I think you are saying they are). I am very much not a materialistic person. Objects, things don't matter to me. People matter to me. Nature matters to me.

My prayers also were not selfish, unless you count "Please God, save me. I don't have the strength to save myself." as selfish. (again. back when I was very depressed.)

from your phrasing above, it almost seems as if one cannot pray for anything that you could possibly be able to tell if it were answered. if you cannot pray for petitions, then you do not seem able to ask for anything, and praying for self-characteristics is not possible to detect answers on, and most likely an answer would be meaningless anyway, as, by your account, praying for it will cause you to develop it yourself anyway.
Prayer must never be so prostituted as to become a substitute for action. All ethical prayer is a stimulus to action and a guide to the progressive striving for idealistic goals of superself-attainment.
How does this apply to prayers for something that you cannot possibly affect yourself. I never prayed for anything I thought I could effect myself, because it would seem ridiculous and lazy.
If you would like to try an experiment with me either on thread or via PM I would be more than amenable to such a joint effort. Peace be with you friend.
Potentially possible, but i want to understand before I would do so.

User avatar
FinalEnigma
Site Supporter
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Bryant, AR

Post #11

Post by FinalEnigma »

joer wrote:Final wrote:
So prayer has changed from what it was in the bible? or was it only Jesus and the disciples that prayed for overt, physical things and received them?
What was it in the Bible? What overt physical things did JC and the apostles pray for and receive? Do you have a specific example?
Things such as healing of others, who were then instantly healed. or for the food to multiply to feed the multitude. Such prayers as these are not granted anymore - at least to my knowledge and (if I understand) your testament.
You also write:
And, to be certain, prayers for overt physical miracles/things will not be granted?
That’s not what I get out of this answer:

Prayer is not a technique for curing real and organic diseases, but it has contributed enormously to the enjoyment of abundant health and to the cure of numerous mental, emotional, and nervous ailments. And even in actual bacterial disease, prayer has many times added to the efficacy of other remedial procedures. Prayer has turned many an irritable and complaining invalid into a paragon of patience and made him an inspiration to all other human sufferers.
This sounds to me like prayer does a whole lot for people, to make them happier and emotionally/mentally healthier, but, as you said, it does not cure diseases. What kind of overt physical things will prayer do? can you(I mean you in general, not specifically you) multiply food with prayer? can you restore sight to the blind?

What I get is that the cure will be quite natural even as far as healing is concerned expedited or accelerated by the act and power of prayer. So you see, we see the same answer quite differently.
So the cure is natural and aided by prayer, but is not done instantly by prayer, or done in any overt manner? and by overt manner I mean a way that is obviously response to prayer and cannot be explained by other means.

You write:
when you pray, the effect will only be upon your own mindset? or is it a bit broader than that?
It’s broader than that:

No prayer can hope for an answer unless it is born of the spirit and nurtured by faith. Your sincere faith implies that you have in advance virtually granted your prayer hearers the full right to answer your petitions in accordance with that supreme wisdom and that divine love which your faith depicts as always actuating those beings to whom you pray.
Sorry, I tend to get lost when you get into language like 'born of the spirit and nurtured by faith' What does it mean for a prayer to be born of the spirit?
Do not hesitate to pray the prayers of spirit longing; doubt not that you shall receive the answer to your petitions. These answers will be on deposit, awaiting your achievement of those future spiritual levels of actual cosmic attainment, on this world or on others, whereon it will become possible for you to recognize and appropriate the long-waiting answers to your earlier but ill-timed petitions.
This strikes me as really odd. almost as some sort of banking/credit system, where different prayers require different amounts of...spiritual maturity, ill say...and if you pray for that thing before you reach the needed level of maturity, then you will get it once you reach the required level. is this what you mean?

Quote:
You write:
Quote:
When men [or women] pray for providential intervention in the circumstances of life, many times the answer to their prayer is their own changed attitudes toward life.
This would seem very odd. People don't want changed attitudes. I realize God doesn't care what people want, hes doing his own thing, but this brings me to-
God Does care my friend. The problem is some people have a hard time seeing or believing that and it affects there capacity to communicate with God.
Sorry, that wasn't what I meant. What I meant was that God will do things according to his wishes, and that if he decides to answer your prayer a certain way, it doesn't really affect it that you want it answered a different way.
The sincerity of any prayer is the assurance of its being heard; the spiritual wisdom and universe consistency of any petition is the determiner of the time, manner, and degree of the answer. A wise father does not literally answer the foolish prayers of his ignorant and inexperienced children, albeit the children may derive much pleasure and real soul satisfaction from the making of such absurd petitions.
Okay, so your prayers will be best answered if they are wise prayers and in line with God's plans?
You write:
I'm not sure what prayer does for me. It doesn't seem useful for anything. If I want to change my attitude on some aspect of life which is negative to me, or if I (justifiably) want to feel better about an event that happened and I cannot effect this myself(which I am becoming able to do much more easily), I'll talk to a therapist, or, if I don't want to waste the money, have a 30 minute conversation with a friend of mine, and my whole outlook on the situation becomes more positive.
Prayer will amplify the positive effects of what you do, if it is sincere and is a good thing that you pray for and a good attitude with which you pray with.

You conclude with:
When I prayed for my friend in the army, I didn't want to be accepting of the situation, I wanted him to feel better. Changing my views on the matter wasn't going to help anything. If my prayer can't help a sick friend, or help starving children across the world, then what use is it?
If it changes your attitude toward the situation to a more positive one. It could be of tremendous use. :D

Thanks Final for your post.
I will let this line largely go for the moment while some of my other questions are answered. only with the exception that I want to point out that in times of significant need for me, if I pray for God's intervention, I don't really see a response that changes my viewpoint on the issue as helpful. If I were to say - pray for my mom to get her diabetes under control(not a cure, just for her to have it under control), then I don't see the benefit of altering my attitude. I don't want to feel better about the situation, I want her to be healthier. My prayer is not for me - it seeks to help her.
We do not hate others because of the flaws in their souls, we hate them because of the flaws in our own.

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Post #12

Post by Zzyzx »

.
If prayer influenced "god" to alter the course of events, "god" was not omniscient because "he" did not know in advance that "his plan" would be changed.

If "god" did know in advance that he would "alter a plan" and that a "prayer would be answered", then prayer had no effect upon the outcome of events.

Either way, the apologist "argument" concerning prayers being answered is evidently self-contradictory -- and is evidence AGAINST believing bible stories and preachers.
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
joer
Guru
Posts: 1410
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Post #13

Post by joer »

Zzyzx wrote:.
If prayer influenced "god" to alter the course of events, "god" was not omniscient because "he" did not know in advance that "his plan" would be changed.

If "god" did know in advance that he would "alter a plan" and that a "prayer would be answered", then prayer had no effect upon the outcome of events.

Either way, the apologist "argument" concerning prayers being answered is evidently self-contradictory -- and is evidence AGAINST believing bible stories and preachers.
Hey Z, Good to see my friend. O:) It's really only contradictory in the way you've subjectively interpreted it.

If "God's Plan" was met to be interactive. And his infinity is really infinity. Then it is ever expanding and never-ending unlike the FINITE interpretation you gave of God's Plan. If in his infinite Plan our co-creative cooperation was intended to be included and used to help us develop in understanding, wisdom and experience. And if in so doing it becomes part of an ever expanding experiential reality aspect of GOD, then in that interpretation of God's Plan it would be perfectly logical and REAL.

So perhaps the problem as you perceive it is not the Plan but the interpretation of it. Your conceptual model is a finite model. Yet the question you pose requires an model to contain the possibility of the answer to your question.

So one might ask, why would conceptually construct a finite model to represent a concept that embraces infinity?

It cause me to remember a religious man a minister who was contemplating the reality of God and searching for a universal conceptualization that would more accurately represent the God he fathomed. His ruminations led him to the conceptual framework we now call calculus, it which infinity is an active parameter in the mathematical calculations. Remember him Z? Sir Issac Newton.

Perhaps in the future another Religionist contemplating the reality of God will create a better conceptual framework that will replace Calculus. But until then we have to rely on the best conceptual framework we have.

It's the same in our conceptualization of God Zzy. And your finite model defeating the logic of a question of infinite proportions, doesn't quite make it my friend. We'll have to try again.
O:)
Thanks for the post Z. It seems to me and perhaps it's not lost on Final Enigma, that even if God did not exist, Prayer may have intrinsic value in and of itself. But I have to admit the God/human relationship concept, That is us being sons and daughters of God with the promise of infinite eternal universe life ahead of us is very interesting and seems to mesh well with the amazing reality of life, levels of evolutionary development and metamorphosis.

User avatar
joer
Guru
Posts: 1410
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Post #14

Post by joer »

Final wrote:
Things such as healing of others, who were then instantly healed. or for the food to multiply to feed the multitude. Such prayers as these are not granted anymore - at least to my knowledge and (if I understand) your testament.

This sounds to me like prayer does a whole lot for people, to make them happier and emotionally/mentally healthier, but, as you said, it does not cure diseases. What kind of overt physical things will prayer do? can you(I mean you in general, not specifically you) multiply food with prayer? can you restore sight to the blind?
I would suggest pray for things that you really need. Like your mom’s diabetes. Pray to God to help YOU DO what you can to HELP YOU deal with the effects of her disease. And Pray to God to give her the strength, knowledge and will power to make choices that will help her bring her disease under control. That would be much more effective than praying for a miraculous healing.IMHO

BUT if you want to try to pray for a miraculous cure, reach for the most profound faithful spiritual sense of being that you can achieve and ask God in all humility, admitting that you have no reason that God should perform this gift for you, but acknowledge that God because of how much he loves you and your mom, you would request that He and all the celestials beings available to you and her, to the extent that they are allowed in accordance with the Will of OUR FATHER heal her to maximum allowable extent of their ability.

I cannot judge the extent that you can reach in the sincerity of your belief that God and God’s Spirit within you, CAN heal your mother to the extent that you wish. And I don’t want to setup false hope. I’m advised by fellow believers that praying for Miracles is not in accordance with God’s Will. But I can’t help myself from trying. Even though I know my faith isn’t that strong. I would recommend the daily praying for you and her to become better able to deal with her disease. I do have confidence in that if you keep it up until you see the change. NO MATTER how long it takes.
Your sincere faith implies that you have in advance virtually granted your prayer hearers the full right to answer your petitions in accordance with that supreme wisdom and that divine love which your faith depicts as always actuating those beings to whom you pray.
When you pray for the sick and afflicted, do not expect that your petitions will take the place of loving and intelligent ministry to the necessities of these afflicted ones. Pray for the welfare of your families, friends, and fellows,

You wrote:
So the cure is natural and aided by prayer, but is not done instantly by prayer, or done in any overt manner? and by overt manner I mean a way that is obviously response to prayer and cannot be explained by other means.
God is so all real and absolute that no material sign of proof or no demonstration of so-called miracle may be offered in testimony of his reality. Always will we know him because we trust him, and our belief in him is wholly based on our personal participation in the divine manifestations of his infinite reality.

You contiue with:
Sorry, I tend to get lost when you get into language like 'born of the spirit and nurtured by faith' What does it mean for a prayer to be born of the spirit?
It means it comes from the Spirit of God within you. That’s why faith is so important in praying. It strengthens the connection you have to the Spirit of God within you. Here's some quotes about it.

"But when to pray, I will not say. Only the spirit that dwells within you may move you to the utterance of those petitions which are expressive of your inner relationship with the Father of spirits."
2 Corinthians 3:17 (Compare) "Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."
Galatians 4:6-7 (Compare) "And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ."
Romans 8:2 (Compare) "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death."
Romans 8:15-16 (Compare) "For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God."
Ezekiel 36:26 (Compare) "A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh."
Psalms 51:10 (Compare) "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me."
1 Corinthians 3:16-17 (Compare) "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
1 John 4:12-15 (Compare) "No man hath seen God at any time.
If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.
Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit.
And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.
Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God."
2 Timothy 1:14 (Compare) "That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us."
Luke 17:21 (Same) "Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you."
Romans 8:9-11 (Compare) "But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you.

Here you conclude Final:
I will let this line largely go for the moment while some of my other questions are answered. only with the exception that I want to point out that in times of significant need for me, if I pray for God's intervention, I don't really see a response that changes my viewpoint on the issue as helpful. If I were to say - pray for my mom to get her diabetes under control(not a cure, just for her to have it under control), then I don't see the benefit of altering my attitude. I don't want to feel better about the situation, I want her to be healthier. My prayer is not for me - it seeks to help her.
Maybe altering your attitude my mean something other than you expect. Perhaps “feeling better� is not the change in attitude that will occur. The logical expectation would be a change in attitude that engendered a positive change in her condition. Whatever that might be.

When you pray for the sick and afflicted, do not expect that your petitions will take the place of loving and intelligent ministry to the necessities of these afflicted ones. Pray for the welfare of your families, friends, and fellows.

Well Final if it is alright with you I will pray for you and your mother. If you wish to PM to pray together. I’m available for that also.

Good Will to you my friend.
:D

User avatar
Nilloc James
Site Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Canada

Post #15

Post by Nilloc James »

If "God's Plan" was met to be interactive
Well outside of the bible it seems not interactive however in the bible he seemed to be slipting seas and raining bread at a whim.

User avatar
joer
Guru
Posts: 1410
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Post #16

Post by joer »

Nilloc James wrote:
If "God's Plan" was met to be interactive
Well outside of the bible it seems not interactive however in the bible he seemed to be slipting seas and raining bread at a whim.
Hi Nilloc. Your right. If one is looking for seas parting and raining bread outside the Bible. My POV is that you will be disappointed. BUT two thousand years ago and even today people want to see those unreal miracles of spectacular unnatural events.

It's just not what God Taught. And as soon as one stops trying to defend these spectacular things from the Bible the sooner they can concentrate on the everyday things of value. Like making peace in the world. establishing the brotherhood and sisterhood of human kind.

I'm not saying that God can't perform Supernatural Things. I'm saying we haven't even realized how Supernatural us being here on this planet of Life, a tiny beautiful blue speck a mid thousands of lifeless spheres. The natural healing of the body. The process of evolution, the power of positive thinking, the caring for one another in a non-destructive way. Those are miracles.

How can we think looking for Supernatural events is the right thing to do, when we CAN'T EVEN GRASP how Supernatural it is that we are here AT ALL!

people need to quit looking for miracles and focus on aiding, preserving and amplifying the truth, beauty and goodness of the Miracle of Life we already have.

You want to see a spectacular miracle. "Look at that tree!" "That's not a miracle it's just a Tree" "Lets see you make one!" :D

User avatar
Nilloc James
Site Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Canada

Post #17

Post by Nilloc James »

joer wrote:
Nilloc James wrote:
If "God's Plan" was met to be interactive
Well outside of the bible it seems not interactive however in the bible he seemed to be slipting seas and raining bread at a whim.
Hi Nilloc. Your right. If one is looking for seas parting and raining bread outside the Bible. My POV is that you will be disappointed. BUT two thousand years ago and even today people want to see those unreal miracles of spectacular unnatural events.

It's just not what God Taught. And as soon as one stops trying to defend these spectacular things from the Bible the sooner they can concentrate on the everyday things of value. Like making peace in the world. establishing the brotherhood and sisterhood of human kind.

I'm not saying that God can't perform Supernatural Things. I'm saying we haven't even realized how Supernatural us being here on this planet of Life, a tiny beautiful blue speck a mid thousands of lifeless spheres. The natural healing of the body. The process of evolution, the power of positive thinking, the caring for one another in a non-destructive way. Those are miracles.

How can we think looking for Supernatural events is the right thing to do, when we CAN'T EVEN GRASP how Supernatural it is that we are here AT ALL!

people need to quit looking for miracles and focus on aiding, preserving and amplifying the truth, beauty and goodness of the Miracle of Life we already have.

You want to see a spectacular miracle. "Look at that tree!" "That's not a miracle it's just a Tree" "Lets see you make one!" :D
ROFL your last line made me laugh.

Well about us being here and having this nice little planet:

Due to the massive number of planets it seems to me that eventually one will arrive that "won the lottery" and could support life. Maybe it is less we got lucky but, someone has to have the winning ticket, earth won the cosmic lttery.

That probably sounds like a garbled mess.

Anyways I just found a new train of thought I want to follow lets see if it makes sense:

I'll skip abiogenisis because I am not an incredibly scientific person and hop to single celled organisms. You mention evolution and stated it as fact from how I understood it. Maybe it is hard looking back from where we are no however I want to start from the beggining:

Early life varies more and more until it is two species, this continues until the variety is so great it is hard to see any similarity despire it starting at the same spot.

THen early people not understanding the slow process of how we got here insert a [insert any creation myth here] not compreheding the path evolution took.

I can see the difficulty people have seeing that humans came out of early sludge (metaphore/analogy, I'm not sure about the sludge part).

However if we came out looking far different we'd probably say the same thing about our form then.

And if that made 0 sense it does not suprise me...

User avatar
joer
Guru
Posts: 1410
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Post #18

Post by joer »

Nilloc, perhaps Final Enigma won't mind if we diverge a bit as long as upon his return or that of another we return to Topic. You wrote:
ROFL your last line made me laugh.

Well about us being here and having this nice little planet:

Due to the massive number of planets it seems to me that eventually one will arrive that "won the lottery" and could support life. Maybe it is less we got lucky but, someone has to have the winning ticket, earth won the cosmic lttery.

That probably sounds like a garbled mess.
It doesn’t sound like a mess at all Nilloc. It makes prefect sense. I have no doubt there are MILLIONS of Life Planets like ours. The Universes is to big for there now to be. But at the same time there are BILLIONS or Trillions without Life. All this is speculation just as how the first strand of DNA that contained the code for all Life within it was formed. Even the Vatican Astronomers last year stated Life on other planets is inevitable and the Pope declared any aliens with a God Knowing capacity (souls) are our brothers and sisters in God. So he circumvented a lot of arguments by stating that a priori. You wrote:
Anyways I just found a new train of thought I want to follow lets see if it makes sense:

I'll skip abiogenisis because I am not an incredibly scientific person and hop to single celled organisms. You mention evolution and stated it as fact from how I understood it. Maybe it is hard looking back from where we are no however I want to start from the beggining:
I think abiogenisis is where it’s at. The Primordial soup. My mother, an atheist, gave me a Life Magazine Book on the origin of Life and gave me as well a printed scientific article talking about the amino acids and chemicals necessary for life. Then she speculated on how that first spark of Life started. Maybe a lightning strike, a magnetic confluence, something that was just right where Life auto-started. That was between 1958 and 1960. The other model, a divinely guided and initiated spark of Life. Life implatation into the primordial soup that evolved to the point of being ready to support life. Then evolution into the first Homo spieces called human.

Abiogenesis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis you wrote:
Early life varies more and more until it is two species, this continues until the variety is so great it is hard to see any similarity despire it starting at the same spot.

THen early people not understanding the slow process of how we got here insert a [insert any creation myth here] not compreheding the path evolution took.

I can see the difficulty people have seeing that humans came out of early sludge (metaphore/analogy, I'm not sure about the sludge part).

However if we came out looking far different we'd probably say the same thing about our form then.

And if that made 0 sense it does not suprise me...
If makes prefect sense to me. Nilloc. With the accidents of evolution we could have developed into quite a different spices capable of God recognition weather imagined, real or not realized.

One question you revolve around is Intelligent Design vs. Evolution debate. This debate Which I recently found some closure with. I found it’s not one or the other but both. And it makes sense in the God Model of having guided evolutionary changes up until the first being evolved capable of having Free Will capacity. That is a creature that was capable of having a soul and the capacity of knowing God. Even if it didn’t know God. It had developed the capacity.

So both models are speculative. We don’t KNOW that either are true. And we (as believers and non-believers) speculate that either is possible. But neither can be proven by any evidence known to humankind….YET. :D

User avatar
Nilloc James
Site Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Canada

Post #19

Post by Nilloc James »

Thanks for the response,

I agreed with the majority you said and have a comment on one thing you said
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution debate
I personally don't beleive that there was a god holding that hand of evolution the entire time, my reasons being evolutionary "left overs" that a guide probably would have scraped.

A god that worked through nature alone and did nothing (as in put any intelligance into design) and just watched and maybe triggered things like abiogensis througn natural means sounds reasonable. However my only irk with that theory is the god becomes totaly irrelavent in the logical purpose and seems to me tack on the scientific process.

So it sounds reasobale but not logical to me.
That is a creature that was capable of having a soul and the capacity of knowing God. Even if it didn’t know God
I'm just wondering about this:

If we didn't know our creator could we hope to comprehend him and recreate him in the bible?

In other words: There might be a god, we just have not thought of it yet.

User avatar
joer
Guru
Posts: 1410
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Post #20

Post by joer »

Nilloc James wrote:Thanks for the response,

I agreed with the majority you said and have a comment on one thing you said
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution debate
I personally don't beleive that there was a god holding that hand of evolution the entire time, my reasons being evolutionary "left overs" that a guide probably would have scraped.

A god that worked through nature alone and did nothing (as in put any intelligance into design) and just watched and maybe triggered things like abiogensis througn natural means sounds reasonable. However my only irk with that theory is the god becomes totaly irrelavent in the logical purpose and seems to me tack on the scientific process.

So it sounds reasobale but not logical to me.
That is a creature that was capable of having a soul and the capacity of knowing God. Even if it didn’t know God
I'm just wondering about this:

If we didn't know our creator could we hope to comprehend him and recreate him in the bible?

In other words: There might be a god, we just have not thought of it yet.
Hi James, Hope all is well for you my friend.

I hear what your saying. Like this:
I personally don't believe that there was a god holding that hand of evolution the entire time, my reasons being evolutionary "left overs" that a guide probably would have scraped.
So you're are right it's not logical because there's too many suppositons in it.

It just seems to me like it's so far removed from where we are at in two things. How we are today (compared to then). And our still yet minimal knowledge of the processes of how we got here. I think at some future date with our developing systems of recognition and detection of the details of evolution as well as a larger scope of cumulative knowledge we'll be better prepared to understand and critically analyze BOTH of these speculative ideas. Right Now our incursion into the Scientific discovery and information age is still too NEW to give us more definitive answers on either side of the debate. But it certainly is a question worth asking and investigating along both avenues. IMHO :D
That is a creature that was capable of having a soul and the capacity of knowing God. Even if it didn’t know God
I'm just wondering about this:

If we didn't know our creator could we hope to comprehend him and recreate him in the bible?
I mean a million years ago we weren't developed enough to know God. :D

Thanks James. O:)

Post Reply