Is it grammatically correct to equate the verb to be with the genitive of possession?
This question arose in my mind due to someone claiming: "I am my body".
Another way of putting it would be to ask, "Is being equivalent to having"?
I suspect that the answer to both question is, "no".
This doesn't seem to be enough to prove my case though.
As closely related as identification is to identity, identification is not identity, and an abstract construction of the mind cannot be a physical body.
On a forum where believers accept the existence of demons who possess bodies, I am bewildered as to their insistence in adopting this same characteristic themselves.
For those who don't accept this idea, I can only rely upon grammar.
Grammatical accuracy
Definition of terms and explanation of concepts
Moderator: Moderators
Return to “Definitions and Explanations”
Jump to
- Information
- ↳ Announcements
- ↳ Comments, Suggestions, and Questions
- ↳ Registration and Login
- Awards
- Debate
- ↳ Christianity and Apologetics
- ↳ Theology, Doctrine, and Dogma
- ↳ Science and Religion
- ↳ Philosophy
- ↳ Politics and Religion
- ↳ Right and Wrong
- ↳ Current Events
- ↳ Religion in Entertainment
- ↳ Non-Christian Religions and Philosophies
- ↳ Religion and Sexuality
- Spotlight
- ↳ Spotlight on Racism
- ↳ Shroud of Turin
- Specialized Debate
- ↳ Book debates
- ↳ Head-to-head
- ↳ H2H Requests
- General Discussion
- ↳ General Chat
- ↳ Questions for a Group
- ↳ Questions About a Belief
- ↳ Putting Our Heads Together
- ↳ Ethical Dilemmas
- ↳ The A Room
- ↳ Holy Huddle Room
- ↳ Definitions and Explanations
- ↳ Random Ramblings
- Custom Usergroup Discussion
- ↳ Bible Study
- ↳ Islam
- ↳ Science And Technology
- ↳ Physical Fitness and Health
- ↳ Around The Camp Fire
- ↳ Book Club
- Miscellaneous
- ↳ Probation
- ↳ MPG
- ↳ The Outer Darkness
- ↳ Judaism
- ↳ Catholicism
- ↳ Psychology/Sociology
- ↳ Seminary Students
- ↳ Seminary Life
- ↳ Research Questions/Discussions
- ↳ The LGBTQIA Refuge
- ↳ Many Paths
- ↳ Logics