It is said that religion is the opiate of the masses.
How does ethics avoid a similar attack?
Religion v Ethics
Moderator: Moderators
- Wootah
- Savant
- Posts: 9462
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Religion v Ethics
Post #1Proverbs 18:17 The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.
Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826
"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image
."
Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826
"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image

-
- Savant
- Posts: 6224
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
- Location: Charlotte
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #71
[Replying to post 70 by JP Cusick]
Moderator Comment
Please review the Rules.
Repeated unsubstantiated claim
Telling people to go fishing for evidence to support your argument is not really congruent with thhe rules. Posters are required to substantiate their claims.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Moderator Comment
Please review the Rules.
Repeated unsubstantiated claim
.So there is evidence if one really searched for the info, but it is not going to be reported in mainstream News or documentaries
Telling people to go fishing for evidence to support your argument is not really congruent with thhe rules. Posters are required to substantiate their claims.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Post 1: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:48 am Otseng has been banned
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
- help3434
- Guru
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #72So more claims that this movement of white racists moving away from Christianity and taking up Atheism but not evidence or examples. Surprise, surprise. If your claim is true then why are there all these white supremacists groups that are Christian Identity rather than atheistic? I have heard of white supremacists adopting neo-paganism because they want a religion white European rather than Jewish roots but that is not atheism.JP Cusick wrote:I think it is because I am one of the few repentant white people, so I confess our shared white sins and it makes me a traitor to the white cause.help3434 wrote: A lot of white racists gave up the Democratic Party after the civil rights movement of the 60s but you are the only person I ever heard claim that a bunch of white people abandoned Christianity and theism because of the civil rights movement. Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
So there is evidence if one really searched for the info, but it is not going to be reported in mainstream News or documentaries.
I was born in 1956 so I grew up in the transition times when whites still had Christian roots but it was changing over to Atheism, and we had race riots in every school at those times and open racial hostilities, but the Courts and the Federal government required that there be integration, and the black people were highly religious and they would seek friendship based on our common Christianity, and so white people started pulling away and Atheism became the new battle cry for whites,
That picture doesn't show any such thing.JP Cusick wrote: and especially the "evolution" which shows that whites are the highest evolved and blacks as the lowest evolved, see picture HERE.
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #73There are really very few white-racist who claim Christianity, and it hurts the few that do, because the best non violent weapon against the KKK is to preach Jesus and the love of God to them.help3434 wrote: If your claim is true then why are there all these white supremacists groups that are Christian Identity rather than atheistic?
The Atheism is a very clever way of pushing the white superiority through the theory of evolution and of course the survival of the fittest in natural selection.
In every case it is the white race which is the highest evolved, and the whites are the fittest which is why we dominate, and so on it goes.
SIGNATURE:
An unorthodox Theist & a heretic Christian:
An unorthodox Theist & a heretic Christian:
- help3434
- Guru
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #74[Replying to post 73 by JP Cusick]
You still haven't given any evidence or examples of racists turning to atheism because of religious civil rights activists like Martin Luther King.
You still haven't given any evidence or examples of racists turning to atheism because of religious civil rights activists like Martin Luther King.
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #75What happened back then is interesting but it is not as important as what we have now today.help3434 wrote: You still haven't given any evidence or examples of racists turning to atheism because of religious civil rights activists like Martin Luther King.
The theory of evolution is pushed as a racist ideology of white supremacy because us whites are seen as the highest evolved, see picture HERE.
A picture does speaks louder than does the denials.
And of course the survival of the fittest = Racist Comments Here.
SIGNATURE:
An unorthodox Theist & a heretic Christian:
An unorthodox Theist & a heretic Christian:
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 15229
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 974 times
- Been thanked: 1799 times
- Contact:
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #76[Replying to post 75 by JP Cusick]
Indeed, racism isn't restricted to atheism, and theism is able to incorporate evolution.
I think there is some point to this being the case then, but now - not so much, if at all.The theory of evolution is pushed as a racist ideology of white supremacy because us whites are seen as the highest evolved
Indeed, racism isn't restricted to atheism, and theism is able to incorporate evolution.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 6224
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
- Location: Charlotte
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #77
[Replying to post 75 by JP Cusick]
Moderator Warning
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

Not only is this spam, it can also be considered inflammatory. Stop posting random illustrations that in no way insinuate what you are claiming. If you are going to make charges of racism please take it seriously and support your claim with actual direct evidence.The theory of evolution is pushed as a racist ideology of white supremacy because us whites are seen as the highest evolved, see picture HERE.
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Post 1: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:48 am Otseng has been banned
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
-
- Sage
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 3:19 pm
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #78So Ethics is not binding on the Atheism people and the like. They maybe ethical or non-ethical. Is it by way on a whim with them, please?Bust Nak wrote:We don't have to, we do it because we want to.paarsurrey1 wrote: I appreciate if Atheism people believe in some ethics and it makes me happy, yet, why they believe in Ethics? They don't have to. Right, please?
There isn't any codex of ethics and morality for atheism.Since we have so many from the Atheism and the like here, I request if they could express the codex of their Ethics and Morality, if any. Right, please?
Regards
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Religion v Ethics
Post #79Correct. This is true for everyone, atheists and theists alike, theists too maybe ethical or non-ethical. Is it by way on a whim with theists, even with their codex of ethics and morality. We have plenty of example of theists who disregard what their codex says, or interpret it ways that would not typically be considered ethical.paarsurrey1 wrote: So Ethics is not binding on the Atheism people and the like. They maybe ethical or non-ethical. Is it by way on a whim with them, please?