Is there any scientific justification for the notion of Free Will?
Question #1. If you believe their is, can you please state your scientific evidence for the existence of Free Will.
Question #2. If you believe there is no scientific justification for the notion of Free Will, then please explain how we can have any scientific justification for holding anyone responsible for their actions. In fact, wouldn't the very notion of personal responsibility be scientifically unsupportable?
Scientific Justification for Free Will?
Moderator: Moderators
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Scientific Justification for Free Will?
Post #1[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]
Post #311
This is an excellent question which would seem to merit it's own thread. I'm writing the opening post for such a thread now, will provide a link to new thread here shortly.What makes you suspect that? It seems to me that either an intelligent designer exists or doesn't exist.
Post #312
.
I have a billion euros but unfortunately it is not tracked by any bank or contract or paper and ink or any metal or anything at all, people tell me that it does not exist but I know better.
In the same way, an electron that is not tracked at all does not exist.
I was using the term absurd in the scope of logic, Reductio ad absurdum, not the popular parlance of weird or strange.keithprosser3 wrote:If you don't see a reason to think that the behavior of electrons is weird you are probably in a minority. Weird ideas can become acceptable through familiarity, but they are still weird.olavisjo wrote:I see no reason to think any of those things are absurd, I may think that some of those things are not true but it is not because they are absurd.
JBS Haldane - no fool - said "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine."
We both know that the answer isn't nothing.keithprosser3 wrote: I always wonder when people worry about things like the first cause. If a theist asks me 'well, what caused the big bang?' I tell them I haven't the foggiest idea. Being an atheist doesn't mean knowing all the answers - it means knowing what the answer isn't. I think even atheists forget that sometimes.
Information that is not tracked at all, does not exist.keithprosser3 wrote: On the information issue, I don't see why things have to be 'tracked' at all...
I have a billion euros but unfortunately it is not tracked by any bank or contract or paper and ink or any metal or anything at all, people tell me that it does not exist but I know better.
In the same way, an electron that is not tracked at all does not exist.
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
Post #314
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
Post #315
Yes well actually I asked YOU to define nothing. You still haven't but you have used a definition of something the dictionary calls nothing. Yes?
Post #316
.
Definition of
I am sorry, but you are right, I did give the definition of something. Let me try again...10CC wrote:Yes well actually I asked YOU to define nothing. You still haven't but you have used a definition of something the dictionary calls nothing. Yes?
Definition of
"I believe in no religion. There is absolutely no proof for any of them, and from a philosophical standpoint Christianity is not even the best. All religions, that is, all mythologies to give them their proper name, are merely man’s own invention..."
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
Post #317
What? I didn't hear you. Oh that's right there is not anything that is nothing. Damn that blows all of the theists arguments out of the non nothing that existed before existence, doesn't it? Oh well they've been making stuff up for a long time, I'm sure they can start again.
Post #318
Or perhaps this would just support their arguments. If there is no such thing as nothing, then there had to be something that caused the universe to existence.10CC wrote:What? I didn't hear you. Oh that's right there is not anything that is nothing. Damn that blows all of the theists arguments out of the non nothing that existed before existence, doesn't it? Oh well they've been making stuff up for a long time, I'm sure they can start again.
Post #319
What was before the universe? And what caused it to exist?instantc wrote:Or perhaps this would just support their arguments. If there is no such thing as nothing, then there had to be something that caused the universe to existence.10CC wrote:What? I didn't hear you. Oh that's right there is not anything that is nothing. Damn that blows all of the theists arguments out of the non nothing that existed before existence, doesn't it? Oh well they've been making stuff up for a long time, I'm sure they can start again.
Post #320
My point is, your claim that 'nothing' is an incoherent concept supports Olavisjo's claim that it wasn't nothing that caused the universe to exist. I'm not saying it does anything to prove God.10CC wrote:What was before the universe? And what caused it to exist?instantc wrote:Or perhaps this would just support their arguments. If there is no such thing as nothing, then there had to be something that caused the universe to existence.10CC wrote:What? I didn't hear you. Oh that's right there is not anything that is nothing. Damn that blows all of the theists arguments out of the non nothing that existed before existence, doesn't it? Oh well they've been making stuff up for a long time, I'm sure they can start again.