Questions for Putting Our Heads Together:
Which is more effective?:
1. Creating a movement that positively leads to, and supports, the desired result.
OR
2. Creating a movement that opposes and/or protests against things that appear to be blocking a desired result.
~~~~~
Also, Is it even possible to accomplish #1 without necessarily appealing to, or employing #2?
Leading or Opposing, which is more Effective?
Moderator: Moderators
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #2
I voted 1, for one reason. Its obvious the most effective way would be to do both. But if I had to choose one, the most effective IMO is number 1. An optimist is better than a pessimist.
But is it possible to do one without the other?
The world may never know....
But is it possible to do one without the other?
The world may never know....
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Nilloc James
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Canada
Post #3
Some of the most successful movements have employed either or both. I dont know if either is objectively better, but it may all depend on context.