An intelligently designed legal attack is exposing the soft underbelly of neo-Darwinist facism in public education.
Fascinating details emerging from the court transcripts of the historic Evo/ID legal battle in PA.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/k ... dover.html
Kitzmiller vs. Dover, PA
Moderator: Moderators
Post #101
Incorrect.snappyanswer wrote:This "non-activist" Judge also laid down the guantlet; that if any Christrians dare to come after evolution again, they had better have a lot of money for the cost of going after this unchalllengeable icon worshipped by the "scientific" community of the modern world.
The implication of the ruling is that if creationists want to come after evolution, they actually have to be honest, and they actually have to have some evidence and logical arguments to support their case.
As has amply been demonstrated by the creationist responses over the previous page, creationists have no evidence to refute evolution, and their arguments are utterly deficient in logic. This is what the judge found.
Engaging in ad hominem attacks against the judge, the public school system, and those Christians and others who actually understand what evolution is, that the evidence supports evolution, and that it is not in the least bit inconsistent with belief in God or a Creator, is not going to help the case for creationism or ID.
Post #102
Christians of all denominations couldn't be accused of intellectuall dishonesty if they honestly thought that the government was being racist and fascist by teaching neo-Darwinist racial theories of human origins in Africa which claim scientific superiority over the beliefs of other Americans concerning their racial origins and ancestry. Neither could they subsequently be accused of intellectual dishonesty when they file class action civil rights lawsuits against their respective governmental school boards which impose the racial fascism inherent in all neo-Darwinist theories of human evolution from non-human or less-than-human species in Africa.micatala wrote:Incorrect.snappyanswer wrote:This "non-activist" Judge also laid down the guantlet; that if any Christrians dare to come after evolution again, they had better have a lot of money for the cost of going after this unchalllengeable icon worshipped by the "scientific" community of the modern world.
The implication of the ruling is that if creationists want to come after evolution, they actually have to be honest, and they actually have to have some evidence and logical arguments to support their case.
Neither will ad hominem attacks on Christians who believe that forcing neo-Darwinist racial theories of human evolution on American students in public schools is a form of biological fascism on the part of state governments, help neo-Darwinists maintain the illusion that their theories are very scientific after all, but should be regarded by the public as pseudo-scientific religious forms of humanistic beliefs about human origins which many Christians in public school systems seem to have no problem believing in religiously while teaching neo-Darwinist race theories of human descent from monkey and ape ancestors under the guise of real science.Engaging in ad hominem attacks against the judge, the public school system, and those Christians and others who actually understand what evolution is, that the evidence supports evolution, and that it is not in the least bit inconsistent with belief in God or a Creator, is not going to help the case for creationism or ID.
-
snappyanswer
- Student
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Post #103
I wish. Reality is all too uncomfortable. The following was not written by an anti-Christ like dawkins but by a man of the cloth sickened in his mind and spirit by evolution.Quote:
But as is also the case it is Christians that are in the center of the cross hairs.
Steen wrote:
More nonsense, only exposing your paranoia.
The Jesus who "died for our sins" has simply got to go in our post-Darwinian world. Christianity must move beyond a rescuing Jesus, who overcame a fall that never happened, even metaphorically, to restore human life to a status it has never had, even mythologically. Williams' task is nothing less than to articulate a new Christianity for a new world.
Some people can shove their heads into the sand but we that have our rational minds still unwashed away by Darwin's theory can see cause and effect.
Hitting the ignore button on reality cannnot stop the evil breeding itself in our Darwinistic schools.
Post #104
Ooo, snappyanswer, my father used to call me a whippersnapper every time I snapped an answer back at him. Welcome to the forum and clash of civilizations where the authoritarian voice of autonomous sinful man competes with the authoritative Word of God!snappyanswer wrote:Hitting the ignore button on reality cannnot stop the evil breeding itself in our Darwinistic schools.
