Human Evolution

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Jose
Guru
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Indiana

Human Evolution

Post #1

Post by Jose »

jcrawford and I have been having some interesting discussions in other threads, which have led to the notion that we really need a thread on human evolution. So, here it is.

The Rules
We want to work from data. Data that is discussed must be accessible in the scientific literature. Personally, I would prefer the peer-reviewed literature, because, as those of us in science know all too well, the peer reviewers are usually one's competitors. Thus, they are typically extremely critical of what we write.

Any other information that is brought to bear must also be accessible to everyone. Where requested, direct quotes from the sources will be important.

The questions for discussion

1. What is the current best understanding of human origins?

2. What "confounds" are there in the interpretation of data?

3. Given that there is always genetic diversity within populations, how easily can we assign hominid fossils to different groups?
Here, the term "form-species" is probably most useful, referring to similar fossils with similar forms, but in the absence of information on the capacity for interbreeding. In many cases, different form-species are different species (fossil trees vs fossil insects), but sometimes they are not (fossil leaves vs fossil roots of the same tree).

4. Does information based on fossil data mesh with information based on genetic data? The true history must be genetically feasible. The fossils must have been left by individuals who were produced by normal genetic methods. To be valid, any explanation of origins must incorporate both fossil and genetic data.

5. What are the parts of human history that are most at odds with (some) Christian views, and what suggestions can we offer for reaching a reconciliation?

I will begin by posting the following genetic data, which is pictorial representation of the differences and similarities in mitochondrial DNA sequence of a whole bunch of people. Relative difference/similarity is proportional to the lengths of the vertical lines. Horizontal lines merely separate the vertical lines so we can see them.
Image
How do we interpret these data?

[If appropriate, I will edit this post to ensure that the OP of this thread lists the important questions.
Panza llena, corazon contento

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #221

Post by McCulloch »

jcrawford wrote: You remind me of the teacher in the following cartoon.
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0055/0055_01.asp
Is there any evidence that this kind of thing happens, or has happened? Or is it just wishful thinking on the part of creationists? Who here will give it a go? I am sure there are university classrooms just waiting to be enlightened.
No, wait, just prove it to the debaters here. Yeah, that's it!
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
MagusYanam
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Providence, RI (East Side)

Post #222

Post by MagusYanam »

Heh. This cartoon is chock-full of straw men and leaps of logic, so I don't know where to begin but with an anecdote. We've had some creationists in our college classrooms and we debated evolution and special creation, quite civilly, in our Logic and Reasoning class. We treated the creationist argument with the full logical charity it was due and didn't try to shout them down the way the fictional university professor and students did. Also, the author seems to be drawing a false dichotomy between academics and the religious. I happen to be both a student with academic leanings and a religious man.

I can hardly say that the arguments either in the cartoon or by the creationists in our L&R class come anywhere near to convincing me that biological evolution is a 'big lie'. The theory of biological evolution (the only one I ever learned in the biology classroom) is observable beyond doubt. Most creationists now accept it under the misnomer of 'micro-evolution'. What creationists are actually trying to attack (and failing miserably) is a mixture of conclusions from a range of disciplines including physics (radioactive decay), geology (plate tectonics and materials science) and palaeontology (the fossil record).

User avatar
Grumpy
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:58 am
Location: North Carolina

Post #223

Post by Grumpy »

All

I recieved a PM that JC is trying to claim that Hitler's insanity was caused by Darwin's truths. Just to put the record straight I present these sincere Christian thoughts of the gentleman in question and the thoughts of the father of all Protestant sects, Martin Luther.

In the spirit of truth I must first say that I recongnize the misuse of religion practiced by Hitler and Luther and that their views do not represent the mainstream, just as the racist views of some accepters of evolution should be recognized as the misuse of that science. I am sorry to have to use the following filth to defend the truth, but JC's delusions need dispelling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First let me quote Martin Luther on his view of what to do with the Jews in Germany.

Dr. Martin Luther (1483-1546)

Accordingly, it must and dare not be considered a trifling matter but a most serious one to seek counsel against this and to save our souls from the Jews, that is, from the devil and from eternal death. My advice, as I said earlier, is:

First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire...

Second, that all their books-- their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-- be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted...

Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country...

Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it...

-Martin Luther (On the Jews and Their Lies)


Luther not only wrote 'On the Jews and their lies,' but also dubious and intolerant works such as 'Against the Sabbatarians', 'Against the Antinoman,' and 'Against the Robbing and Murdering Hordes of Peasants.' In the latter, Luther called for the stabbing and slaying of peasant rebels which triggered the death of an estimated 100,000 human beings. These rebels were not only Christians but were mostly slaughtered after their surrender to the German princes. Nor did Luther apologize for his treatise even after world criticism. In his response to his critics in "An Open Letter on the Harsh Book," Luther reiterated his venom: "Therefore, as I wrote then so I write now; Let no one have mercy on the obstinate, hardened, blinded peasants who refuse to listen to reason; but let everyone, as he is able, strike, hew, stab, and slay, as though among mad dogs, put to flight, and led astray by these peasants, so that peace and safety may be maintained." In all these harsh treatises, Luther provided an abundance of Biblical passages to justify his attack on his enemies. And, or course (sarcastically speaking), his actions were always through Christian "love" of his enemies, as he audaciously wrote: "The merciless punishment of the wicked is not being carried out just to punish the wicked and make them atone for the evil desires that are in their blood, but to protect the righteous and to maintain peace and safety. And beyond all doubt, these are precious works of mercy, love, and kindness. . ." [Bold characters, mine].

More at:

http://www.nobeliefs.com/luther.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what did the German people think(at least as expressed by leaders) about such thought?

Walter Buch, the head of the Nazi Party court, admitted Luther's influence on Nazi Germany:

When Luther turned his attention to the Jews, after he completed his translation of the Bible, he left behind "on the Jews and their Lies" for posterity.
-cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]

Many people confess their amazement that Hitler preaches ideas which they have always held.... From the Middle Ages we can look to the same example in Martin Luther. What stirred in the soul and spirit of the German people of that time, finally found expression in his person, in his words and deeds.
-"Geist und Kampf" (speech), Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]


Hans Hinkel, a Nazi who worked in Goebbels' Reich Chamber of Culture said:

Through his acts and his spiritual attitude he began the fight which we still wage today; with Luther the revolution of German blood and feeling against alien elements of the Volk was begun.
-cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich


Erich Koch, the Reich Commissioner for Ukraine and President of the East Prussian Protestant Church Synod wrote:

Only we can enter into Luther's spirit.... Human cults do not set us free from all sin, but faith alone. With us the church shall become a serving member of the state.... There is a deep sense that our celebration is not attended by superficiality, but rather by thanks to a man who saved German cultural values.
-Konigsberg-Hartungsche Zeitung, 20 Nov. 1933, [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]


Bernhard Rust served as Minister of Education in Nazi Germany. He wrote:

Since Martin Luther closed his eyes, no such son of our people has appeared again. It has been decided that we shall be the first to witness his reappearance.... I think the time is past when one may not say the names of Hitler and Luther in the same breath. They belong together; they are of the same old stamp [Schrot und Korn].
-Volkischer Beobachter, 25 Aug. 1933, [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]


Hans Schemm became Bavarian Minister of Education and Culture. Throughout the Reich, Germans particularly knew Schemm for his slogan, "Our religion is Christ, our politics Fatherland!" He writes:

His engagement against the decomposing Jewish spirit is clearly evident not only from his writing against the Jews; his life too was idealistically, philosophically antisemitic. Now we Germans of today have the duty to recognize and acknowledge this.
-"Luther und das Deutschtum," Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf (19 Nov. 1933: Berlin), [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]

Our confession to God is a confession of a doctrine of totality.... To give ultimate significance to the totalities of race, resistance and personality there is added the supreme totalitarian slogan of our Volk: "Religion and God." God is the greatest totality and extends over all else.
-(Gertrud Kahl-Furthmann (ed.), Hans Schemm spricht: Seine Reden und sein Werk (Bayreuth, 1935), [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]

Julius Streicher (one of Hitler's top henchmen and publisher of the anti-Semitic Der Sturmer) was asked during the Nuremberg trials if there were any other publications in Germany which treated the Jewish question in an anti-Semitic way., Streicher put it well:

"Dr. Martin Luther would very probably sit in my place in the defendants' dock today, if this book had been taken into consideration by the Prosecution. In the book 'The Jews and Their Lies,' Dr. Martin Luther writes that the Jews are a serpent's brood and one should burn down their synagogues and destroy them..."


Indeed, no historian has yet to put Martin Luther on trial for his incitement of crimes against humanity.

Today, white-supremacists and Neo-Nazis continue to spread Luther's Jewish hatred and use quotes from this book as "proof" of their convictions. I trust that readers will see the horror and danger of Luther's book and will realize the potential threat that might come from belief in its words.

http://www.nobeliefs.com/luther.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in Hitler's own words, the justification of his hatred of the Jews.

My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.... When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom to-day this poor people is plundered and exploited.
-Adolf Hitler, in his speech on 12 April 1922

http://www.nobeliefs.com/speeches.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is much more of this filth available for quoting but I think I have provided more than enough evidence that the misuse of an idea can happen on both sides of the creation/evolution arguement. I think it is way past time for JC to stop misuseing the twisted views of the few to smear the majority of evolution proponents before I find it necessary to post more of Hitler and other "Christian's" views in response. People in glass houses should refrain from throwing stones.

Pardon me now, I must go take a long shower.

Grumpy 8)

jcrawford
Guru
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:49 pm

Post #224

Post by jcrawford »

Grumpy wrote:There is much more of this filth available for quoting but I think I have provided more than enough evidence that the misuse of an idea can happen on both sides of the creation/evolution arguement. I think it is way past time for JC to stop misuseing the twisted views of the few to smear the majority of evolution proponents before I find it necessary to post more of Hitler and other "Christian's" views in response. People in glass houses should refrain from throwing stones.

Pardon me now, I must go take a long shower.

Grumpy 8)
Why quote and post "more of this filth" when it has nothing to do with me or current neo-Darwinist racial theories of human evolution in Africa, and only causes you to take a "long shower?"

Post Reply