Is Buddhism logical?

Argue for and against religions and philosophies which are not Christian

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Is Buddhism logical?

Post #1

Post by cholland »

"The Buddha described Nirvana as the perfect peace of the state of mind that is free from craving, anger and other afflictive states (kilesas)." -Wikipedia

Wouldn't Nirvana in itself be a craving?

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #2

Post by Goat »

cholland wrote:"The Buddha described Nirvana as the perfect peace of the state of mind that is free from craving, anger and other afflictive states (kilesas)." -Wikipedia

Wouldn't Nirvana in itself be a craving?
No.. but desiring Nirvana would be.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #3

Post by cholland »

goat wrote:No.. but desiring Nirvana would be.
Yah, I guess that's what I meant. Is that not illogical? You must have a craving to rid yourself of cravings.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #4

Post by Goat »

cholland wrote:
goat wrote:No.. but desiring Nirvana would be.
Yah, I guess that's what I meant. Is that not illogical? You must have a craving to rid yourself of cravings.
That's why so few people have reached "enlightenment"

When someone is well on the way to achieve that, they can suddenly look at themself and say 'Pretty good', and the good old "PRIDE" issue comes up and slaps them in the back.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #5

Post by cholland »

goat wrote:That's why so few people have reached "enlightenment"

When someone is well on the way to achieve that, they can suddenly look at themself and say 'Pretty good', and the good old "PRIDE" issue comes up and slaps them in the back.
But I'm arguing that NO ONE can reach Nirvana because it's illogical. Nirvana is to have no desires, yet you have to desire Nirvana in order to get there.

Keep in mind, though, that I know little about Buddhism so this is simply for my knowledge.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #6

Post by Goat »

cholland wrote:
goat wrote:That's why so few people have reached "enlightenment"

When someone is well on the way to achieve that, they can suddenly look at themself and say 'Pretty good', and the good old "PRIDE" issue comes up and slaps them in the back.
But I'm arguing that NO ONE can reach Nirvana because it's illogical. Nirvana is to have no desires, yet you have to desire Nirvana in order to get there.

Keep in mind, though, that I know little about Buddhism so this is simply for my knowledge.
I don't know if anybody can read 'nirvanah or not'.. never having met someone who was truly enlightened.

I don't know if anybody can be 'saved' or not either.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #7

Post by cholland »

goat wrote:I don't know if anybody can read 'nirvanah or not'.. never having met someone who was truly enlightened.

I don't know if anybody can be 'saved' or not either.
I'm not talking about specific people. I'm talking about the logic behind it.

And I'm not talking about Christianity either.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #8

Post by Goat »

cholland wrote:
goat wrote:I don't know if anybody can read 'nirvanah or not'.. never having met someone who was truly enlightened.

I don't know if anybody can be 'saved' or not either.
I'm not talking about specific people. I'm talking about the logic behind it.

And I'm not talking about Christianity either.
Logic of religious claims often escapes me.. and one should not throw stones when one lives in a glass house.

The logic behind removing all desires is as logical as the reasoning behind the concept of 'salvation'.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: Is Buddhism logical?

Post #9

Post by cholland »

goat wrote:Logic of religious claims often escapes me.. and one should not throw stones when one lives in a glass house.

The logic behind removing all desires is as logical as the reasoning behind the concept of 'salvation'.
Sooooo, it is or isn't? Maybe I should wait for a Buddhist.

User avatar
naturalist griggsy
Student
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Location: Augusta, Ga.
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

?

Post #10

Post by naturalist griggsy »

I understand that Buddha encouraged skepticism, disregarding faith. I know that some find him a humanist.
To that extent , one can find him better than Yeshua [Issa], but karma and reincarnation rank as nonsense.
Buddhims qualifies as an atheistic religion, albeit a former Pm. of Japan said it has many gods. What is the latest information on that? :)

Post Reply