Is the Qu'ran self-evidently true?

McCulloch · Post by **McCulloch** » Sat May 03, 2008 10:29 am

paarsurrey wrote:Quran is self-evident, yes very truly.

Is the Qu'ran self-evidently true?

Wyvern · Post by **Wyvern** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:42 pm

Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,

You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.

TrueReligion · Post by **TrueReligion** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:54 pm

Wyvern wrote:
Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,
You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.

What are the refutations? tell me,
But what about you? never answer any of my questions as well, so is it fair?

Wyvern · Post by **Wyvern** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:56 pm

TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,
You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.
What are the refutations? tell me,
But what about you? never answer any of my questions as well, so is it fair?

Refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god. Please stay on topic.

TrueReligion · Post by **TrueReligion** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:03 pm

Wyvern wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,
You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.
What are the refutations? tell me,
But what about you? never answer any of my questions as well, so is it fair?
Refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god. Please stay on topic.

I'am on topic, and I replied already to proof of God, but in answer to that, you have'nt told me yet, if you believe in God or no?

Wyvern · Post by **Wyvern** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:26 pm

TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,
You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.
What are the refutations? tell me,
But what about you? never answer any of my questions as well, so is it fair?
Refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god. Please stay on topic.
I'am on topic, and I replied already to proof of God, but in answer to that, you have'nt told me yet, if you believe in God or no?

I have stated many times now you will get your answer of my thoughts on god once you can provide a medical website that states that leeches and embryos have alot in common.
Please refer to posts 175-177 for the refutations to your proof of god.

TrueReligion · Post by **TrueReligion** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:44 pm

Wyvern wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
Its your opinion again, I dont do debate here for winning or loosing, I bring evidence, which unfortunatly you never bring. and my evidence is perfect and authentic.
Now as you never brought your proof, and didnt showed any evidence to make my claim false, the defeat is morelikely to be yours. admit it Wyvern, you can;t bring anything to make it wrong,
You have not responded to the refutations already given, please do so.
What are the refutations? tell me,
But what about you? never answer any of my questions as well, so is it fair?
Refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god. Please stay on topic.
I'am on topic, and I replied already to proof of God, but in answer to that, you have'nt told me yet, if you believe in God or no?
I have stated many times now you will get your answer of my thoughts on god once you can provide a medical website that states that leeches and embryos have alot in common.
Please refer to posts 175-177 for the refutations to your proof of god.

We are not talking about leech and embryo here, please stay on topic and answer me clearly if you believe in God or no?

Wyvern · Post by **Wyvern** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:52 pm

We are not talking about leech and embryo here, please stay on topic and answer me clearly if you believe in God or no?

You have been given my conditions for recieving my answer on the nature of god, fulfill it or not is your choice.

Please refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god and respond to them to continue this conversation.

TrueReligion · Post by **TrueReligion** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:10 pm

Wyvern wrote:
We are not talking about leech and embryo here, please stay on topic and answer me clearly if you believe in God or no?
You have been given my conditions for recieving my answer on the nature of god, fulfill it or not is your choice.

Please refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god and respond to them to continue this conversation.

I gave you already my answer for proof of God in simple lines and words, now you have to give your answer to continue this conversation.

Refer to my pos 174 for answer.

Wyvern · Post by **Wyvern** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:14 pm

TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
We are not talking about leech and embryo here, please stay on topic and answer me clearly if you believe in God or no?
You have been given my conditions for recieving my answer on the nature of god, fulfill it or not is your choice.

Please refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god and respond to them to continue this conversation.
I gave you already my answer for proof of God in simple lines and words, now you have to give your answer to continue this conversation.

Refer to my pos 174 for answer.

Yes and it has been refuted in posts 175-177. Please respond to them to continue this conversation

TrueReligion · Post by **TrueReligion** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:22 pm

Wyvern wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
We are not talking about leech and embryo here, please stay on topic and answer me clearly if you believe in God or no?
You have been given my conditions for recieving my answer on the nature of god, fulfill it or not is your choice.

Please refer to posts 175-177 for refutations to your proof of god and respond to them to continue this conversation.
I gave you already my answer for proof of God in simple lines and words, now you have to give your answer to continue this conversation.

Refer to my pos 174 for answer.
Yes and it has been refuted in posts 175-177. Please respond to them to continue this conversation

post 174 comes 1st, you have to answer it 1st to continue for other question and answers, please follow the debate