Mirza Qadiani: drug addict, alcoholic

[Ilias Ahmad]

Verily, all praise belongs to Allah alone, the Lord of the worlds

I would like to pose this challenge to the single Qadiani (Truth Teller) who is active on this forum. It is very necessary to expose this person and prove to all that he does not represent Islam, but rather belongs to a pseudo-"Islamic" cult known as Ahmadiyyah, which has been declared a non-Muslim religion by the government of Pakistan since 1974, and by numerous high courts of various countries throughout the world.

The Ahmadiyyah (Qadiani) religion was started by a fake prophet, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (1835?-1908). He was a proven (1) drug addict, (2) alcoholic, (3) suffered from hypochondria, (4) suffered from tuberculosis, (5) suffered from severe diabetes, and (6) died from cholera. Some people regard him as a prophet and messiah, but actually he was a clown under constant divine punishment as evidenced by his suffering of numerous diseases.

Mirza used to urinate 100 times on daily basis

He wrote: "I remember an incident and which is that I have diabetes for several years. I urinate 15-20 times daily and sometimes I urinate 100 times per day." (Naseem Daawat, Roohani Khazain vol.19 p.434-435)

Imagine, this person suffered from such severe diabetes he is constantly urinating, sometimes 100 times within 24 hours!!! What a heavenly curse!

Mirza drank Tonic Wine (haram)

O ye who believe! Wine and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination, of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper (Holy Quran 5:90)

Every believing Muslim, rich or poor, must abide by the commands of the Holy Quran. The Prophets are the most righteous category of humanity. Mirza claimed to be a prophet, yet he did not possess an iota of righteousness, but indulged in all manner of haram (sinful) things. The following is a letter which Mirza wrote to one of his disciples:

"My Beloved Hakeem Muhammad Hussein Sahib, Assalamo alaikum wa Rehmatullah wa Barakatuhu. Presently I am sending Mian Yar Mohammad. Purchase yourself all the things that are to be purchased and buy one bottle of tonic wine from the Plommer Shop. But I want tonic wine, make a note of it. Rest is fine. Wassalam." (signed) Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.

(Letters of Imam towards Ghulam, p.5, Majmooa-e-Maktoobat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad towards Hakeem Muhammad Hussain Qureishi)

Mirza was a drug addict

"Hazrat Maseeh Mowood (referring to Mirza Qadiani) prepared a medicine 'tiryaq-e-illahi' under instructions from God and one of the main ingredient was opium and Huzoor (Mirza) gave this medicine, with a little more addition of Opium, to Hazrat Khalifa Awwal (Maulvi Nuruddin) for more than six months and off and on used himself as well during the attacks of various illnesses." (Al-Fazl newspaper vol.17 No.6 p.2 dated 19th July 1929)

Question to Truth Teller: Is this the man whom you regard as a Prophet?

[Truth_Teller]

"All the windows of prophethood have been closed, but one window, that of the path of Siddiq, is open"

What does that line say? A "Siddiq" means truthful one. It doesn´t mean a Prophet.

You can´t just pick and choose lines out of the book, it´s better to read the entire book.

At the end of it he (Mirza Sahib) wrote:

"Now by all of this writing, I mean to say that ignorant opponents accuse me of claiming to be a prophet and messenger. I make no such claim. I am neither a prophet nor a messenger in the sense which they have in mind. However, I am a prophet and a messenger in the sense which I have just explained. Hence the person who maliciously accuses me of claiming prophethood and messengership is a liar and evil-minded. It is the form of burooz which has made me a prophet and a messenger, and it is on this basis that God has called me nabi and rasul again and again, but in the sense of burooz. My own self does not come into it, but that of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, may peace and the blessings of God be upon him. It was on this account that I was called "Muhammad" and "Ahmad". So prophethood and messengership did not go to another person. What belonged to Muhammad remained with Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him."

We Muslims do believe that the Promised Messiah (Jesus) is definitely a Prophet of God, and this status of being a prophet can never be taken away from him, even when he comes back to this world. The difference is that Jesus came some 600 years before Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa salam), so his second coming in the latter days does not alter Muhammad's (sallallahu alaihi wa salam) status as Khatam an-Nabiyeen (Seal of Prophets).

Now, if Mirza Ghulam Ahmed really claimed Prophethood then on what basis did he lay down the argument of The Holy Verse which says "Muhammad is Seal of Prophets" to prove the death of Jesus Christ???

However, Mirza Qadiani was born centuries after Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa salam) passed away. Therefore, if Mirza is the Promised Messiah prophesied in the authentic ahadeeth, than this would definitely break Prophet Muhammad's (sallallahu alaihi wa salam) exalted status of Khatam an-Nabiyeen.

His argument was exactly the same to prove the death of Jesus Christ. He always argued that, "Won´t The Seal be broken???"

He claimed Prophethood and Messengership only in a metaphorical sense having been called one in a Divine Revelation.

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa salam) is the last prophet only in the sense that he is the last person to be given nabuwwat chronologically. It doesn't mean he is the last prophet to die, why can't Qadianis understand this?

You are contradicting it all here, mate. Isn´t there also a Hadith which says that "Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was given Prophethood before all other Prophets". Does it mean that all those who came before him were false one since they were handed The Prophethood after Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him)???

Sorry for te delayed reply. I have been busy all these days.

Peace.

From your fellow Muslim.

[Ilias Ahmad]

Now by all of this writing, I mean to say that ignorant opponents accuse me of claiming to be a prophet and messenger. I make no such claim. I am neither a prophet nor a messenger in the sense which they have in mind. However, I am a prophet and a messenger in the sense which I have just explained.

I don't care what sense of prophethood Mirza claimed, all prophethood in any sense of the word has ceased with the advent of the last and final prophet, the king of Madinah, Muhammad Mustafa (sallallahu alaihi wa salam). Prophethood of any sense, including non-law bearing prophethood, dependent prophethood, and saintly prophethood, etc., all forms of prophethood have been terminated. Even if Mirza were to say "I am just a prophet because Allah called me this in a revelation, so I am just a prophet as a useless title" even this is manifest disbelief.

But the reality is Mirza claimed to be superior than Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa salam)!!!

The entity of the promised messiah (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the holy prophet (Muhammad). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised messiah (Mirza) and the holy prophet (Muhammad). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, no.37)

The person who makes a difference between me (Mirza) and Mustafa (Muhammad) has neither seen me nor recognized me". (Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, p.171; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.258-259)

In fact, Mirza Qadiani was the one who tried to steal our Prophet's rank as the last prophet:

"Blessed is he who has recognized me. Of all the paths to God I am the last path, and of all his lights, I am the last light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness". (Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56; Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61)

So you see the insolence of Mirza as he reveals his true colors. His followers to this day claim that he was just a saint and a reformer, and he was subservient to the last and final prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa salam). But a close examination of his writings reveal that he truly was a wicked devil and he had the audacity to claim superiority to all the prophets, including Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa salam):

[center]إ�نَّ الرّ�سَالَةَ وَالنّ�ب�وَّةَ قَد� انْقَطَعَتْ �َلَا رَس�ولَ بَعْد�ي وَلَا نَب�ي[/center]
[center]Verily, messengerhood and prophethood have been terminated, so there will be no messenger after me, nor a prophet.[/center]
[center](Sunan Tirmidhi)[/center]

[Truth_Teller]

I don't care what sense of prophethood Mirza claimed, all prophethood in any sense of the word has ceased with the advent of the last and final prophet, the king of Madinah, Muhammad Mustafa (sallallahu alaihi wa salam). Prophethood of any sense, including non-law bearing prophethood, dependent prophethood, and saintly prophethood, etc., all forms of prophethood have been terminated. Even if Mirza were to say "I am just a prophet because Allah called me this in a revelation, so I am just a prophet as a useless title" even this is manifest disbelief.

Amazing! Now since Mirza Sahib has claimed Prophethood and Messengership in a metaphorical sense he has committed heresy?!!! Remember your own thread where you explained that Jesus used the word "Father" only in a sense of metaphore? Does that mean even he was just taking a shield?

But the reality is Mirza claimed to be superior than Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa salam)!!!

The entity of the promised messiah (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the holy prophet (Muhammad). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised messiah (Mirza) and the holy prophet (Muhammad). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, no.37)

The person who makes a difference between me (Mirza) and Mustafa (Muhammad) has neither seen me nor recognized me". (Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, p.171; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.258-259)

In fact, Mirza Qadiani was the one who tried to steal our Prophet's rank as the last prophet:

"Blessed is he who has recognized me. Of all the paths to God I am the last path, and of all his lights, I am the last light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness". (Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56; Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61).

He might have said in this because since he wasn´t a Prophet but just a mere manifestation and the one spritually.