What is right? What is wrong?

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
JamesWesley
Apprentice
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: Virginia, United States

What is right? What is wrong?

Post #1

Post by JamesWesley »

How do we define "right"?


How do we define what is "wrong"?
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." ~ Thomas Jefferson

TheParticlePerson
Scholar
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:46 pm

Post #2

Post by TheParticlePerson »

Who cares?

User avatar
JamesWesley
Apprentice
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: Virginia, United States

Post #3

Post by JamesWesley »

I do.

Why would you bother posting if you don't care?

TheParticlePerson
Scholar
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:46 pm

Post #4

Post by TheParticlePerson »

My apathy is a legitimate philosophy. What do you mean how do we define what is right and wrong? Do you mean how should we? The answer to either question can never be an objective one, rendering the topic useless. There is no right or wrong, only events and humans interpreting them.

User avatar
Sir Rhetor
Apprentice
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:57 pm
Location: The Fourth Spacial Dimension

Post #5

Post by Sir Rhetor »

I'm just going to give you my opinion, but here goes.

Right is what is beneficial to your moral scope. So, if your moral scope is all humans, you wouldn't mind cutting down rain forests to give people new places to live. If your moral scope is all of life on earth, then killing a planet of aliens to save an ant would not bother you.

Wrong is what is detrimental to your moral scope; it is the opposite of right.

Let us be sure in understanding that only acts can be "right" or "wrong". People commit acts, and only their acts can be judged with a morality value. Atomic bombs are not "good" or "evil" per say; they have the potential to be used for both.

The thing I like most about my definition is that the moral scope is up to you. But generally those with a wider moral scope are seen by others as more virtuous.

sickpeacer
Student
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:33 am

Post #6

Post by sickpeacer »

my opinion right side and wrong side(+/-), Positive had a negative side and Negative had positive side too. It means that Positive couldn’t life without Negative. For example, try to see generator (electric source). It couldn’t work if positive side consist in rotor/stator only. It need negative side. Earth couldn’t rotate if consist positive side only. Who created that? God Him/His self. Who created positive and negative side in human think, act and relationship? Evil It self but it had an authorized from God. So, why there are always differences? It created from the beginning! Since human fall. Since eve follows snake instruction. That’s why in my country they always said, woman is poison of the world, snake? – joke.
In the other word as a human, wrong happen because you never make right things or you never understand what the meaning of LOVE.

Regards,
sickpeacer
http://sickpeacer.tk

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #7

Post by JoeyKnothead »

Right:
That side of your body with the hand you don't traditionally put a wedding ring on.

Wrong:
Putting a wedding ring on :)

Really though, philosophically, right and wrong are a reflection of the individual, and society's moral or other values. They can be as far apart as day and night, and as close together as two fingers on the same hand.

User avatar
Slopeshoulder
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:46 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post #8

Post by Slopeshoulder »

TheParticlePerson wrote:There is no right or wrong, only events and humans interpreting them.
How do we "interpret" the rightness and wrongness of events of willful action, and is there an alternative to nihilism? Are events and acts the same? Are interpreatations themselves acts or events? Are ethics possible? What is the source, foundation, or structure of our interpretation? Is it political, socio-biological, self-delusional, or is there meaning to the words right and wrong (ideal, real, pragmatic), and can this meaning be shared in discourse and community? Do human events differ from particle events? ParticlePerson, are we persons, particles, or both?
I can't get to a definition until you clarify.

sineporf
Student
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:48 pm

heh

Post #9

Post by sineporf »

right and wrong, in the grand scheme of things, is a crock of dookie. If we dropped the nuke on society and everything went back to the way it was (without the nuclear fall out plus the flora and fauna), we would come to order and chaos

nancyd
Student
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:41 pm
Location: chicago

Post #10

Post by nancyd »

Slopeshoulder wrote:
TheParticlePerson wrote:There is no right or wrong, only events and humans interpreting them.
How do we "interpret" the rightness and wrongness of events of willful action, and is there an alternative to nihilism? Are events and acts the same? Are interpreatations themselves acts or events? Are ethics possible? What is the source, foundation, or structure of our interpretation? Is it political, socio-biological, self-delusional, or is there meaning to the words right and wrong (ideal, real, pragmatic), and can this meaning be shared in discourse and community? Do human events differ from particle events? ParticlePerson, are we persons, particles, or both?
I can't get to a definition until you clarify.
I agree that point of view and context have everything to do with "right" or "wrong"
However there are some things that are just wrong under any circumstance.For instance: raping an infant. Perhaps there is a alternate universe where this is the norm but my assumption would be we are speaking of this universe.

Post Reply