Would An Intersexual Marriage Be Morally Wrong?

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

Jonah
Scholar
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:32 pm

Would An Intersexual Marriage Be Morally Wrong?

Post #1

Post by Jonah »

For those who believe that gay marriage is against God's ways, what about an Intersexual marrying anyone, male or female?

User avatar
Coyotero
Scholar
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: Tempe, Arizona

Post #2

Post by Coyotero »

Intersexual?

User avatar
Scotracer
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Scotland

Post #3

Post by Scotracer »

Do you mean a Man and a Woman getting married? I think the view of that is pretty clear...
Why Evolution is True
Universe from nothing

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
- Christopher Hitchens

Jonah
Scholar
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:32 pm

Post #4

Post by Jonah »

Intersexuals are people born with a variety of conditions wherein they have profound attributes of both sexes rendering them of indeterminate sex. Often such people are subjected to surgical and chemical "correction" as children without their consent. Others may escape imposed "correction", but are in the same boat with all intersexuals of being forced into silence and shame and a closet a hundred times worse than homosexuals.

I think everyone gets to say/determine who and what they are and who they can marry. I am assuming that conservative religionists seeking to deny homosexuals the right to marry, would also do the same to intersexuals who either refuse to identify themselves as male or female and/or fail to meet the conservative religionists standard of what male or female is (which they probably have not even thought about).

User avatar
TXatheist
Site Supporter
Posts: 948
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post #5

Post by TXatheist »

Coyotero wrote:Intersexual?
isna.org wrote:Intersex is a general term used for a variety of conditions in which a person is born with a reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesnt seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male. For example, a person might be born appearing to be female on the outside, but having mostly male-typical anatomy on the inside. Or a person may be born with genitals that seem to be in-between the usual male and female types"for example, a girl may be born with a noticeably large clitoris, or lacking a vaginal opening, or a boy may be born with a notably small penis, or with a scrotum that is divided so that it has formed more like labia. Or a person may be born with mosaic genetics, so that some of her cells have XX chromosomes and some of them have XY.
The Texas Atheist: http://www.txatheist.com
Anti-Theism Art: http://anti-theists.deviantart.com

"Atheism is the voice of a few intelligent people." ~ Voltaire

User avatar
Scotracer
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Scotland

Post #6

Post by Scotracer »

Ah, now I get you.

The apologist response to this that I've heard is that because these "issues" were caused by the fall of man then they are not normal and definitely not intended by god. As such you should follow the sexual practices of your "dominant" sex/gender...if that's even possible to figure out.
Why Evolution is True
Universe from nothing

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
- Christopher Hitchens

Jonah
Scholar
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:32 pm

Post #7

Post by Jonah »

My challenge to conservative religionists is then: Shall they strive to be an abiter of just what an intersexual's identity is...and what their marriage rights are apart from whatever the intersexuals themselves say what their identity is and their rights?

Jonah
Scholar
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:32 pm

Post #8

Post by Jonah »

All kinds of problematic questions can be presented to the conservative.

With an intersexual, at what point would a conservative religionists decide they are male enough or female enough to be one or the other? Because there are all kinds of intersexual conditions, the combination of factors can be very complex. Most complex is the interior psychological world of the intersexual. Very few scientific studies have produced very little scientific literature on the subject. Helping professionals therefore, for the most part, avoid this population because there simply is no training, no meaningful scientific corpus of literature to base any professional address of these situations pyschologically.

mpok1519
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:29 pm

Post #9

Post by mpok1519 »

what about hermaphrodiic marriages?

Can I be both a man and a woman who still marries? Can I be extremely androgenous to point even my chromosomes do not conclude beyond a shadow of a doubt that I am one or the other sex?

--------------

gay marriage should be legal because the status quo is actively supporting sexual discrimination. If I have both a penis and a vagina, I should still be able to marry exactly who I want, correct?

but the only way it wll be over turned is when a supreme court justice has an openly gay son/daughter or a mixed-sex child, imo.

Jonah
Scholar
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:32 pm

Post #10

Post by Jonah »

Yes. You're just using the older term. The classical hermaphrodite is a subset of the wider unbrella term intersexual. Although, there are various conditions that result in a hermaphrodite morphology.

It would seem to me that if fundies feel the need to bust their butts to outlaw gay marriage, even more, they have reason to outlaw intersexual marriage. Yet, they do not wish to take up the subject. I wonder why that is.

Post Reply