Theology journals

[juliod]

I don't know much about theology. But I do know that there is a field of academic, high-end, serious journals for that subject.

Why don't creationists publish there?

They certainly could. Any evidence that reveals something about god, the creator, or whatever, would certianly be welcome there. Creationism, properly considered, is a sub-field of theology.

So why don't they do it?

My personal suspicion is that the only thing creationists know less about than science is theology. Is suspect that they get an even greater whipping than they do in science when they try to infiltrate theological circles.

DanZ

[jcrawford]

Here. Living tissue found in 70 scientific million years old dinosaur.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683/

No evidence of longevity, though. So are you saying that you lied when you made the above claim?

Scientific longevity, steen, scientific longevity. Soft tissue in a 70 million year old dinosuar fossil is an extreme example of 'scientific longevity,' steen.

[Grumpy]

jcrawford

Neaderthal Noah, Neaderthal Jesus, Neaderthal Moses, Neanderthal Abraham, Neaderthal Adam, Neanderthal Eve, Neanderthal Job

I studied the Bible for over 50 years and this is the first time I've seen this revision. I think JC thinks his name is Jesus Christ because his initials are the same. That makes as much sense as his idiotic ideas, maybe more.

Hint John, the only thing those people and Neanderthals have in common is they all died, nothing else.

Grumpy 8)

[QED]

Now that we've done with this little "misunderstanding" let's have your evidence for 900 year life spans in Neanderthals.

Descendents of Neanderthal Noah (950 year life span) inherited Neanderthal morphologies for generations until their life spans gradually decreased to less than 200 during Abraham's lifetime.

So nothing outside of the bible then? Does it not bother you that the bible has shown great errors in chronology in another area (i.e. placing the flood in the middle of the Egyptian fifth dynasty). You yourself have had to concede that the testimony has been proven to be unreliable. So when we are presented with another extraordinary claim from the very same source you expect people to take it seriously. Why?

[micatala]

Just a note. THis thread seems to have gone very far off the topic of why creationists don't publish in theology journals. If you all want to continue to discuss claims of Neanderthal ancestry, I would suggest moving to another thread, or moving this thread to Random Ramblings.

[jcrawford]

jcrawford

Neaderthal Noah, Neaderthal Jesus, Neaderthal Moses, Neanderthal Abraham, Neaderthal Adam, Neanderthal Eve, Neanderthal Job

Hint John, the only thing those people and Neanderthals have in common is they all died, nothing else.

Besides dying, they were all genealogically related on the same ancestral family tree. That's why I claim ancestral descent from Neanderthal Noah. It includes me in the superfamily and human family of Christ's family tree.

[jcrawford]

Descendents of Neanderthal Noah (950 year life span) inherited Neanderthal morphologies for generations until their life spans gradually decreased to less than 200 during Abraham's lifetime.

So nothing outside of the bible then? Does it not bother you that the bible has shown great errors in chronology in another area (i.e. placing the flood in the middle of the Egyptian fifth dynasty).

The error is committed by those who would place the Egyptian fifth dynasty before or during the the Flood.

You yourself have had to concede that the testimony has been proven to be unreliable.

More likely the archaeological testimony is unreliable.

So when we are presented with another extraordinary claim from the very same source you expect people to take it seriously. Why?

I don't expect anything other than to present my views.

[steen]

Here. Living tissue found in 70 scientific million years old dinosaur.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683/

No evidence of longevity, though. So are you saying that you lied when you made the above claim?

Scientific longevity, steen, scientific longevity. Soft tissue in a 70 million year old dinosuar fossil is an extreme example of 'scientific longevity,' steen.

Nah, it is example of chemical or physiological structure longevity.

[Cephus]

The error is committed by those who would place the Egyptian fifth dynasty before or during the the Flood.

There never was a Flood, it's all a complete myth, just like most of the rest of what's in the Bible.

I don't expect anything other than to present my views.

Then you'd best make sure that your views are worthwhile and accurately represent reality. Otherwise, what you're doing is no better than what Charles Berlitz did with the Bermuda Triangle.

[jcrawford]

Scientific longevity, steen, scientific longevity. Soft tissue in a 70 million year old dinosuar fossil is an extreme example of 'scientific longevity,' steen.

Nah, it is example of chemical or physiological structure longevity.

Chemical or physiological structures of extreme longevity are examples of scientific longevity, no? You wouldn't call them legendary, mythological, fictional or religious examples of longevity, would you?

[jcrawford]

The error is committed by those who would place the Egyptian fifth dynasty before or during the the Flood.

There never was a Flood, it's all a complete myth, just like most of the rest of what's in the Bible.

Do you think it wise or advantageous to expose inherent neo-Darwinist racism against people of Noahic and Semitic descent on the WWW?