Zzyzx wrote:Creationists and other proponents of the literal flood base their arguments upon scripture (Bronze Age storytellers’ tales) rather than upon actual study of the fields of biology, meteorology, climatology, archeology, etc.
Are there scientists in various scientific fields on the side of the literal flood, as described by the Bible? Please cite examples of published scientists who are recognized experts in their fields who have published works in their areas of expertise supporting the creationist flood.Easyrider wrote:Nuts. There are scientists in various scientific fields on both sides of the issue who investigate physical data.
What not to do: cite, for example, a meteorologist who has published a critique of evolution.
Using Zzyzx's list, show us someone who is doing new recognized research work in biology who is a published supporter of all life being evolved from a single boat load of specimens within the last 5,000 years. Show us a leading meteorologist who advocates that there were no rainbows before the alleged flood. Find an archaeologist who is taken seriously when he asserts that all existing human civilizations are descended from a single family that emerged near Mt. Ararat about 5,000 years ago. Find a hydrologist who believes that there is enough water on earth to have flooded the world. Find a geologist who echoes the claims made by creationists that the mountains were significantly lower during the time that humans inhabited earth.
Where are the creationist scientists?
