AlAyeti wrote:You are simply allowing and celebrating sin to be OK. There is no other position you have on this. You have no justification Biblically, to hold your position of permissiveness of sexual sin.
Liberal or otherwise, you are being permissive and allowing them to go and sin more within your theology.
My theology has little to do with it. But if you must drag it into this discussion, sin is a matter between a person and God - I follow the teachings of Jesus, judging not lest I be judged. If following Jesus in this regard is being permissive, then
so be it. I'm not a priest; I can't absolve people from their sin, nor can I condemn them because of it. I will not usurp the authority of God.
That's my Biblical justification. I don't reach for the mote in another's eye when I may have a beam in my own.
AlAyeti wrote:Democrats champion the sexual rights of homosexuals as if they were a "people." "They" are not. That is why I hammer the democrats.
Look at their argumentation again. The Democratic line wants to treat homosexuals the same way as heterosexuals are treated in terms of legal rights. Cultural identity (a very fuzzy distinction IMHO) has nothing to do with it.
You're at the straw men with a torch again.
AlAyeti wrote:Magus, CANNOT find Biblical support for justifying permissiveness on the matter being discussed.
You should have waited for a response before claiming rhetorical victory on this one. I can find support in the Bible for being humble, whereas I may point out that your attitude on the matter is downright pharisaic.
AlAyeti wrote:Now decency, that is being attacked and redefined by Democrats.
That's really funny, because I find that it's the Republicans who seem to have the hardest time being decent.
AlAyeti wrote:I'm not afraid of the truth
Then why do you keep ignoring it even when it jumps in your face?
AlAyeti wrote:They have to force their view on every facet of life. Education, public and private. Now, the UC Educators are denying Christian students credits for being taught to be skeptical of evolution and learning "Creationism," in Christian High Schools. Most of those schools if not all, turn out a large number of collge students accepted for the last hundred years in every major University. But now they are being attacked for teaching what they believe in.
Teaching what you believe in
as fact is reprehensible. Creationism and ID aren't science, they are philosophy and deserve to be taught as such. I've no objection to creationist philosophy being taught in a university, but those who think on it as a science are simply fooling themselves. The concept of a universe created by God I share, but I also realise it is not amenable to testing by the scientific method. Evolution is.