http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/ ... rison.html
http://www.drudge.com/news/127323/oklah ... ian-prison
So apparently Christians saved up enough money to build their very own prison. This prison will hire only Christians, which is certainly against the law. Another important piece of information is that it is not a maximum security prison, and it will only be for prisoners at the end of their sentence.
The prison is obviously set up to be primed for proselytizers, who will share the Bible with the criminals.
Is this a good idea, or is it discriminatory, disastrous, and ironic?
Christian Prison
Moderator: Moderators
- Sir Rhetor
- Apprentice
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:57 pm
- Location: The Fourth Spacial Dimension
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned

- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
Post #11
How great is that?
All the successes you can count for a god you can't show exists.
All the failures you get to blame on some bogeyman you can't show exists.
I'd be curious to know if public funds are used.
All the successes you can count for a god you can't show exists.
All the failures you get to blame on some bogeyman you can't show exists.
I'd be curious to know if public funds are used.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #12
I'd say large numbers of dramatically changed lives is evidence for His existance.joeyknuccione wrote:How great is that?
All the successes you can count for a god you can't show exists.
All the failures you get to blame on some bogeyman you can't show exists.
I'd be curious to know if public funds are used.
Why don't you start your own religion and try to get the same results?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned

- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #14
Not to someone who's mind is already made up to reject God. Read the survey with the aforementioned results I posted earlier.joeyknuccione wrote: You'd say it. You'd never be able to prove it.
Neither am I.I'm not a con man.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Post #15
I still would like my question from up the thread answered. Would you support a similar institution built upon Islamic teachings and institutions, that let people go early for accepting the words of the Prophet Muhammad as the word of God or is that a special privilege reserved for those who accept Christ and Christ alone?
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #16
Where does it say they let prisoners go early? The OP says it is for prisoners at the end of their sentences.Abraxas wrote:I still would like my question from up the thread answered. Would you support a similar institution built upon Islamic teachings and institutions, that let people go early
I wouldn't care of Muslims did this, as long as it wasn't controlled by radicals. An alarming number of Muslim prison chaplins are radical. Here is a discussion of this problem: http://www.radicalislam.org/content/rob ... nt-prisons Note the NY prison Iman fired after declaring in one of his 'sermons' that the 9/11 criminals should be considered Islamic martyrs. I guess it's a short step from street thug to jihadist.for accepting the words of the Prophet Muhammad as the word of God or is that a special privilege reserved for those who accept Christ and Christ alone?
There is a difference between a Christian program with good results (much less recarceration) and a Wahabbi Muslim program that radicalizes inmates for an even more criminal future.
IMHO it is a bit different when talking about radical Islam as it is as much a fascist, expansionary political ideology as it is a religion.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Post #17
No, it isn't. Can it be shown that it's God that made them change, and not just their belief in God?East of Eden wrote:I'd say large numbers of dramatically changed lives is evidence for His existance.
Can it be shown that this is an actual causation and not just merely a correlation?
This prison isn't just talking about hiring a chaplain or two. They're saying that they're only going to hire christians... period. What right does a publicly funded prison have to only hire workers of a certain religion? Do you honestly and seriously disagree that this is wrong? Since the religion happens to be yours, that makes it ok?East of Eden wrote:The Federal Gov't. does currently pay for chaplains.
"Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all." - Thomas Paine
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #18
Are there other religions getting similar 'results' due to their belief in their God?JBlack wrote: No, it isn't. Can it be shown that it's God that made them change, and not just their belief in God?![]()
So have a bunch of Bhuddists start their own prison program.This prison isn't just talking about hiring a chaplain or two. They're saying that they're only going to hire christians... period. What right does a publicly funded prison have to only hire workers of a certain religion?
Yes.Do you honestly and seriously disagree that this is wrong?
You seem to oppose this because the religion isn't yours.Since the religion happens to be yours, that makes it ok?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Post #19
I don't know of any official studies to refer you to, but I do know a few guys that became Muslim in prison and haven't returned since. Doesn't matter though. It can't be shown that God made any of these people change.East of Eden wrote:Are there other religions getting similar 'results' due to their belief in their God?JBlack wrote:No, it isn't. Can it be shown that it's God that made them change, and not just their belief in God?
So you have no problem with Buddhists using taxpayer money to fund a prison that's only going to hire Buddhists?...East of Eden wrote:So have a bunch of Bhuddists start their own prison program.JBlack wrote:This prison isn't just talking about hiring a chaplain or two. They're saying that they're only going to hire christians... period. What right does a publicly funded prison have to only hire workers of a certain religion?
I have no religion. However, if a prison, that's being funded with public money, said that they were only going to hire people who are non-religious, I'd be equally opposed.East of Eden wrote:You seem to oppose this because the religion isn't yours.JBlack wrote:Since the religion happens to be yours, that makes it ok?
"Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all." - Thomas Paine
Post #20
It doesn't (yet) for this one specifically, however other prisons do have release programs for 'good Christians' and something tells me this one probably won't be different.East of Eden wrote:Where does it say they let prisoners go early? The OP says it is for prisoners at the end of their sentences.Abraxas wrote:I still would like my question from up the thread answered. Would you support a similar institution built upon Islamic teachings and institutions, that let people go early
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/natio ... UR.html?hp
I could say the same of a lot of Christians in the US who are pushing for Christian law in place of what currently exists. Further, as already pointed out, the results are ambiguous at best. Correlation is not causation and should not be treated as such.I wouldn't care of Muslims did this, as long as it wasn't controlled by radicals. An alarming number of Muslim prison chaplins are radical. Here is a discussion of this problem: http://www.radicalislam.org/content/rob ... nt-prisons Note the NY prison Iman fired after declaring in one of his 'sermons' that the 9/11 criminals should be considered Islamic martyrs. I guess it's a short step from street thug to jihadist.for accepting the words of the Prophet Muhammad as the word of God or is that a special privilege reserved for those who accept Christ and Christ alone?
There is a difference between a Christian program with good results (much less recarceration) and a Wahabbi Muslim program that radicalizes inmates for an even more criminal future.
IMHO it is a bit different when talking about radical Islam as it is as much a fascist, expansionary political ideology as it is a religion.
Directed at JBlack, I know, but I oppose this not because the religion isn't mine but because giving anyone special privileges, including such things as getting out of jail sooner, because of their belief set is a direct violation of the ideals of religious freedom and equality under the law.

