Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:It is true that Quakers are not biblical literalists, nor do they even consider themselves Christian anymore, but I believe you mentioned a congregationalist or two and congregationalists were probably one of the most fundamentalist Christian sects of the time.
I think you're halfway right here. The use of 'fundamentalist' is somewhat anachronistic in this case (since fundamentalism didn't emerge until the evolution-creationism debates of the 1920's). The Congregationalists started out as an extremely strict and incredibly intolerant Christian sect (during the 17th and 18th centuries), with a very dim view of women's rights. However, the East Coast Congregationalists started seriously questioning their own strictness and intolerance starting quite early in the 19th century, with the Unitarian / Calvinist split following the appointment of Henry Ware to the Hollis Chair at Harvard University.
Despite some Congregationalist support of abolitionism and other leftist causes during the American Antebellum, I don't think the Congregationalists could really be considered 'liberal' in any meaningful sense of the word until
Horace Bushnell's
Christian Nurture (a treatise essentially advocating basic rights of children in Christian families) was published in the 1840's. That said, by the time women's rights became a serious political issue, Congregationalists were some of the leading liberal voices in the society.